Vertebral bone marrow T2* mapping using chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation in the quantitative analysis of lumbar osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures.
Osteoporosis
T2* mapping
bone density
chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
spine
Journal
Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
ISSN: 2223-4292
Titre abrégé: Quant Imaging Med Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101577942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
19
12
2020
accepted:
07
04
2021
entrez:
3
8
2021
pubmed:
4
8
2021
medline:
4
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation techniques have been used for fat quantification [proton density fat fraction (PDFF)], but they also enable the assessment of bone marrow T2*, which has previously been reported to be a potential biomarker for osteoporosis and may give insight into the cause of vertebral fractures (i.e., osteoporotic The 32 patients (78.1% with low-energy osteopenic/osteoporotic fractures, mean age 72.3±9.8 years, 76% women; 21.9% with high-energy traumatic fractures, 47.3±12.8 years, no women) were frequency-matched for age and sex to subjects without vertebral fractures (n=20). All study patients underwent 3T-MRI of the lumbar spine including sagittally acquired spoiled gradient echo sequences for chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation, from which T2* values were obtained. Volumetric trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone parameters describing the three-dimensional structural integrity of trabecular bone were derived from quantitative CT. Associations between T2* measurements, fracture status and trabecular bone parameters were assessed using multivariable linear regression models. Mean T2* values of non fractured vertebrae in all patients showed a significant correlation with BMD (r=-0.65, P<0.001), trabecular number (TbN) (r=-0.56, P<0.001) and trabecular spacing (TbSp) (r=0.61, P<0.001); patients with low-energy osteoporotic vertebral fractures showed significantly higher mean T2* values than those with traumatic fractures (13.6±4.3 T2* mapping of vertebral bone marrow using using chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation allows for assessing osteoporosis as well as the trabecular microstructure and enables a radiation-free differentiation between patients with low-energy osteoporotic and high-energy traumatic vertebral fractures, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for bone fragility.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation techniques have been used for fat quantification [proton density fat fraction (PDFF)], but they also enable the assessment of bone marrow T2*, which has previously been reported to be a potential biomarker for osteoporosis and may give insight into the cause of vertebral fractures (i.e., osteoporotic
METHODS
METHODS
The 32 patients (78.1% with low-energy osteopenic/osteoporotic fractures, mean age 72.3±9.8 years, 76% women; 21.9% with high-energy traumatic fractures, 47.3±12.8 years, no women) were frequency-matched for age and sex to subjects without vertebral fractures (n=20). All study patients underwent 3T-MRI of the lumbar spine including sagittally acquired spoiled gradient echo sequences for chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation, from which T2* values were obtained. Volumetric trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone parameters describing the three-dimensional structural integrity of trabecular bone were derived from quantitative CT. Associations between T2* measurements, fracture status and trabecular bone parameters were assessed using multivariable linear regression models.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Mean T2* values of non fractured vertebrae in all patients showed a significant correlation with BMD (r=-0.65, P<0.001), trabecular number (TbN) (r=-0.56, P<0.001) and trabecular spacing (TbSp) (r=0.61, P<0.001); patients with low-energy osteoporotic vertebral fractures showed significantly higher mean T2* values than those with traumatic fractures (13.6±4.3
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
T2* mapping of vertebral bone marrow using using chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation allows for assessing osteoporosis as well as the trabecular microstructure and enables a radiation-free differentiation between patients with low-energy osteoporotic and high-energy traumatic vertebral fractures, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for bone fragility.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34341744
doi: 10.21037/qims-20-1373
pii: qims-11-08-3715
pmc: PMC8245952
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3715-3725Informations de copyright
2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-1373). DCK receives grant support from Philips Healthcare. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Nov;108:59-65
pubmed: 30396672
Eur Radiol. 2013 Dec;23(12):3432-9
pubmed: 23812246
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43367
pubmed: 22937040
J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Sep;29(9):1926-8
pubmed: 24956507
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4980-4989
pubmed: 30790025
J Lipid Res. 2008 Sep;49(9):2055-62
pubmed: 18509197
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17(4):473-88
pubmed: 26605922
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Mar;10(3):554-567
pubmed: 32269917
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Nov;66(5):1312-26
pubmed: 21452279
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24 Suppl):2S-11S
pubmed: 9431638
Eur Radiol. 2019 Nov;29(11):6355-6363
pubmed: 31115622
Bone. 2013 Jan;52(1):393-9
pubmed: 23103928
NMR Biomed. 2006 Nov;19(7):731-64
pubmed: 17075953
Bone. 2013 Nov;57(1):155-63
pubmed: 23899635
NMR Biomed. 2015 Nov;28(11):1535-42
pubmed: 26423583
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Feb 22;15(1):18
pubmed: 32088768
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Feb;49(2):390-399
pubmed: 30390360
Calcif Tissue Int. 2007 Jun;80(6):366-73
pubmed: 17520165
Radiology. 2005 Sep;236(3):945-51
pubmed: 16055699
Radiology. 1991 Jun;179(3):615-21
pubmed: 2027962
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Sep;78(3):984-996
pubmed: 27797100
Magn Reson Med. 1991 Nov;22(1):111-27
pubmed: 1798386
Clin Radiol. 2014 Mar;69(3):254-62
pubmed: 24286935
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Feb;47(2):332-353
pubmed: 28570033
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:312142
pubmed: 24987676
Magn Reson Med. 2021 Mar;85(3):1697-1712
pubmed: 33151604
Calcif Tissue Int. 2006 Feb;78(2):78-89
pubmed: 16467973
Radiographics. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):1433-49
pubmed: 19755604
NMR Biomed. 2014 Oct;27(10):1159-66
pubmed: 25088271
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):e140-5
pubmed: 20851544
Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:136
pubmed: 24113837
Am J Med. 1993 Jun;94(6):646-50
pubmed: 8506892