Child safety in cars: An observational study on the use of child restraint systems in The Netherlands.


Journal

Traffic injury prevention
ISSN: 1538-957X
Titre abrégé: Traffic Inj Prev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101144385

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
pubmed: 30 10 2021
medline: 1 2 2022
entrez: 29 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To minimize children's injuries due to car accidents, children must be transported in approved child restraint systems (CRS). The European Union optimized child protection by implementing R129 legislation for CRS in 2013. However, compliance with CRS recommendations after introduction of this newer standard has been scarcely evaluated. The main objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of various types of CRS misuse and to investigate the use of ISOFIX and i-Size seats and parental knowledge regarding safe transportation of children in cars 5 years after the introduction of the newer R129 standard. During a cross-sectional observational study in the summer of 2018, parking lots of sites in the Netherlands were visited by researchers. Arriving or departing Dutch drivers who transported children under 9 years old were interviewed by means of a questionnaire and the misuse of CRS was directly observed using a checklist. Misuse was defined as CRS inappropriate for the child (based on height and weight) and/or CRS wrongly installed in the car and/or child improperly restrained in CRS. In total, 392 drivers and 470 children were included in the study. Results showed that 83% of the children were transported with at least 1 misuse of their CRS: 7% of the CRS were inappropriate for the child, 49% of the CRS were wrongly installed in the car, and 59% of the children were improperly restrained in a CRS. Most CRS were installed using the seat belt (88%) compared to ISOFIX (12%). ISOFIX usage did not result in less CRS installation misuse ( For 9 out of 10 children, CRS misuse was observed. Many children were transported in an appropriate CRS, but various mistakes were made when installing the CRS in the car and restraining children in the CRS. Moreover, ISOFIX usage did not result in statistically significant less CRS installation misuse compared to traditional seat belt usage, and i-Size CRS are still rather unknown 5 years after their introduction.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34714192
doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1980562
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

634-639

Auteurs

Maaike Cornelissen (M)

Dutch Consumer Safety Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Mariëlle Hermans (M)

Dutch Consumer Safety Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Laura Tuijl (L)

Department of Public Health, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Marjolein Versteeg (M)

Dutch Consumer Safety Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Ed van Beeck (E)

Department of Public Health, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Ellen Kemler (E)

Dutch Consumer Safety Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH