Effects of GP characteristics on unplanned hospital admissions and patient safety. A 9-year follow-up of all Norwegian out-of-hours contacts.
after-hours care
general practitioners
health services research
patient admission
patient safety
referral and consultation
Journal
Family practice
ISSN: 1460-2229
Titre abrégé: Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8500875
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 05 2022
28 05 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
26
10
2021
medline:
3
6
2022
entrez:
25
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There are substantial differences in hospital referrals between general practitioners (GPs); however, there is little research on the consequences for patient safety and further healthcare use. To investigate associations between out-of-hours GP characteristics, unplanned hospital admissions, and patient safety. This cohort study included all Norwegian out-of-hours services contacts from 2008 to 2016, linked to registry data on patient characteristics, healthcare use and death, and GP age, sex, specialist status, out-of-hours service experience, and prior admission proportion. We estimated the impact from GP characteristics on (i) immediate unplanned hospital admissions for "all conditions," (ii) immediate unplanned hospital admissions for "critical conditions," (iii) 30-day unplanned hospital admissions, (iv) 30-day hospital costs, and (v) 30-day risk of death. To limit confounding, we matched patients in groups by age, time, and location, with an assumption of random assignment of GPs to patients with this design. Patients under the care of older and male GPs had fewer immediate unplanned hospital admissions, but the effects on cumulative 30-day unplanned hospital admissions and costs were small. The GPs' prior admission proportion was strongly associated with both immediate and 30-day unplanned hospital admissions. Higher prior admission proportion was also associated with admitting more patients with critical conditions. There was little evidence of any associations between GP characteristics and 30-day risk of death. GPs' prior admission proportion was strongly associated with unplanned hospital admissions. We found little effects on 30-day mortality, but more restrictive referral practices may threaten patient safety through missing out on critical cases. Referral for specialized health services is a key part of the general practitioner (GP) role. Differences in referrals between primary care physicians have been widely studied, as they represent a target for reducing the use of specialized health services. However, the potential consequences beyond the actual referral have received little attention. Studying associations between physician characteristics and clinical decisions are difficult because physicians often systematically see different patient populations with different morbidity. Previous findings showing large differences in clinical decisions regarding referrals and hospital admissions may suffer from confounding. With our carefully matched study design, we could assume that the assignment of physicians to patients was random. We found substantial differences in referrals associated with GP characteristics. Seeing older and male GPs and specialists in family medicine were associated with fewer immediate unplanned hospital admissions but did not substantially influence unplanned hospital costs within 30 days. However, GPs with a history of admitting many of their recent patients had a substantial higher tendency to admit their future patients and represented a higher use of health services and costs. These GPs also referred more critically ill patients, an essential aspect of patient safety. The differences in referrals had minor impact on the patients’ 30-day risk of death.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There are substantial differences in hospital referrals between general practitioners (GPs); however, there is little research on the consequences for patient safety and further healthcare use.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate associations between out-of-hours GP characteristics, unplanned hospital admissions, and patient safety.
METHODS
This cohort study included all Norwegian out-of-hours services contacts from 2008 to 2016, linked to registry data on patient characteristics, healthcare use and death, and GP age, sex, specialist status, out-of-hours service experience, and prior admission proportion. We estimated the impact from GP characteristics on (i) immediate unplanned hospital admissions for "all conditions," (ii) immediate unplanned hospital admissions for "critical conditions," (iii) 30-day unplanned hospital admissions, (iv) 30-day hospital costs, and (v) 30-day risk of death. To limit confounding, we matched patients in groups by age, time, and location, with an assumption of random assignment of GPs to patients with this design.
RESULTS
Patients under the care of older and male GPs had fewer immediate unplanned hospital admissions, but the effects on cumulative 30-day unplanned hospital admissions and costs were small. The GPs' prior admission proportion was strongly associated with both immediate and 30-day unplanned hospital admissions. Higher prior admission proportion was also associated with admitting more patients with critical conditions. There was little evidence of any associations between GP characteristics and 30-day risk of death.
CONCLUSIONS
GPs' prior admission proportion was strongly associated with unplanned hospital admissions. We found little effects on 30-day mortality, but more restrictive referral practices may threaten patient safety through missing out on critical cases.
Referral for specialized health services is a key part of the general practitioner (GP) role. Differences in referrals between primary care physicians have been widely studied, as they represent a target for reducing the use of specialized health services. However, the potential consequences beyond the actual referral have received little attention. Studying associations between physician characteristics and clinical decisions are difficult because physicians often systematically see different patient populations with different morbidity. Previous findings showing large differences in clinical decisions regarding referrals and hospital admissions may suffer from confounding. With our carefully matched study design, we could assume that the assignment of physicians to patients was random. We found substantial differences in referrals associated with GP characteristics. Seeing older and male GPs and specialists in family medicine were associated with fewer immediate unplanned hospital admissions but did not substantially influence unplanned hospital costs within 30 days. However, GPs with a history of admitting many of their recent patients had a substantial higher tendency to admit their future patients and represented a higher use of health services and costs. These GPs also referred more critically ill patients, an essential aspect of patient safety. The differences in referrals had minor impact on the patients’ 30-day risk of death.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Referral for specialized health services is a key part of the general practitioner (GP) role. Differences in referrals between primary care physicians have been widely studied, as they represent a target for reducing the use of specialized health services. However, the potential consequences beyond the actual referral have received little attention. Studying associations between physician characteristics and clinical decisions are difficult because physicians often systematically see different patient populations with different morbidity. Previous findings showing large differences in clinical decisions regarding referrals and hospital admissions may suffer from confounding. With our carefully matched study design, we could assume that the assignment of physicians to patients was random. We found substantial differences in referrals associated with GP characteristics. Seeing older and male GPs and specialists in family medicine were associated with fewer immediate unplanned hospital admissions but did not substantially influence unplanned hospital costs within 30 days. However, GPs with a history of admitting many of their recent patients had a substantial higher tendency to admit their future patients and represented a higher use of health services and costs. These GPs also referred more critically ill patients, an essential aspect of patient safety. The differences in referrals had minor impact on the patients’ 30-day risk of death.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34694363
pii: 6409792
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab120
pmc: PMC9155163
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
381-388Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.
Références
Qual Prim Care. 2011;19(4):263-72
pubmed: 21902906
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Feb;48(1):49-55
pubmed: 31288711
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2018 May 08;138(8):
pubmed: 29737771
BMJ Open. 2014 May 23;4(5):e004746
pubmed: 24860000
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Mar;15(3):163-8
pubmed: 10718896
Med Decis Making. 2006 Jan-Feb;26(1):76-85
pubmed: 16495203
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):568
pubmed: 31412931
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Sep;57(542):706-13
pubmed: 17761058
Emerg Med J. 2011 Jul;28(7):558-63
pubmed: 21515879
BMJ. 1999 Jul 10;319(7202):98-103
pubmed: 10398636
Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb;55(1):94-102
pubmed: 31845328
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 2;9(4):e026786
pubmed: 30944138
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Feb;57(535):152-4
pubmed: 17263932
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e016439
pubmed: 28827254
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010 Jan 28;130(2):135-8
pubmed: 20125201
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Jul;64(624):e426-33
pubmed: 24982495
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 23;13:147
pubmed: 23617296
Fam Pract. 2000 Dec;17(6):462-71
pubmed: 11120716
Fam Pract. 2004 Apr;21(2):160-5
pubmed: 15020385
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Apr;67(657):e227-e237
pubmed: 28289014
Fam Pract. 2021 Sep 25;38(5):576-581
pubmed: 33755099
Fam Pract. 2020 Nov 28;37(6):744-750
pubmed: 32597962
BMJ. 2010 Nov 30;341:c6267
pubmed: 21118873
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 May 21;20(1):68
pubmed: 31113368
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Jul;55(516):529-33
pubmed: 16004738
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Jan;59(558):e16-24
pubmed: 19105912
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jan 23;172(2):163-70
pubmed: 22271124
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 May;69(682):e294-e303
pubmed: 30910875
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jan 07;13:11
pubmed: 23294563