Association Between the Physician Quality Score in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System and Hospital Performance in Hospital Compare in the First Year of the Program.
Adult
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.
Clinical Competence
/ standards
Cross-Sectional Studies
Data Analysis
Failure to Rescue, Health Care
/ standards
Female
Hospitals
/ standards
Humans
Linear Models
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Patient Readmission
/ standards
Physicians
/ standards
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Program Evaluation
Quality Indicators, Health Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Reimbursement, Incentive
/ standards
Surgeons
/ standards
United States
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 08 2021
02 08 2021
Historique:
entrez:
3
8
2021
pubmed:
4
8
2021
medline:
6
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The scientific validity of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) quality score as a measure of hospital-level patient outcomes is unknown. To examine whether better physician performance on the MIPS quality score is associated with better hospital outcomes. This cross-sectional study of 38 830 physicians used data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician Compare (2017) merged with CMS Hospital Compare data. Data analysis was conducted from September to November 2020. Linear regression was used to examine the association between physician MIPS quality scores aggregated at the hospital level and hospitalwide measures of (1) postoperative complications, (2) failure to rescue, (3) individual postoperative complications, and (4) readmissions. The study cohort of 38 830 clinicians (5198 [14.6%] women; 12 103 [31.6%] with 11-20 years in practice) included 6580 (17.2%) general surgeons, 8978 (23.4%) orthopedic surgeons, 1617 (4.2%) vascular surgeons, 582 (1.5%) cardiac surgeons, 904 (2.4%) thoracic surgeons, 18 149 (47.4%) anesthesiologists, and 1520 (4.0%) intensivists at 3055 hospitals. The MIPS quality score was not associated with the hospital composite rate of postoperative complications. MIPS quality scores for vascular surgeons in the 11th to 25th percentile, compared with those in the 51st to 100th percentile, were associated with a 0.55-percentage point higher hospital rate of failure to rescue (95% CI, 0.06-1.04 percentage points; P = .03). MIPS quality scores for cardiac surgeons in the 1st to 10th percentile, compared with those in the 51st to 100th percentile, were associated with a 0.41-percentage point higher hospital coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) mortality rate (95% CI, 0.10-0.71 percentage points; P = .01). MIPS quality scores for cardiac surgeons in the 1st to 10th percentile and 11th to 25th percentile, compared with those in the 51st to 100th percentile, were associated with 0.65-percentage point (95% CI, 0.013-1.16 percentage points; P = .02) and 0.48-percentage point (95% CI, 0.07-0.90 percentage points; P = .02) higher hospital CABG readmission rates, respectively. In this study, better performance on the physician MIPS quality score was associated with better hospital surgical outcomes for some physician specialties during the first year of MIPS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34342653
pii: 2782631
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18449
pmc: PMC8335582
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2118449Subventions
Organisme : NIMHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 MD012422
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1757-1761
pubmed: 29668361
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Mar;35(3):401-6
pubmed: 26953292
Anesth Analg. 2011 Apr;112(4):958-66
pubmed: 21385976
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Sep;39(9):1504-1512
pubmed: 32897781
JAMA. 2009 Feb 25;301(8):831-41
pubmed: 19244190
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;194(6):1564-72; discussion 1072-5
pubmed: 16731072
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Nov 15;51(10):1147-56
pubmed: 20946067
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Dec;211(6):705-14
pubmed: 21109157
Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1048-1055
pubmed: 31850998
JAMA. 2019 Mar 19;321(11):1069-1080
pubmed: 30874755
JAMA. 2020 Sep 8;324(10):975-983
pubmed: 32897345
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Sep 2;161(5):365-7
pubmed: 24957469
JAMA. 2019 Mar 26;321(12):1157-1158
pubmed: 30830150
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Sep;39(9):1513-1521
pubmed: 32897783
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Sep;2(5):407-13
pubmed: 20031870
JAMA. 2014 Aug 6;312(5):543-4
pubmed: 25096694
BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8
pubmed: 17947786
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Sep;39(9):1495-1503
pubmed: 32897780
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1614-1616
pubmed: 32343321
Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Mar;67(3):417-22
pubmed: 26526035
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Aug;29(8):1469-75
pubmed: 20679649
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jan;17(1 Pt B):110-117
pubmed: 31918866
Ann Surg. 2020 Mar;271(3):475-483
pubmed: 30188401
Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):143-8
pubmed: 19106690
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1087-91
pubmed: 16980149
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):146-148
pubmed: 29181496