A wearable ring-shaped inertial system to identify action planning impairments during reach-to-grasp sequences: a pilot study.
Action planning
Dysexecutive syndrome
Executive functions
Mild cognitive impairment
Motor programming
Reach-to-grasp
Journal
Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1743-0003
Titre abrégé: J Neuroeng Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101232233
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 07 2021
27 07 2021
Historique:
received:
25
11
2020
accepted:
16
07
2021
entrez:
28
7
2021
pubmed:
29
7
2021
medline:
26
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The progressive ageing of the population is leading to an increasing number of people affected by cognitive decline, including disorders in executive functions (EFs), such as action planning. Current procedures to evaluate cognitive decline are based on neuropsychological tests, but novel methods and approaches start to be investigated. Reach-to-grasp (RG) protocols have shown that intentions can influence the EFs of action planning. In this work, we proposed a novel ring-shaped wearable inertial device, SensRing, to measure kinematic parameters during RG and after-grasp (AG) tasks with different end-goals. The aim is to evaluate whether SensRing can characterize the motor performances of people affected by Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (MND) with impairment in EFs. Eight Individuals with dysexecutive MND, named d-MND, were compared to ten older healthy subjects (HC). They were asked to reach and grasp a can with three different intentions: to drink (DRINK), to place it on a target (PLACE), or to pass it to a partner (PASS). Twenty-one kinematic parameters were extracted from SensRing inertial data. Seven parameters resulted able to differentiate between HC and d-MND in the RG phase, and 8 features resulted significant in the AG phase. d-MND, indeed, had longer reaction times (in RG PLACE), slower peak velocities (in RG PLACE and PASS, in AG DRINK and PLACE), longer deceleration phases (in all RG and AG DRINK), and higher variability (in RG PLACE, in AG DRINK and PASS). Furthermore, d-MND showed no significant differences among conditions, suggesting that impairments in EFs influence their capabilities in modulating the action planning based on the end-goal. Based on this explorative study, the system might have the potential for objectifying the clinical assessment of people affected by d-MND by administering an easy motor test. Although these preliminary results have to be investigated in-depth in a larger sample, the portability, wearability, accuracy, and ease-of use of the system make the SensRing potentially appliable for remote applications at home, including analysis of protocols for neuromotor rehabilitation in patients affected by MND.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The progressive ageing of the population is leading to an increasing number of people affected by cognitive decline, including disorders in executive functions (EFs), such as action planning. Current procedures to evaluate cognitive decline are based on neuropsychological tests, but novel methods and approaches start to be investigated. Reach-to-grasp (RG) protocols have shown that intentions can influence the EFs of action planning. In this work, we proposed a novel ring-shaped wearable inertial device, SensRing, to measure kinematic parameters during RG and after-grasp (AG) tasks with different end-goals. The aim is to evaluate whether SensRing can characterize the motor performances of people affected by Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (MND) with impairment in EFs.
METHODS
Eight Individuals with dysexecutive MND, named d-MND, were compared to ten older healthy subjects (HC). They were asked to reach and grasp a can with three different intentions: to drink (DRINK), to place it on a target (PLACE), or to pass it to a partner (PASS). Twenty-one kinematic parameters were extracted from SensRing inertial data.
RESULTS
Seven parameters resulted able to differentiate between HC and d-MND in the RG phase, and 8 features resulted significant in the AG phase. d-MND, indeed, had longer reaction times (in RG PLACE), slower peak velocities (in RG PLACE and PASS, in AG DRINK and PLACE), longer deceleration phases (in all RG and AG DRINK), and higher variability (in RG PLACE, in AG DRINK and PASS). Furthermore, d-MND showed no significant differences among conditions, suggesting that impairments in EFs influence their capabilities in modulating the action planning based on the end-goal.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on this explorative study, the system might have the potential for objectifying the clinical assessment of people affected by d-MND by administering an easy motor test. Although these preliminary results have to be investigated in-depth in a larger sample, the portability, wearability, accuracy, and ease-of use of the system make the SensRing potentially appliable for remote applications at home, including analysis of protocols for neuromotor rehabilitation in patients affected by MND.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34315497
doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00913-4
pii: 10.1186/s12984-021-00913-4
pmc: PMC8314592
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
118Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Sep;17(3):557-64
pubmed: 17446089
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 16;20(10):
pubmed: 32429331
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Sep;132(1):68-79
pubmed: 19591968
J Gerontol. 1994 Jan;49(1):P1-7
pubmed: 8282979
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 2;11(1):7449
pubmed: 33811226
J Neuropsychol. 2013 Sep;7(2):193-224
pubmed: 24007368
Front Neurol. 2014 Jan 23;5:6
pubmed: 24478753
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Can J Psychol. 1987 Sep;41(3):365-78
pubmed: 3502905
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;27(4):301-9
pubmed: 19252401
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Oct;134(3):353-62
pubmed: 11045360
Cortex. 2015 Sep;70:179-88
pubmed: 25804938
Exp Brain Res. 2013 May;226(3):421-9
pubmed: 23455727
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Sep;151:134-42
pubmed: 24977936
Neurology. 2000 Dec 12;55(11):1621-6
pubmed: 11113214
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004 Dec 14;1(1):11
pubmed: 15679937
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020 Jul;2020:4020-4023
pubmed: 33018881
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 05;20(9):
pubmed: 32380675
J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Dec;43(12):2793-806
pubmed: 23619948
Br Med Bull. 2009;92:135-52
pubmed: 19776035
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;119:79-84
pubmed: 16404019
Psychogeriatrics. 2017 Nov;17(6):382-388
pubmed: 28295921
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 01;6:117
pubmed: 22557961
Ann Neurol. 2010 Dec;68(6):855-64
pubmed: 21194155
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Feb;33(2):200-208
pubmed: 30608020
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Feb;185(1):111-9
pubmed: 17909766
Motor Control. 2006 Oct;10(4):311-29
pubmed: 17293615