Contrasting Similar Words Facilitates Second Language Vocabulary Learning in Children by Sharpening Lexical Representations.

contrasting language instruction lexical representations representational specificity second language learning vocabulary

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 30 03 2021
accepted: 08 06 2021
entrez: 23 7 2021
pubmed: 24 7 2021
medline: 24 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study considers one of the cognitive mechanisms underlying the development of second language (L2) vocabulary in children: The differentiation and sharpening of lexical representations. We propose that sharpening is triggered by an implicit comparison of similar representations, a process we call contrasting. We investigate whether integrating contrasting in a learning method in which children contrast orthographically and semantically similar L2 words facilitates learning of those words by sharpening their new lexical representations. In our study, 48 Dutch-speaking children learned unfamiliar orthographically and semantically similar English words in a multiple-choice learning task. One half of the group learned the similar words by contrasting them, while the other half did not contrast them. Their word knowledge was measured immediately after learning as well as 1 week later. Contrasting was found to facilitate learning by leading to more precise lexical representations. However, only highly skilled readers benefitted from contrasting. Our findings offer novel insights into the development of L2 lexical representations from fuzzy to more precise, and have potential implications for education.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34295290
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.688160
pmc: PMC8290082
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

688160

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Baxter, Droop, van den Hurk, Bekkering, Dijkstra and Leoné.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Jul;97(3):165-82
pubmed: 17408686
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jan;15(1):20-7
pubmed: 20951630
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jul;34(4):918-28
pubmed: 18605878
Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):3-29
pubmed: 15631549
Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1558-68
pubmed: 17692305
Psychol Rev. 1998 Jan;105(1):158-73
pubmed: 9450375
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1986 Mar;115(1):39-61
pubmed: 2937873
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Apr;28(2):349-66
pubmed: 11999859
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Feb;27(1):15-23
pubmed: 31422528
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Oct;126:395-411
pubmed: 25015421
Cognition. 2009 Feb;110(2):273-8
pubmed: 19108820
Mem Cognit. 1997 Jan;25(1):47-56
pubmed: 9046869
Percept Psychophys. 2000 Nov;62(8):1668-80
pubmed: 11140187
Psychol Sci. 2012;23(11):1337-44
pubmed: 23034566
Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):556-9
pubmed: 1736359
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):204-56
pubmed: 11212628
Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:585-612
pubmed: 9496632
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jan;31(1):3-8
pubmed: 15641900
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Feb;89(2):874-86
pubmed: 2016438
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Aug;46(8):1590-1610
pubmed: 32162959
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Aug;21(4):861-83
pubmed: 24366687
Mem Cognit. 2012 May;40(4):514-27
pubmed: 22161209
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1520-1523
pubmed: 27659480
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Jun;46(2):416-28
pubmed: 24142834
Percept Psychophys. 1999 Jul;61(5):977-85
pubmed: 10499009
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Apr;14(2):225-9
pubmed: 17694905
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 21;7:1345
pubmed: 27708592
Psychol Bull. 1998 Jan;123(1):71-99
pubmed: 9461854
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Apr;71(4):808-816
pubmed: 28326995
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Oct;8(10):472-8
pubmed: 15450512
Mem Cognit. 2015 Jan;43(1):14-26
pubmed: 25123774
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Jun 1;30(5):506-528
pubmed: 25984550
Nature. 2002 Feb 14;415(6873):790-3
pubmed: 11845209

Auteurs

Peta Baxter (P)

Donders Centre for Cognition, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Mienke Droop (M)

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Marianne van den Hurk (M)

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Harold Bekkering (H)

Donders Centre for Cognition, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Ton Dijkstra (T)

Donders Centre for Cognition, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Frank Leoné (F)

Donders Centre for Cognition, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH