Accuracy of half-guided implant placement with machine-driven or manual insertion: a prospective, randomized clinical study.
Accuracy
Dental implants
Guided surgery
Intraoral digital scan
Machine-driven implant insertion
Manual implant insertion
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
23
04
2021
accepted:
18
07
2021
pubmed:
18
8
2021
medline:
29
1
2022
entrez:
17
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the accuracy of implant placement performed with either a surgical motor or a torque wrench as part of a half-guided surgical protocol. Implant insertion with half-guided surgical protocol was utilized by surgical motor (machine-driven group) or torque wrench (manual group) in the posterior maxilla. After the healing period, accuracy comparison between planned and actual implant positions was performed based on preoperative cone beam computed tomography and postoperative digital intraoral scans. Coronal, apical, and angular deviations, insertion time, and insertion torque were evaluated. Forty patients were treated with 1 implant each; 20 implants were inserted with a surgical motor and 20 implants with a torque wrench. Global coronal and apical deviations were 1.20 ± 0.46 mm and 1.45 ± 0.79 mm in the machine-driven group, and 1.13 ± 0.38 mm and 1.18 ± 0.28 mm in the manual group (respectively). The mean angular deviation was 4.82 ± 2.07° in the machine-driven group and 4.11 ± 1.63° in the manual group. Mean insertion torque was 21.75 ± 9.75 Ncm in the machine-driven group, compared to 18.75 ± 7.05 Ncm in the manual group. Implant placement duration was 9.25 ± 1.86 s in the machine-driven group at a speed of 50 rpm, and 36.40 ± 8.15 s in the manual group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of accuracy and mean insertion torque, while machine-driven implant placement was significantly less time-consuming. Optimal implant placement accuracy utilized by half-guided surgical protocol can be achieved with both machine-driven and torque wrench insertion. ID: NCT04854239.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34401946
doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04087-0
pii: 10.1007/s00784-021-04087-0
pmc: PMC8791874
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04854239']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Pagination
1035-1043Subventions
Organisme : Hungarian Human Resources Development Operational Program
ID : EFOP-3.6.2-16-2017-00006
Organisme : NSK Europe GmbH
ID : Young Researchers Program
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
BouSerbal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, Steenberghe D (2002) Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 4:156–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00167.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00167.x
Zechner W, Bernhart T, Zauza K, Celar A, Watzek G (2001) Multidimensional osteodistraction for correction of implant malposition in edentulous segments. Clin Oral Implants Res 12(5):531–538. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120515.x
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120515.x
pubmed: 11564115
Duff RE, Razzoog ME (2006) Management of a partially edentulous patient with malpositioned implants, using all-ceramic abutments and all-ceramic restorations: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 96(5):309–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.027
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.027
pubmed: 17098491
Kemper R, Galmiklos A, Aroca S (2013) Surgical and prosthetic correction of malposed maxillary implants: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 33(5):575–581. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1199
doi: 10.11607/prd.1199
pubmed: 23998153
Varga E, Antal M, Major L, Kiscsatari R, Braunitzer G, Piffko J (2020) Guidance means accuracy: a randomized clinical trial on freehand versus guided dental implantation. Clin Oral Implants Res 31:417–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13578
doi: 10.1111/clr.13578
pubmed: 31958166
Brugnami F, Caleffi C (2005) Prosthetically driven implant placement. How to achieve the appropriate implant site development. Keio J Med 54:172–178. https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.54.172
doi: 10.2302/kjm.54.172
pubmed: 16452826
Vercruyssen M, Jacobs R, Van Assche N, Van Steenberghe D (2008) The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy. J Oral Rehab 35:454–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01816.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01816.x
Hämmerle C, Cordaro L, Assche N et al (2015) Digital technologies to support planning, treatment, and fabrication processes and outcome assessments in implant dentistry. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO consensus conference 2015. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:97–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12648
doi: 10.1111/clr.12648
pubmed: 26385624
Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A (2009) Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24:234–242
pubmed: 19492638
Al-Harbi S, Sun A (2009) Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results. Implant Dent 18:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31818c6a50
doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31818c6a50
pubmed: 19212237
Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Stefanelli L, Barbato E (2014) How does an error in positioning the template affect the accuracy of implants inserted using a single fixed mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.06.012
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.06.012
pubmed: 23916310
Van de Wiele G, Teughels W, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Temmerman A, Quirynen M (2015) The accuracy of guided surgery via mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical templates in the hands of surgeons with little experience. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:1489–1494. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12494
doi: 10.1111/clr.12494
pubmed: 25318961
Joda T, Derksen W, Wittneben JG, Kuehl S (2018) Static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) analysing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), economics and surgical complications: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 29(Suppl 16):359–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13136
doi: 10.1111/clr.13136
pubmed: 30328203
Buser D, von Arx T, ten Bruggenkate C, Weingart D (2000) Basic surgical principles with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 11:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1059.x
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1059.x
pubmed: 11168257
Kühl S, Zürcher S, Mahid T, Müller-Gerbl M, Filippi A, Cattin P (2013) Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 24(7):763–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02484.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02484.x
pubmed: 22551385
Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, Wismeijer D, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Tahmaseb A (2009) Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24(Suppl):92–109
pubmed: 19885437
Ozan O, Orhan K, Turkyilmaz I (2011) Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides. J Craniofac Surg 22(5):1755–1761. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e6305
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e6305
pubmed: 21959426
Ersoy A, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy E (2008) Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol 79:1339–1345. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.080059
doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.080059
pubmed: 18672982
Di Giacomo G, da Silva J, da Silva A, Paschoal G, Cury P, Szarf G (2012) Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation. J Periodontol 83:410–419. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110115
doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110115
pubmed: 21819249
Derksen W, Wismeijer D, Flügge T, Hassan B, Tahmaseb A (2019) (2019) The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. A prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 30(10):1005–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13514
doi: 10.1111/clr.13514
pubmed: 31330566
Vercruyssen M, Cox C, Coucke W, Naert I, Jacobs R, Quirynen M (2014) A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. J Clin Periodontol 41:717–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12231
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12231
pubmed: 24460748
Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W (2014) Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants Suppl 29:25–42. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.2
doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.2
Cassetta M, Stefanelli L, Giansanti M, Calasso S (2012) Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:655–663
pubmed: 22616060
Bover-Ramos F, Vina-Almunia J, Cervera-Ballester J, Penarrocha-Diago M, Garcia-Mira B (2018) Accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cadaver, clinical, and in vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 33:101–115. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5556
doi: 10.11607/jomi.5556
pubmed: 28632253
Cohnen M, Kemper J, Möbes O, Pawelzik J, Mödder U (2002) Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol 12:634–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300100928
doi: 10.1007/s003300100928
pubmed: 11870479
Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, Marchal G, Sanderink G, Jacobs R (2009) Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 71:461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.002
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.002
pubmed: 18639404
Loubele M, Guerrero M, Jacobs R, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D (2007) A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multi-slice spiral CT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22:446–454
pubmed: 17622012
Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A (2017) Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: an in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent 118:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024
pubmed: 28024822