IDH-wild-type glioblastoma cell density and infiltration distribution influence on supramarginal resection and its impact on overall survival: a mathematical model.
IDH–wild type
glioblastoma
mathematical model
oncology
supramarginal resection
supratotal resection
Journal
Journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1933-0693
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0253357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jun 2022
01 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
08
04
2021
accepted:
18
06
2021
medline:
30
10
2021
pubmed:
30
10
2021
entrez:
29
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recent studies have proposed resection of the T2 FLAIR hyperintensity beyond the T1 contrast enhancement (supramarginal resection [SMR]) for IDH-wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) to further improve patients' overall survival (OS). GBMs have significant variability in tumor cell density, distribution, and infiltration. Advanced mathematical models based on patient-specific radiographic features have provided new insights into GBM growth kinetics on two important parameters of tumor aggressiveness: proliferation rate (ρ) and diffusion rate (D). The aim of this study was to investigate OS of patients with IDH-wild-type GBM who underwent SMR based on a mathematical model of cell distribution and infiltration profile (tumor invasiveness profile). Volumetric measurements were obtained from the selected regions of interest from pre- and postoperative MRI studies of included patients. The tumor invasiveness profile (proliferation/diffusion [ρ/D] ratio) was calculated using the following formula: ρ/D ratio = (4π/3)2/3 × (6.106/[VT21/1 - VT11/1])2, where VT2 and VT1 are the preoperative FLAIR and contrast-enhancing volumes, respectively. Patients were split into subgroups based on their tumor invasiveness profiles. In this analysis, tumors were classified as nodular, moderately diffuse, or highly diffuse. A total of 101 patients were included. Tumors were classified as nodular (n = 34), moderately diffuse (n = 34), and highly diffuse (n = 33). On multivariate analysis, increasing SMR had a significant positive correlation with OS for moderately and highly diffuse tumors (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p = 0.02; and HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99; p = 0.04, respectively). On threshold analysis, OS benefit was seen with SMR from 10% to 29%, 10% to 59%, and 30% to 90%, for nodular, moderately diffuse, and highly diffuse, respectively. The impact of SMR on OS for patients with IDH-wild-type GBM is influenced by the degree of tumor invasiveness. The authors' results show that increasing SMR is associated with increased OS in patients with moderate and highly diffuse IDH-wild-type GBMs. When grouping SMR into 10% intervals, this benefit was seen for all tumor subgroups, although for nodular tumors, the maximum beneficial SMR percentage was considerably lower than in moderate and highly diffuse tumors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34715662
doi: 10.3171/2021.6.JNS21925
pii: 2021.6.JNS21925
pmc: PMC9248269
mid: NIHMS1816814
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1567-1575Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA216855
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA195503
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA217836
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA183827
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R33 CA240181
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA015083
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R43 CA221490
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA200399
Pays : United States