Balanced Chromosomal Rearrangements Associated with Hypoprolificacy in Australian Boars (
FISH
chromosome
karyotype
pig
reproductive performance
subtelomere
translocation
Journal
Cells
ISSN: 2073-4409
Titre abrégé: Cells
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101600052
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 08 2021
06 08 2021
Historique:
received:
09
07
2021
revised:
30
07
2021
accepted:
03
08
2021
entrez:
27
8
2021
pubmed:
28
8
2021
medline:
16
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Balanced chromosomal rearrangements, mainly reciprocal translocations, are considered to be the causative agent of several clinical conditions in farmed pigs, resulting in hypoprolificacy and economic losses. Literature suggests that reciprocal translocations are heritable and can occur de novo. The prevalence rate of these balanced structural rearrangements of chromosomes differs from country to country and varies between 0.5% and 3.3%. The Australian pig population is descendent of a small founder population and has since been a closed genetic group since the 1980s. Hence, any incident of reciprocal translocation along with the pedigree of boars that contribute sperm for artificial insemination has the potential to have an economic consequence. To date, there has been no published account for screening of reciprocal translocation associated with hypoprolificacy in the Australian pig population. In this study, we performed standard and molecular cytogenetic analyses to identify evidence of chromosome rearrangements and their association with hypoprolificacy in a representative 94 boar samples from a commercial nucleus herd. We identified three novel rearrangements between chromosomes 5 and 14, between chromosomes 9 and 10, and between chromosomes 10 and 12. In addition, we also detected a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 3 and 16 that has previously been detected in pig herds in France. The prevalence rate was 6.38% within the samples used in this study. All four rearrangements were found to have an association with hypoprolificacy. Further study and routine monitoring will be necessary to identify any further rearrangements that will allow breeders to prevent the propagation of reciprocal translocations from generation to generation within the Australian pig population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34440769
pii: cells10082000
doi: 10.3390/cells10082000
pmc: PMC8394656
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Australian Pork Research Institute Limited (APRIL)
ID : project grant (A3B-103)
Références
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Jan 08;10(1):
pubmed: 29316705
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;120(1-2):11-25
pubmed: 18467822
Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Nov;49(5):995-1013
pubmed: 1928105
Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 27;11(5):
pubmed: 33925534
Anim Genet. 2017 Aug;48(4):395-403
pubmed: 28497848
Chromosome Res. 2002;10(8):707-15
pubmed: 12575798
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;120(1-2):26-41
pubmed: 18467823
Hereditas. 1995;122(2):153-62
pubmed: 7558883
Genet Sel Evol. 2007 Sep-Oct;39(5):583-97
pubmed: 17897598
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Sep 12;48(1):66
pubmed: 27620715
Hum Hered. 1978;28(3):210-225
pubmed: 649178
Reprod Domest Anim. 2019 Oct;54 Suppl 4:98-101
pubmed: 31625227
Theriogenology. 2010 Jul 1;74(1):67-74
pubmed: 20171726
Hum Genet. 1978 Dec 29;45(3):259-82
pubmed: 738728
BMC Genet. 2018 Jul 6;19(1):41
pubmed: 29980191
Sci Rep. 2020 May 4;10(1):7471
pubmed: 32366875
Genes (Basel). 2019 Sep 30;10(10):
pubmed: 31575040