Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish Yellow Flag Questionnaire in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Anxiety Chronic Pain Cross-Cultural Comparison Depression Factor Analysis Musculoskeletal Pain Patient Reported Outcome Measures Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Statistical Surveys and Questionnaires Validation Study.

Journal

The Korean journal of pain
ISSN: 2005-9159
Titre abrégé: Korean J Pain
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101528125

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 26 04 2021
revised: 29 06 2021
accepted: 23 07 2021
entrez: 1 10 2021
pubmed: 2 10 2021
medline: 2 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Yellow flags are psychosocial factors shown to be indicative of longterm chronicity and disability. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish Yellow Flag Questionnaire (YFQ) in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP). The cross-cultural adaptation was conducted with translation and backtranslation of the original version. Reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) was examined for 231 patients with CMP. Construct validity was assessed by correlating the YFQ with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (OMPQ), and Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TKS). Factorial validity was examined with both exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis. The YFQ showed excellent test/retest reliability with an Intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.82. The internal consistency was moderate (Cronbach's alpha of 0.797). As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, there were 7 domains compatible with the original version. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the seven-factor structure of YFQ was confirmed. There was a statistically significant correlation between YFQ-total score and OMPQ (r = 0.57, This study's results provide considerable evidence that the Turkish version of the YFQ has appropriate psychometric properties, including test-retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity and factorial validity. It can be used for evaluating psychosocial impact in patients with CMP.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Yellow flags are psychosocial factors shown to be indicative of longterm chronicity and disability. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish Yellow Flag Questionnaire (YFQ) in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP).
METHODS METHODS
The cross-cultural adaptation was conducted with translation and backtranslation of the original version. Reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) was examined for 231 patients with CMP. Construct validity was assessed by correlating the YFQ with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (OMPQ), and Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TKS). Factorial validity was examined with both exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
The YFQ showed excellent test/retest reliability with an Intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.82. The internal consistency was moderate (Cronbach's alpha of 0.797). As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, there were 7 domains compatible with the original version. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the seven-factor structure of YFQ was confirmed. There was a statistically significant correlation between YFQ-total score and OMPQ (r = 0.57,
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study's results provide considerable evidence that the Turkish version of the YFQ has appropriate psychometric properties, including test-retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity and factorial validity. It can be used for evaluating psychosocial impact in patients with CMP.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34593668
pii: kjp.2021.34.4.501
doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.4.501
pmc: PMC8494960
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

501-508

Références

Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Mar;51(3):511-21
pubmed: 24183474
PLoS One. 2015 May 12;10(5):e0127050
pubmed: 25965447
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Aug;56(8):730-5
pubmed: 12954464
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12 Suppl 2):S15-20
pubmed: 11128900
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 1;30(15):1786-92
pubmed: 16094282
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016;29(1):135-43
pubmed: 26406190
Korean J Pain. 2018 Apr;31(2):116-124
pubmed: 29686810
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S80-S89
pubmed: 28616007
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Jun;28(2):365-376
pubmed: 28887786
J Pain. 2020 May - Jun;21(5-6):557-569
pubmed: 31541719
Clin J Pain. 2003 Mar-Apr;19(2):80-6
pubmed: 12616177
Clin J Pain. 2006 Jun;22(5):458-67
pubmed: 16772801
Eur Spine J. 2020 Aug;29(8):1935-1952
pubmed: 32556625

Auteurs

Meltem Koç (M)

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Muğ la Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğ la, Turkey.

Zilan Bazancir (Z)

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Hakan Apaydın (H)

Department of Rheumatology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Burcu Talu (B)

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.

Kılıçhan Bayar (K)

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Muğ la Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğ la, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH