Validation study of novel grading system for ulnar collateral ligament injury of the elbow with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Reliability elbow grading system microscopic MRI ulnar collateral ligament ultrasound

Journal

JSES international
ISSN: 2666-6383
Titre abrégé: JSES Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763461

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
entrez: 10 9 2021
pubmed: 11 9 2021
medline: 11 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classification of medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears has been introduced, but little is known about the relationship between MRI grading and medial joint laxity. It has been reported that microscopy coils could make it possible to achieve high-resolution images of upper extremities with a superior diagnostic ability to conventional MRI. However, there is no report that has compared the diagnostic reliability between microscopic and conventional MRI. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between MRI findings and medial joint laxity evaluated with stress ultrasound (US). Secondary objective was to compare the reliabilities of UCL evaluation between microscopic and conventional MRI. One-hundred thirty baseball players who underwent MRI of the elbow for the diagnosis of UCL injury using both conventional and microscopy MRI were included in this study. They also underwent stress US for assessment of medial joint laxity against valgus stress. Our MRI grading system for UCL injuries was compared to medial joint laxity evaluated with stress US. The intrarater and interrater reliabilities of our grading system were assessed with both microscopic and conventional MRI. Our grading system was related to valgus stability, especially with microscopic MRI. The reliabilities were fair when combined with microscopic MRI, which exhibited better intrarater and interrater reliabilities than conventional MRI. High-resolution microscopic MRI may contribute to the accurate diagnosis of UCL injuries.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classification of medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears has been introduced, but little is known about the relationship between MRI grading and medial joint laxity. It has been reported that microscopy coils could make it possible to achieve high-resolution images of upper extremities with a superior diagnostic ability to conventional MRI. However, there is no report that has compared the diagnostic reliability between microscopic and conventional MRI. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between MRI findings and medial joint laxity evaluated with stress ultrasound (US). Secondary objective was to compare the reliabilities of UCL evaluation between microscopic and conventional MRI.
METHODS METHODS
One-hundred thirty baseball players who underwent MRI of the elbow for the diagnosis of UCL injury using both conventional and microscopy MRI were included in this study. They also underwent stress US for assessment of medial joint laxity against valgus stress. Our MRI grading system for UCL injuries was compared to medial joint laxity evaluated with stress US. The intrarater and interrater reliabilities of our grading system were assessed with both microscopic and conventional MRI.
RESULTS RESULTS
Our grading system was related to valgus stability, especially with microscopic MRI. The reliabilities were fair when combined with microscopic MRI, which exhibited better intrarater and interrater reliabilities than conventional MRI.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
High-resolution microscopic MRI may contribute to the accurate diagnosis of UCL injuries.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34505109
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.05.011
pii: S2666-6383(21)00160-2
pmc: PMC8411072
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

936-941

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors.

Références

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Mar;29(3):578-586
pubmed: 32067711
Sports Health. 2017 May/Jun;9(3):222-229
pubmed: 28394713
Am J Sports Med. 1994 Jan-Feb;22(1):26-31; discussion 32
pubmed: 8129106
Skeletal Radiol. 2002 Nov;31(11):671-6
pubmed: 12395281
Radiology. 2003 Apr;227(1):149-54
pubmed: 12616000
Skeletal Radiol. 2003 Oct;32(10):575-81
pubmed: 12942205
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1764-9
pubmed: 25925603
Eur Radiol. 1999;9(7):1376-80
pubmed: 10460377
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2755-2760
pubmed: 30070584
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(8):1783-1789
pubmed: 28398820
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Apr;84(4):525-31
pubmed: 11940610
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Oct;26(10):1803-1809
pubmed: 28735845
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):544-51
pubmed: 24473498
Skeletal Radiol. 2004 May;33(5):265-71
pubmed: 15045469
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Oct-Nov;32(7):1602-6
pubmed: 15494322
Clin Anat. 2019 Apr;32(3):379-389
pubmed: 30521139

Auteurs

Shota Hoshika (S)

Shoulder & Elbow Service, Funabashi Orthopaedic Sports Medicine & Joint Center, Funabashi, Chiba, Japan.

Keisuke Matsuki (K)

Shoulder & Elbow Service, Funabashi Orthopaedic Sports Medicine & Joint Center, Funabashi, Chiba, Japan.

Toshihiko Izumi (T)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Izumi Regional Medical Center, Kagoshima, Japan.

Yasutaka Takeuchi (Y)

Shoulder & Elbow Service, Funabashi Orthopaedic Sports Medicine & Joint Center, Funabashi, Chiba, Japan.

Norimasa Takahashi (N)

Shoulder & Elbow Service, Funabashi Orthopaedic Sports Medicine & Joint Center, Funabashi, Chiba, Japan.

Hiroyuki Sugaya (H)

Shoulder & Elbow Service, Funabashi Orthopaedic Sports Medicine & Joint Center, Funabashi, Chiba, Japan.

Classifications MeSH