Cooperating to show that you care: costly helping as an honest signal of fitness interdependence.

altruism costly signalling food sharing stake trust welfare trade-off ratio

Journal

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2970
Titre abrégé: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7503623

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 11 2021
Historique:
entrez: 4 10 2021
pubmed: 5 10 2021
medline: 1 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Social organisms often need to know how much to trust others to cooperate. Organisms can expect cooperation from another organism that depends on them (i.e. stake or fitness interdependence), but how do individuals assess fitness interdependence? Here, we extend fitness interdependence into a signalling context: costly helping behaviour can honestly signal one's stake in others, such that those who help are trusted more. We present a mathematical model in which agents help others based on their stake in the recipient's welfare, and recipients use that information to assess whom to trust. At equilibrium, helping is a costly signal of stake: helping is worthwhile for those who value the recipient (and thus will repay any trust), but is not worthwhile for those who do not value the recipient (and thus will betray the trust). Recipients demand signals when they value the signallers less and when the cost of betrayed trust is higher; signal costs are higher when signallers have more incentive to defect. Signalling systems are more likely when the trust games resemble Prisoner's Dilemmas, Stag Hunts or Harmony Games, and are less likely in Snowdrift Games. Furthermore, we find that honest signals need not benefit recipients and can even occur between hostile parties. By signalling their interdependence, organisms benefit from increased trust, even when no future interactions will occur. This article is part of the theme issue 'The language of cooperation: reputation and honest signalling'.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34601912
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0292
pmc: PMC8487747
doi:

Banques de données

figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.17088950']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

20200292

Références

Curr Anthropol. 2008 Aug;49(4):655-93
pubmed: 19230267
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 29;357(1427):1607-16
pubmed: 12495517
J Theor Biol. 2001 Feb 21;208(4):457-74
pubmed: 11222050
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Sep 22;272(1575):1877-84
pubmed: 16191592
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 24;287(1929):20200819
pubmed: 32546089
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):1-15
pubmed: 23211191
Q Rev Biol. 2004 Jun;79(2):135-60
pubmed: 15232949
Science. 2002 Apr 5;296(5565):69-72
pubmed: 11935014
Curr Biol. 2006 Sep 5;16(17):R662-4
pubmed: 16950082
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):4820-5
pubmed: 24639494
PLoS One. 2014 May 15;9(5):e97533
pubmed: 24831097
J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):517-46
pubmed: 2402153
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2017 Nov;21(4):361-388
pubmed: 27466269
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 22;271(1551):1917-22
pubmed: 15347514
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 1;106(35):15073-8
pubmed: 19666613
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jul;2(7):429-431
pubmed: 31097813
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 26;109(26):10287-92
pubmed: 22689979
Evol Hum Behav. 2000 Jul 1;21(4):263-282
pubmed: 10899478
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 22;268(1463):187-96
pubmed: 11209890
Evol Anthropol. 2019 Mar;28(2):86-99
pubmed: 30869833
Evol Lett. 2018 May 24;2(3):201-209
pubmed: 30283676
J Theor Biol. 2020 May 7;492:110204
pubmed: 32084497
Evol Hum Behav. 2012 Nov 1;33(6):715-725
pubmed: 23162372
Am Nat. 2010 Feb;175(2):197-210
pubmed: 20014939
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 29;114(35):9290-9295
pubmed: 28811365
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 28;95(9):5100-5
pubmed: 9560235
Hum Nat. 2003 Jun;14(2):91-127
pubmed: 26190055
J Evol Biol. 2004 Nov;17(6):1195-203
pubmed: 15525404
J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17-52
pubmed: 5875340
Evol Hum Behav. 2001 Mar;22(2):113-142
pubmed: 11282309
Evol Hum Behav. 2000 Jul 1;21(4):245-261
pubmed: 10899477

Auteurs

Pat Barclay (P)

Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 2W1.

Rebecca Bliege Bird (R)

Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA.

Gilbert Roberts (G)

Independent Researcher, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary.

Szabolcs Számadó (S)

Department of Sociology and Communication, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary.
Center for Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Hungary.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH