Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.


Journal

Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU
ISSN: 1097-0096
Titre abrégé: J Clin Ultrasound
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401663

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
revised: 11 11 2021
received: 23 10 2021
accepted: 03 12 2021
pubmed: 8 1 2022
medline: 16 2 2022
entrez: 7 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography (US) with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis in context of laboratory blood test values. This retrospective study included patients who underwent both MRCP and US as part of their choledocholithiasis workup. MRCP findings, reviewed by two board-certified radiologists, laboratory findings, and US reports were collected. Our study included 243 patients. On US examination 74 cases were found dilated (30.5%), while 94 cases showed dilation (38.7%) by MRCP. The overall accuracy of US was 76.1%, where 185 patients had similar MRCP and US findings, 7.8% had false positive ultrasound, and 16% had false negative ultrasound finding. The accuracy of ultrasound was significantly higher in males (p = .013). In addition, a significant difference in duct dilatation as found by ultrasound and accuracy of diagnosis (p = .01). Although US has a relatively low accuracy, its properties of being cost-effective and non-invasive make it an ideal first step in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. If a patient has elevated liver enzymes or a high risk of choledocholithiasis, we recommend that MRCP be performed even no dilation was seen on US.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34995366
doi: 10.1002/jcu.23136
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

247-253

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

McNicoll CF, Pastorino A, Farooq U, Hill CRS. Choledocholithiasis. Controv Laparosc Surg. 2021;15:261-267.
Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2019;51(5):472-491.
Williams E, Beckingham I, El SG, et al. Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut. 2017;66(5):765-782.
Qiu Y, Yang Z, Li Z, Zhang W, Xue D. Is preoperative MRCP necessary for patients with gallstones? An analysis of the factors related to missed diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by preoperative ultrasound. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15(1):158.
Gurusamy KS, Giljaca V, Takwoingi Y, et al. Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(2):1-48.
Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol. 2000;55(1):25-35.
Guarise A, Baltieri S, Mainardi P, Faccioli N. Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP in choledocholithiasis. Radiol Med. 2005;109(3):239-251.
Rachmi Fauziah Rahayu LMYY, Maharina L, Yueniwati Y, Rahayu RF, Maharina L, Yueniwati Y. Ultrasonography (USG) diagnostic test compared to magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatografy (MRCP) in patients with obstructive jaundice in Dr. Moewardi Public Hospital. GSC Adv Res Rev. 2020;5(2):167-171.
Chen T, Hung C-R, Huang A-C, Lii J-M, Chen R-C. The diameter of the common bile duct in an asymptomatic Taiwanese population: measurement by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Chin Med Assoc. 2012;75(8):384-388.
Lal N, Mehra S, Lal V. Ultrasonographic measurement of normal common bile duct diameter and its correlation with age, sex and anthropometry. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(12):AC01-AC04.
Copelan A, Kapoor BS. Choledocholithiasis: diagnosis and management. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;18(4):244-255.
Roston AD, Jacobson IM. Evaluation of the pattern of liver tests and yield of cholangiography in symptomatic choledocholithiasis: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;45(5):394-399.
Yang M-H, Chen T-H, Wang S-E, et al. Biochemical predictors for absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2007;22(7):1620-1624.
Alkarboly TAM, Fatih SM, Hussein HA, Ali TM, Faraj HI. The accuracy of transabdominal ultrasound in detection of the common bile duct stone as compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (with literature review). Open J Gastroenterol. 2016;6(10):275-299.
Shea JA, Berlin JA, Escarce JJ, et al. Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(22):2573-2581.
Stokes E, Hallgren S, Durán L. Gallstones: a comparison of real-time ultrasonography and cholecystography with surgical correlation. South Med J. 1987;80(8):965-968.
Argiriov Y, Dani M, Tsironis C, Koizia LJ. Cholecystectomy for complicated gallbladder and common biliary duct stones: current surgical management. Front Surg. 2020;7:42.
De SSL, Pathirana AA, Wijerathne TK, Gamage BD, Dassanayake BK, De SMM. Transabdominal ultrasonography in symptomatic choledocholithiasis-usefulness in settings with limited resources. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2019;9(31):1-6.
Isherwood J, Garcea G, Williams R, Metcalfe M, Dennison AR. Serology and ultrasound for diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96(3):224-228.
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, et al. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(6):1075-1105.e15.
Chen W, Mo J-J, Lin L, Li C-Q, Zhang J-F. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(11):3351-3360.
Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen GM, Adler DG. EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64(2):248-254.
Meeralam Y, Al-Shammari K, Yaghoobi M. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS compared with MRCP in detecting choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in head-to-head studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86(6):986-993.
Kaltenthaler E, Vergel YB, Chilcott J, et al. A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(10):1-5.
Rahman R, Ju J, Shamma J, Goebel S, Sundaram U. Correlation between MRCP and ERCP findings at a tertiary care hospital. W V Med J. 2010;106(5):14-19.

Auteurs

Osama Samara (O)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Muayad I Azzam (MI)

School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Mohammad A Alshrouf (MA)

School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Asim N Khanfar (AN)

School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Rand Rafid Mohialdeen (RR)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Ola Fawwaz Barham (OF)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Mohammad Fawwaz Barham (MF)

School of medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.

Saif Aldeen AlRyalat (SA)

Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH