Scalable Sparse Testing Genomic Selection Strategy for Early Yield Testing Stage.
CDmean
factor analytic
genomic selection
prediction accuracy
preliminary yield trials
unstructured model
Journal
Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
26
01
2021
accepted:
25
05
2021
entrez:
9
7
2021
pubmed:
10
7
2021
medline:
10
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To enable a scalable sparse testing genomic selection (GS) strategy at preliminary yield trials in the CIMMYT maize breeding program, optimal approaches to incorporate genotype by environment interaction (GEI) in genomic prediction models are explored. Two cross-validation schemes were evaluated: CV1, predicting the genetic merit of new bi-parental populations that have been evaluated in some environments and not others, and CV2, predicting the genetic merit of half of a bi-parental population that has been phenotyped in some environments and not others using the coefficient of determination (CDmean) to determine optimized subsets of a full-sib family to be evaluated in each environment. We report similar prediction accuracies in CV1 and CV2, however, CV2 has an intuitive appeal in that all bi-parental populations have representation across environments, allowing efficient use of information across environments. It is also ideal for building robust historical data because all individuals of a full-sib family have phenotypic data, albeit in different environments. Results show that grouping of environments according to similar growing/management conditions improved prediction accuracy and reduced computational requirements, providing a scalable, parsimonious approach to multi-environmental trials and GS in early testing stages. We further demonstrate that complementing the full-sib calibration set with optimized historical data results in improved prediction accuracy for the cross-validation schemes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34239521
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.658978
pmc: PMC8259603
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
658978Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Atanda, Olsen, Crossa, Burgueño, Rincent, Dzidzienyo, Beyene, Gowda, Dreher, Boddupalli, Tongoona, Danquah, Olaoye and Robbins.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor declared a past co-authorship with several of the authors JC, YB, MG, JB, and PB.
Références
Genetics. 2014 Sep;198(1):3-16
pubmed: 25236445
G3 (Bethesda). 2017 Nov 6;7(11):3571-3586
pubmed: 28916649
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Jan 30;41:21
pubmed: 19284520
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 May 03;6(5):1313-26
pubmed: 26976443
Biometrics. 2001 Dec;57(4):1138-47
pubmed: 11764254
Genetics. 2012 Oct;192(2):715-28
pubmed: 22865733
J Anim Breed Genet. 2019 Jul;136(4):279-300
pubmed: 31247682
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 May 06;47:38
pubmed: 25943105
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Nov 22;10:1502
pubmed: 31824533
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Mar 27;11:353
pubmed: 32292411
Theor Appl Genet. 2021 Jan;134(1):279-294
pubmed: 33037897