Lifetime Cost-effectiveness of Oral Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide and Liraglutide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Oral Antidiabetics.


Journal

Clinical therapeutics
ISSN: 1879-114X
Titre abrégé: Clin Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7706726

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
received: 11 03 2021
revised: 15 07 2021
accepted: 30 08 2021
pubmed: 4 11 2021
medline: 29 1 2022
entrez: 3 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To estimate the incremental cost-utility ratio of oral semaglutide (14 mg once daily) vs other glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist treatments among adults with type 2 diabetes that was inadequately controlled with 1 to 2 oral antidiabetic drugs from a US payer perspective. A state-transition model with a competing risk approach was developed for diabetic complications and risk of cardiovascular events based on the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 1 equations. Baseline population characteristics reflect the PIONEER 4 trial (Efficacy and Safety of Oral Semaglutide Versus Liraglutide and Versus Placebo in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) of oral semaglutide. Model comparators included subcutaneous semaglutide, dulaglutide, and liraglutide. Treatment effects (change in glycosylated hemoglobin, weight, and systolic blood pressure) were estimated by network meta-analysis. Drug, management, and event costs (in 2019 US dollars), survival after nonfatal events, and utilities were obtained from the literature. Costs and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) outcomes were discounted at 3% annually over a lifetime horizon. Probabilistic and 1-way sensitivity analyses were performed. Total estimated costs and QALYs were $144,065 and 12.98 for oral semaglutide, $145,721 and 12.96 for dulaglutide, $145,833 and 12.99 for SC semaglutide, and $149,428 and 12.97 for liraglutide, respectively. Oral semaglutide was less costly and more effective than dulaglutide and liraglutide but less costly than subcutaneous semaglutide with similar effectiveness. Oral semaglutide was favored versus subcutaneous semaglutide in 52.10% of model replications at a willingness-to-pay of $150,000 per QALY. Oral semaglutide is predicted to offer health benefits similar to subcutaneous semaglutide and ahead of dulaglutide and liraglutide. Oral semaglutide is a cost-effective glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist treatment option.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34728099
pii: S0149-2918(21)00314-3
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.08.015
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Glycated Hemoglobin A 0
Hypoglycemic Agents 0
Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments 0
Recombinant Fusion Proteins 0
semaglutide 53AXN4NNHX
Glucagon-Like Peptides 62340-29-8
Liraglutide 839I73S42A
dulaglutide WTT295HSY5

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1812-1826.e7

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Nancy A Risebrough (NA)

ICON plc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: Nancy.Risebrough@iconplc.com.

Timothy M Baker (TM)

ICON plc, New York, New York.

Lirong Zhang (L)

ICON plc, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.

Sarah N Ali (SN)

Novo Nordisk Inc, Plainsboro Township, New Jersey.

Michael Radin (M)

Novo Nordisk Inc, Plainsboro Township, New Jersey.

Tam Dang-Tan (T)

Novo Nordisk Inc, Plainsboro Township, New Jersey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH