Feasibility and clinical utility of ambulatory cough monitoring in an outpatient clinical setting: a real-world retrospective evaluation.
Journal
ERJ open research
ISSN: 2312-0541
Titre abrégé: ERJ Open Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101671641
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
07
05
2021
accepted:
09
07
2021
entrez:
7
10
2021
pubmed:
8
10
2021
medline:
8
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Objective quantification of cough is rarely utilised outside of research settings and the role of cough frequency monitoring in clinical practice has not been established. This study examined the clinical utility of cough frequency monitoring in an outpatient clinical setting. The study involved a retrospective review of cough monitor data. Participants included 174 patients referred for treatment of cough and upper airway symptoms (103 chronic cough; 50 inducible laryngeal obstruction; 21 severe asthma) and 15 controls. Measures, taken prior to treatment, included 24-h ambulatory cough frequency using the Leicester Cough Monitor, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire and Laryngeal Hypersensitivity Questionnaire. Post-treatment data were available for 50 participants. Feasibility and clinical utility were also reported. Analysis time per recording was up to 10 min. 75% of participants could use the monitors correctly, and most (93%) recordings were interpretable. The geometric mean cough frequency in patients was 10.1±2.9 (mean±sd) compared to 2.4±2.0 for healthy controls (p=0.003). There was no significant difference in cough frequency between clinical groups (p=0.080). Cough frequency decreased significantly following treatment (p<0.001). There was a moderate correlation between cough frequency and both cough quality of life and laryngeal hypersensitivity. Cough frequency monitoring was responsive to therapy and able to discriminate differences in cough frequency between diseases. While ambulatory cough frequency monitoring remains a research tool, it provides useful clinical data that can assist in patient management. Logistical issues may preclude use in some clinical settings, and additional time needs to be allocated to the process.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34616839
doi: 10.1183/23120541.00319-2021
pii: 00319-2021
pmc: PMC8488350
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Informations de copyright
Copyright ©The authors 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: A.E. Vertigan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.L. Kapela has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.S. Birring reports research funding for cough monitoring paid to King's College Hospital from Gala Therapeutics, ESA Medical and Avalyn Pharma, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P.G. Gibson has nothing to disclose.
Références
Eur Respir J. 2008 May;31(5):1013-8
pubmed: 18184683
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jun;24(3):267-71
pubmed: 21292019
Digit Biomark. 2019 Dec 10;3(3):166-175
pubmed: 32095775
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Sep;55(9):712-719
pubmed: 28679467
Asia Pac Allergy. 2014 Jan;4(1):3-13
pubmed: 24527404
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Sep;12(9):5207-5223
pubmed: 33145097
Chest. 2015 Mar;147(3):804-814
pubmed: 25522203
Eur Respir J. 2020 Mar 20;55(3):
pubmed: 31949115
Respir Res. 2019 Jun 6;20(1):81
pubmed: 31167662
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2015 Jun;22:37-40
pubmed: 25819594
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 May 1;187(9):991-7
pubmed: 23471466
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Nov;8(11):3152-3159
pubmed: 28066594
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 7;9(1):e026323
pubmed: 30617104
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018 Sep;22(5):1662-1671
pubmed: 29990219
J Thorac Dis. 2014 Oct;6(Suppl 7):S728-34
pubmed: 25383207
Cough. 2014 Feb 19;10(1):1
pubmed: 24552215
Chest. 2006 Aug;130(2):379-85
pubmed: 16899835
Eur Respir J. 2015 May;45(5):1479-81
pubmed: 25657027
Thorax. 2006 Dec;61(12):1065-9
pubmed: 16844725
Lung. 2015 Jun;193(3):401-8
pubmed: 25787221
J Asthma. 2021 Feb;58(2):160-169
pubmed: 31638844
Thorax. 2003 Apr;58(4):339-43
pubmed: 12668799