Fish bone migration after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Incidence and treatment options.
bile ducts
computed tomography
double-balloon endoscopy
foreign bodies
pancreaticoduodenectomy
Journal
Journal of digestive diseases
ISSN: 1751-2980
Titre abrégé: J Dig Dis
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101302699
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
revised:
20
12
2021
received:
02
07
2021
accepted:
28
12
2021
pubmed:
30
12
2021
medline:
1
2
2022
entrez:
29
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Migration of a fish bone to the bile duct or pancreatic duct is a possible complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this study was to clarify the incidence and indications for intervention in such cases. We reviewed the cases with fish bone migration after PD detected on computed tomography (CT) scan between October 2000 and October 2020 were reviewed and the incidence of fish bone migration, presence of symptoms and signs, therapeutic modalities and patient outcomes were analyzed. Among the 1475 PD procedures performed at our institution during the study period, 14 cases of fish bone migration were noted on CT, the incidence of which was 0.95% (14/1475). The time duration from surgery to the detection of fish bone ranged from 88 to 5902 days (median 917 d). Ten patients remained asymptomatic without therapeutic intervention for up to 2919 days (median 509 d). Four patients were treated by endoscopy, either at the patient's request (n = 1) or because of their symptoms (n = 3), and removal was successful in three cases but failed in one case in which the fish bone migrated to the right intrahepatic bile duct. No surgical treatment was required in any case. The incidence of fish bone migration on CT after PD was about 1%. Some cases resolved spontaneously, and most of the asymptomatic cases required no intervention. For symptomatic cases, endoscopic treatment should be considered first. It is important to confirm the location of the fish bone by CT and determine whether it can be removed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34965014
doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13077
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
44-49Informations de copyright
© 2021 Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Kumar D, Venugopalan Nair A, Nepal P, Alotaibi TZ, Al-Heidous M, Blair Macdonald D. Abdominal CT manifestations in fish bone foreign body injuries: what the radiologist needs to know. Acta Radiol Open. 2021;10(7):20584601211026808. https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601211026808.
Goh BKP, Tan YM, Lin SE, et al. CT in the preoperative diagnosis of fish bone perforation of the gastrointestinal tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(3):710-714.
Kim YH, Kim YJ, Park WK, Lee SK, Kwon JH, Woo SK. Fish bone as a nidus for stone formation in the common bile duct: report of two cases. Korean J Radiol. 2004;5(3):210-213.
Kaji H, Asano N, Tamura H, Yuh I. Common bile duct stone caused by a fish bone: report of a case. Surg Today. 2004;34(3):268-271.
Kuga T, Oka K, Iguchi T, et al. A case report of the patient with foreign body (fish bone) in the intrahepatic bile duct after pylorus preserved pancreatoduodenectomy. Geka (JPN). 2016;78(10):1123-1127. [in Japanese].
Sakakida T, Sato H, Doi T, et al. A bile duct stone formation around a fish bone as a nidus after pancreatoduodenectomy. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2018;12(1):69-75.
Bamba H, Nakata T, Sato Y, et al. A case report of a bile duct stone whose formation was induced by a fish bone after pancreatoduodenectomy. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2017;59(1):62-67. [in Japanese with English abstract].
Ishiguro R, Otani Y, Taniguchi K, et al. A case of repeated liver abscess due to fish bone invading the right intrahepatic bile duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Geka (JPN). 2020;82(11):1191-1194. [in Japanese].
Koga Y, Soyama A, Kitasato A, Takatsuki M, Eguchi S. Fishbone migration in the intrahepatic bile duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy. ACG Case Rep J. 2018;5:e18. https://doi.org/10.14309/crj.2018.18.
Wu XL, Li SW. Biliary stricture caused by a fish bone masquerading as anastomotic recurrence from distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am Surg. 2020;86(1):e1-e3.
Akahane M, Kusakabe M, Murakami M, et al. Fishbone migration to bile ducts after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case series. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44(4):1217-1222.
Ishikawa T, Kawashima H, Ohno E, et al. Endoscopic removal of a fish bone piercing the bile duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Endoscopy. 2021;53:E164-E165.
Shishido T, Suzuki J, Ikeda R, Kobayashi Y, Katori Y. Characteristics of fish-bone foreign bodies in the upper aero-digestive tract: the importance of identifying the species of fish. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0255947. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255947.
Nishio R, Kawashima H, Nakamura M, et al. Double-balloon endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for patients who underwent liver operation: a retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(10):1056-1066.
Shimatani M, Hatanaka H, Kogure H, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography using a short-type double-balloon endoscope in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(12):1750-1758.
Kang CM, Lee JH. Pathophysiology after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(19):5794-5804.