Ultrasound Processing of Vinegar: Modelling the Impact on Bioactives and Other Quality Factors.
ACE inhibitor
antidiabetic
artificial neural network
response surface methodology
ultrasound
vinegar
Journal
Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Jul 2021
22 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
07
06
2021
revised:
17
07
2021
accepted:
19
07
2021
entrez:
27
8
2021
pubmed:
28
8
2021
medline:
28
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In recent years, non-thermal technology has been used for the enrichment of ultrasound bioactive components. For this purpose, it was applied to tomato vinegar and modeled with response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN). At the end of the RSM, cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (68.64%), 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (62.47%), total flavonoid content (2.44 mg CE/mL), total phenolic content (12.22 mg GAE/mL), total ascorbic acid content (2.53 mg/100 mL) and total lycopene (5.44 μg/mL) were determined. The ANN model has higher prediction accuracy than RSM. The microstructure, microbiological properties, sensory analysis, ACE (angiotensin-converting-enzyme) inhibitor and antidiabetic effects of the ultrasound-treated tomato vinegar (UTV) (8.9 min and 74.5 amplitude), traditional tomato vinegar (TTV) and pasteurized tomato vinegar (PTV) samples were then evaluated. UTV was generally appreciated by the panelists. It was determined that the microbiological properties were affected by the ultrasound treatment. UTV was found to have more effective ACE inhibitor and antidiabetic properties than other vinegar samples. As a result, the bioactive components of tomato vinegar were enriched with ultrasound treatment and positive effects on health were determined.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34441481
pii: foods10081703
doi: 10.3390/foods10081703
pmc: PMC8393824
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Ultrason Sonochem. 2017 Sep;38:783-793
pubmed: 28012791
Food Chem. 2017 Jan 15;215:470-6
pubmed: 27542500
Food Chem. 2016 Mar 1;194:749-57
pubmed: 26471615
Food Chem. 2018 Dec 1;268:594-601
pubmed: 30064802
J Food Sci Technol. 2020 Sep;57(9):3445-3456
pubmed: 32728291
Ultrason Sonochem. 2016 Sep;32:258-264
pubmed: 27150769
J Integr Med. 2015 Sep;13(5):297-305
pubmed: 26343100
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019 Aug;32:1-7
pubmed: 31221273
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2006 Aug-Sep;57(5-6):292-304
pubmed: 17135020
Ultrason Sonochem. 2011 Nov;18(6):1295-300
pubmed: 21550834
Ultrason Sonochem. 2018 Jul;45:1-6
pubmed: 29705302
Biochem Pharmacol. 1971 Jul;20(7):1637-48
pubmed: 4355305
Food Microbiol. 2006 Dec;23(8):809-13
pubmed: 16943087
Ultrason Sonochem. 2019 Sep;56:240-253
pubmed: 31101259
Ultrason Sonochem. 2013 Sep;20(5):1283-8
pubmed: 23545106
Ultrason Sonochem. 2011 Jul;18(4):813-35
pubmed: 21216174
Curr Med Chem. 2006;13(10):1203-18
pubmed: 16719780
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2016 Nov;15(6):1124-1138
pubmed: 33401833
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Jan;135:110976
pubmed: 31743742
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019 Oct;33:132-138
pubmed: 31451249
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2001 Dec;65(12):2690-4
pubmed: 11826965