Chronic urticaria patients are interested in apps to monitor their disease activity and control: A UCARE CURICT analysis.
UCARE
apps
chronic inducible urticaria
chronic spontaneous urticaria
chronic urticaria
chronische induzierbare urtikaria
chronische spontane urtikaria
chronische urtikaria
Journal
Clinical and translational allergy
ISSN: 2045-7022
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Allergy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101576043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
revised:
03
12
2021
received:
08
10
2021
accepted:
07
12
2021
entrez:
28
12
2021
pubmed:
29
12
2021
medline:
29
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Information/communication technologies such as mobile phone applications (apps) would enable chronic urticaria (CU) patients to self-evaluate their disease activity and control. Yet, recently Antó et al (2021) reported a global paucity of such apps for patients with CU. In this analysis, we assessed patient interest in using apps to monitor CU disease activity and control using questions from the chronic urticaria information and communication technologies (CURICT) study. The methodology for CURICT has been reported. Briefly, a 23-item questionnaire was completed by 1841 CU patients from 17 UCAREs across 17 countries. Here, we analyzed patient responses to the CURICT questions on the use of apps for urticaria-related purposes. As previously published, the majority of respondents had chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU; 63%; 18% chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) [CIndu]; 19% with both), were female (70%) and in urban areas (75%). Over half of patients were very/extremely interested in an app to monitor disease activity (51%) and control (53%), while only ∼1/10 were not. Patients with both urticaria types versus those with CSU only (odds ratio [OR], 1.36 [1.03-1.79]) and females versus males (OR [95% CI], 1.47 [1.17-1.85]) were more likely to be very to extremely interested in an app to assess disease control. Overall, half of the patients with CU were very to extremely interested in using an app to assess their disease activity and control. Development of well-designed apps, specific to disease types (CSU, CIndU, CSU + CIndU, etc), validated by experts across platforms would help improve the management and possibly outcomes of CU treatment while providing important patient information to be used in future research.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Information/communication technologies such as mobile phone applications (apps) would enable chronic urticaria (CU) patients to self-evaluate their disease activity and control. Yet, recently Antó et al (2021) reported a global paucity of such apps for patients with CU. In this analysis, we assessed patient interest in using apps to monitor CU disease activity and control using questions from the chronic urticaria information and communication technologies (CURICT) study.
METHODS
METHODS
The methodology for CURICT has been reported. Briefly, a 23-item questionnaire was completed by 1841 CU patients from 17 UCAREs across 17 countries. Here, we analyzed patient responses to the CURICT questions on the use of apps for urticaria-related purposes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
As previously published, the majority of respondents had chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU; 63%; 18% chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) [CIndu]; 19% with both), were female (70%) and in urban areas (75%). Over half of patients were very/extremely interested in an app to monitor disease activity (51%) and control (53%), while only ∼1/10 were not. Patients with both urticaria types versus those with CSU only (odds ratio [OR], 1.36 [1.03-1.79]) and females versus males (OR [95% CI], 1.47 [1.17-1.85]) were more likely to be very to extremely interested in an app to assess disease control.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, half of the patients with CU were very to extremely interested in using an app to assess their disease activity and control. Development of well-designed apps, specific to disease types (CSU, CIndU, CSU + CIndU, etc), validated by experts across platforms would help improve the management and possibly outcomes of CU treatment while providing important patient information to be used in future research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34962721
doi: 10.1002/clt2.12089
pmc: PMC8684305
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e12089Subventions
Organisme : This study was funded by the network of urticaria centers of reference and excellence (UCARE,www.ga2len-ucare.com)
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.
Références
Allergy. 2017 Jun;72(6):857-865
pubmed: 28072463
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 17;8(4):e15514
pubmed: 32301735
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Oct 30;13(11):100475
pubmed: 33204387
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Nov;125(5):581-588
pubmed: 32711031
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Sep 1;5(9):e28784
pubmed: 34468325
Allergy. 2021 Dec;76(12):3810-3813
pubmed: 34437706
World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Jun 04;14(6):100542
pubmed: 34141048