Do legislated carbon reduction targets influence pro-environmental behaviours in public hospital pharmacy departments? Using mixed methods to compare Australia and the UK.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 11 12 2020
accepted: 19 07 2021
entrez: 18 8 2021
pubmed: 19 8 2021
medline: 25 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pharmaceuticals and their packaging have a significant negative impact on the environment providing a very strong argument for action on the part of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians to engage with pro-environmental behaviours (PEBs) in their workplaces. The aims of this research were therefore to investigate in hospital pharmacists and pharmacy technicians, 1) factors affecting engagement with workplace PEBs, and 2) determine if legislated carbon reduction targets in the UK influenced workplace PEBs in the UK compared with Australia which does not have legislated carbon reduction targets. The environmentally responsible disposal of pharmaceutical waste was the PEB of interest in this study. A mixed methods research design was utilised and a conceptual model (key variables: environmental attitude, concern, and knowledge, and organisational factors) was developed to identify factors influencing workplace PEBs. Participants were from five hospitals in Queensland, Australia and five NHS hospitals in England, UK. There was no statistically significant difference in environmental attitude or concern between the two groups-most had a mid-environmental attitude score and low levels of environmental concern. Participants lacked knowledge of the issue and the link between the environment and public health. Both Australian and UK participants reported recycling packaging waste was not a priority in the hospital pharmacy workplace (even in hospitals with recycling capability) as hospitals focused on compliance with clinical (contaminated) and confidential waste streams. Environmental attitude, knowledge, and concern therefore appeared to be weak influences on intention to perform workplace PEBs with workplace social norms (compliance due to audits) appearing to be a significant mediator of action. The key difference between the cohorts was that UK pharmacists felt waste was not in the scope of their role, and therefore not their responsibility. This study identified that legislated carbon reduction targets did not influence hospital pharmacy workplace PEBs-neither cohort reported engaging significantly in workplace PEBs. UK Government and NHS sustainability policy did not appear to have disseminated to pharmacy department level of UK public hospitals to any great extent.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34407108
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255445
pii: PONE-D-20-38966
pmc: PMC8372918
doi:

Substances chimiques

Carbon 7440-44-0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0255445

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Psychol Monogr. 1966;80(1):1-28
pubmed: 5340840
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2011 Mar;23(2 Suppl):133S-43
pubmed: 21447548
J Environ Manage. 2017 Jul 15;197:384-392
pubmed: 28410516
Aust Health Rev. 2013 May;37(2):158-65
pubmed: 23489957
Biol Lett. 2013 Jun 26;9(4):20130492
pubmed: 23804293
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 09;11(6):e0157014
pubmed: 27280706
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):220-7
pubmed: 20367839
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Nov 1;23(6):646-659
pubmed: 28981654
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010 Sep;74(3):417-33
pubmed: 20805405
Waste Manag. 2005;25(6):606-15
pubmed: 15993345
Lancet. 2009 May 16;373(9676):1693-733
pubmed: 19447250
Int J Psychol. 2014 Jun;49(3):141-57
pubmed: 24821503
Psychol Health. 2011 Sep;26(9):1113-27
pubmed: 21929476
Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(10):768-9
pubmed: 14758440
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Jan;2(1):e27-e35
pubmed: 29615206

Auteurs

Judith A Singleton (JA)

School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Institute of Health and Biomedical Research (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Esther T-L Lau (ET)

School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Institute of Health and Biomedical Research (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Lisa M Nissen (LM)

School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Institute of Health and Biomedical Research (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH