The association of obesity with eating disorders risk: online survey of a large cohort of Russian-speaking individuals seeking medical weight correction assistance.
Abnormal eating behaviors
BMI
EAT-26
Obesity
Online survey
Journal
Journal of eating disorders
ISSN: 2050-2974
Titre abrégé: J Eat Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101610672
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Aug 2021
14 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
08
04
2021
accepted:
04
08
2021
entrez:
15
8
2021
pubmed:
16
8
2021
medline:
16
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Eating Disorders pose a serious health risk to individuals. Often, eating disorder symptoms are overlooked when assessing obesity risk. The current cross-sectional study was focused on the search of association between disordered eating behaviors evaluated by Eating Attitudes Test 26 (EAT-26) and obesity in a large cohort of Russian-speaking adults seeking online assistance with medical weight correction. The web-based cross-sectional study evaluated the data of online Eating Attitudes Test 26 (EAT-26) completed by 13,341 registered adult visitors of weight loss clinic website. The EAT-26 provides an overall score for potential eating disorders risk, as well as scores for three subscales: Bulimia, dieting, and oral control. Additional self-reported information about sex, weight, height, and age of respondents was used for analysis. The nonparametric analysis of variance and binominal logistic regression modeling were applied to search for an association between obesity and EAT-26 total score and subscales scores. The critical level of the significance was considered as α = 0.05. Women (94%) had lower BMI values but higher EAT-26 total score than men, which was indicated as statistically significant by a Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test (Z = - 11.80, p < 0.0001). Logistic regression for the whole cohort revealed that Bulimia subscale score was associated with higher risk of obesity (OR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05) whereas higher score of EAT-26 oral control subscale was associated with decreased risk of obesity (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.91-0.95). Separate analysis for men and women showed that in men higher obesity risk was associated with higher oral control subscale scores (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.11); while in women both dieting and bulimia subscales scores were associated with higher obesity risk (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03 and OR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05, respectively). Older age was associated with obesity risk for both women and men. In a large cohort of individuals seeking medical weight correction assistance, the risk of obesity was associated with the higher EAT-26 scores, age, and sex. Moreover, different eating disorder risk profiles were associated with obesity in men and women. Higher oral control subscale score was associated with decreased risk of obesity in women, but with higher risk in men. Older age was a shared obesity risk factor for both sexes. Therefore, the use of EAT-26 would facilitate individual diagnostic assessment for specific eating disorders in different sub-cohorts. Further assessment of separate EAT-26 subscales may be important to predict sex-/age-specific risks of obesity that implies their study in the future. Obesity is a significant health problem. Different factors (e.g. social, biological, and behavioral) are important for their successful treatment. Abnormal eating behaviors may be one of the most likely predictors of increased body weight. This study aims to determine whether there is a significant association between obesity and scores on the eating behavior questionnaire-Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26)-in a large cohort of adults seeking medical weight correction assistance at a private weight loss clinic web-site. According to the study results, the association was shown for the male sex, older age, and higher Bulimia scores as measured on the EAT-26. Moreover, different EAT-26 scales were associated with obesity risks in women and men subgroups, while older age was a shared risk factor for obesity in both sexes. The findings may suggest sex-/age-specific diagnostic approach and treatment strategies for individuals with obesity.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Eating Disorders pose a serious health risk to individuals. Often, eating disorder symptoms are overlooked when assessing obesity risk. The current cross-sectional study was focused on the search of association between disordered eating behaviors evaluated by Eating Attitudes Test 26 (EAT-26) and obesity in a large cohort of Russian-speaking adults seeking online assistance with medical weight correction.
METHODS
METHODS
The web-based cross-sectional study evaluated the data of online Eating Attitudes Test 26 (EAT-26) completed by 13,341 registered adult visitors of weight loss clinic website. The EAT-26 provides an overall score for potential eating disorders risk, as well as scores for three subscales: Bulimia, dieting, and oral control. Additional self-reported information about sex, weight, height, and age of respondents was used for analysis. The nonparametric analysis of variance and binominal logistic regression modeling were applied to search for an association between obesity and EAT-26 total score and subscales scores. The critical level of the significance was considered as α = 0.05.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Women (94%) had lower BMI values but higher EAT-26 total score than men, which was indicated as statistically significant by a Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test (Z = - 11.80, p < 0.0001). Logistic regression for the whole cohort revealed that Bulimia subscale score was associated with higher risk of obesity (OR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05) whereas higher score of EAT-26 oral control subscale was associated with decreased risk of obesity (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.91-0.95). Separate analysis for men and women showed that in men higher obesity risk was associated with higher oral control subscale scores (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.11); while in women both dieting and bulimia subscales scores were associated with higher obesity risk (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03 and OR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05, respectively). Older age was associated with obesity risk for both women and men.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In a large cohort of individuals seeking medical weight correction assistance, the risk of obesity was associated with the higher EAT-26 scores, age, and sex. Moreover, different eating disorder risk profiles were associated with obesity in men and women. Higher oral control subscale score was associated with decreased risk of obesity in women, but with higher risk in men. Older age was a shared obesity risk factor for both sexes. Therefore, the use of EAT-26 would facilitate individual diagnostic assessment for specific eating disorders in different sub-cohorts. Further assessment of separate EAT-26 subscales may be important to predict sex-/age-specific risks of obesity that implies their study in the future. Obesity is a significant health problem. Different factors (e.g. social, biological, and behavioral) are important for their successful treatment. Abnormal eating behaviors may be one of the most likely predictors of increased body weight. This study aims to determine whether there is a significant association between obesity and scores on the eating behavior questionnaire-Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26)-in a large cohort of adults seeking medical weight correction assistance at a private weight loss clinic web-site. According to the study results, the association was shown for the male sex, older age, and higher Bulimia scores as measured on the EAT-26. Moreover, different EAT-26 scales were associated with obesity risks in women and men subgroups, while older age was a shared risk factor for obesity in both sexes. The findings may suggest sex-/age-specific diagnostic approach and treatment strategies for individuals with obesity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34391485
doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00456-y
pii: 10.1186/s40337-021-00456-y
pmc: PMC8364085
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Jul;111(7):1004-11
pubmed: 21703378
Metabolism. 2019 Mar;92:6-10
pubmed: 30253139
Eat Weight Disord. 1998 Dec;3(4):188-94
pubmed: 10728170
Obes Rev. 2014 Jun;15(6):453-61
pubmed: 24636206
Psychol Med. 1982 Nov;12(4):871-8
pubmed: 6961471
Span J Psychol. 2010 Nov;13(2):1044-56
pubmed: 20977051
Ethn Health. 2004 Aug;9(3):253-66
pubmed: 15369999
Obes Facts. 2019;12(1):103-114
pubmed: 30844809
Eat Weight Disord. 1997 Sep;2(3):117-24
pubmed: 14655834
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jan;1411(1):96-105
pubmed: 29044551
Eat Weight Disord. 2020 Dec;25(6):1727-1737
pubmed: 31741253
Appetite. 2015 Dec;95:96-100
pubmed: 26145273
Adv Nutr. 2019 Mar 1;10(2):205-218
pubmed: 30801613
Eat Weight Disord. 2005 Jun;10(2):76-82
pubmed: 16114220
Curr Obes Rep. 2018 Sep;7(3):235-246
pubmed: 30069717
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2017 Apr 1;29(2):
pubmed: 26536573
Int J Nurs Pract. 2019 Feb;25(1):e12694
pubmed: 30117224
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1337-1343
pubmed: 29948810
Obes Rev. 2004 Aug;5(3):145-51
pubmed: 15245383
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Aug 16;3(3):e56
pubmed: 28814377
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011 Jun;6(2-2):e1-11
pubmed: 21247271
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 Nov;28(11):1456-62
pubmed: 15314631