Liquefied dimethyl ether based multi-stage extraction for high efficient oil recovery from spent bleaching clay.

Adsorption equilibrium Liquefied dimethyl ether Multi-stage batch extraction Oil recovery Spent bleaching clay

Journal

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1879-2456
Titre abrégé: Waste Manag
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9884362

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 26 03 2021
revised: 26 08 2021
accepted: 24 09 2021
pubmed: 27 10 2021
medline: 18 11 2021
entrez: 26 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

With the increasing production of spent bleaching clay (SBC), the recovery of the waste oil in SBC is becoming an important and urgent needs for our environment and economy. In this research, we have developed a new effective recovery technique to recover oil from SBC by use of liquefied dimethyl ether (DME). Over 65 wt% oil and 81% wt.% oil are efficiently recovered from SBC under equilibrium single-stage extraction conditions and multi-stage extraction conditions, respectively based on the systematically investigation to the effects of the DME/SBC ratio, extraction time, stirring speed and extraction stage number on oil recovery via a batch extractor. Compared with using other extraction solvents, the extraction solvent DME can be reused without heating and therefore significantly reduce the energy consumption during the oil recovery process. In addition, the quantitative oil extraction relationship is derived from the adsorption equilibrium model and is well verified by experimental results. The results show a great potential for using this oil recovery technique in SBC as well as in the large amount of oily sludge and oil sands.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34700160
pii: S0956-053X(21)00522-5
doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.033
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Methyl Ethers 0
Sewage 0
dimethyl ether AM13FS69BX
Clay T1FAD4SS2M

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

204-212

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Dong Zhang (D)

Department of Environmental Science and Technology, School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Sipailou 2, Nanjing 210096, China; Department of Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Cluster C, Kyoto daigaku-Katsura, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan.

Ying Huang (Y)

Department of Environmental Science and Technology, School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Sipailou 2, Nanjing 210096, China. Electronic address: huangying@seu.edu.cn.

Kazuyuki Oshita (K)

Department of Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Cluster C, Kyoto daigaku-Katsura, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan. Electronic address: oshita.kazuyuki.6e@kyoto-u.ac.jp.

Masaki Takaoka (M)

Department of Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Cluster C, Kyoto daigaku-Katsura, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan.

Quan Wang (Q)

Department of Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Cluster C, Kyoto daigaku-Katsura, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan.

Changdong Sheng (C)

Department of Environmental Science and Technology, School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Sipailou 2, Nanjing 210096, China.

Zizeng Lin (Z)

Civil College, Nanjing Forest University, No.159, Longpan Road, Nanjing 210037, China.

Articles similaires

Charcoal Soil Microbiology Soil Biomass Carbon
1.00
Methylmercury Compounds Sewage Rivers Water Pollutants, Chemical Metagenomics
Anaerobiosis Methane Sewage Microbiota RNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Classifications MeSH