Scanning electron microscopy preparation of the cellular actin cortex: A quantitative comparison between critical point drying and hexamethyldisilazane drying.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 14 01 2021
accepted: 21 06 2021
entrez: 8 7 2021
pubmed: 9 7 2021
medline: 24 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The cellular cortex is an approximately 200-nm-thick actin network that lies just beneath the cell membrane. It is responsible for the mechanical properties of cells, and as such, it is involved in many cellular processes, including cell migration and cellular interactions with the environment. To develop a clear view of this dense structure, high-resolution imaging is essential. As one such technique, electron microscopy, involves complex sample preparation procedures. The final drying of these samples has significant influence on potential artifacts, like cell shrinkage and the formation of artifactual holes in the actin cortex. In this study, we compared the three most used final sample drying procedures: critical-point drying (CPD), CPD with lens tissue (CPD-LT), and hexamethyldisilazane drying. We show that both hexamethyldisilazane and CPD-LT lead to fewer artifactual mesh holes within the actin cortex than CPD. Moreover, CPD-LT leads to significant reduction in cell height compared to hexamethyldisilazane and CPD. We conclude that the final drying procedure should be chosen according to the reduction in cell height, and so CPD-LT, or according to the spatial separation of the single layers of the actin cortex, and so hexamethyldisilazane.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34234360
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254165
pii: PONE-D-21-01439
pmc: PMC8263306
doi:

Substances chimiques

Actins 0
Organosilicon Compounds 0
hexamethylsilazane H36C68P1BH

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0254165

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Genes Cells. 2015 Feb;20(2):85-94
pubmed: 25440894
J Microsc. 1997 Apr;186(Pt 1):84-7
pubmed: 9159923
Sci Adv. 2017 Jun 21;3(6):e1603032
pubmed: 28691087
J Microsc. 1977 May;110(1):51-7
pubmed: 409847
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 May;1773(5):642-52
pubmed: 16926057
Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2017 May;86:37-41
pubmed: 28323208
Nat Commun. 2017 Feb 13;8:14347
pubmed: 28194011
Stain Technol. 1983 Nov;58(6):347-51
pubmed: 6679126
J Electron Microsc (Tokyo). 2003;52(4):429-33
pubmed: 14599106
Biomaterials. 2015 Aug;61:327-38
pubmed: 26043061
Mol Reprod Dev. 2015 Jul-Aug;82(7-8):518-29
pubmed: 26153368
PLoS One. 2017 May 31;12(5):e0176839
pubmed: 28562683
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:289817
pubmed: 25610902
Scanning. 2012 Jan-Feb;34(1):12-25
pubmed: 22532079
Physiol Rev. 2008 Apr;88(2):489-513
pubmed: 18391171
Biophys J. 2015 Mar 24;108(6):1330-1340
pubmed: 25809247
J Cell Sci. 2017 Oct 15;130(20):3427-3435
pubmed: 29032357
Nat Methods. 2012 Jan 08;9(2):185-8
pubmed: 22231642
Ophthalmic Res. 1986;18(4):203-8
pubmed: 3534677
Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2012 May;Chapter 2:Unit 2B.2.
pubmed: 22549162
Biophys J. 2010 Oct 20;99(8):2479-87
pubmed: 20959088
Nat Cell Biol. 2017 Jun;19(6):689-697
pubmed: 28530659
Biophys J. 2015 Aug 18;109(4):687-98
pubmed: 26287621
Scanning. 2016 Nov;38(6):625-633
pubmed: 26878999
J Struct Biol. 2012 Apr;178(1):19-28
pubmed: 22387240
Ann Ophthalmol. 1980 Oct;12(10):1165-7
pubmed: 7025725
Med Image Anal. 1998 Jun;2(2):143-68
pubmed: 10646760
Biophys J. 2008 Mar 1;94(5):1836-53
pubmed: 17921219
J Struct Biol. 1995 Nov-Dec;115(3):290-303
pubmed: 8573471
Cytometry A. 2004 Apr;58(2):167-76
pubmed: 15057970
Sci Rep. 2014 Aug 29;4:6213
pubmed: 25169063
Curr Biol. 2014 Jul 21;24(14):1628-1635
pubmed: 25017211
Science. 1969 Feb 21;163(3869):817-8
pubmed: 17807989
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2019 Dec;1866(12):118516
pubmed: 31348954
FASEB J. 2021 May;35(5):e21582
pubmed: 33835502
J Cell Sci. 2018 Jul 19;131(14):
pubmed: 30026344

Auteurs

Moritz Schu (M)

Leibniz Institute for New Materials (INM), Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.
Center for Biophysics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.

Emmanuel Terriac (E)

Leibniz Institute for New Materials (INM), Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.

Marcus Koch (M)

Leibniz Institute for New Materials (INM), Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.

Stephan Paschke (S)

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Franziska Lautenschläger (F)

Leibniz Institute for New Materials (INM), Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.
Center for Biophysics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.

Daniel A D Flormann (DAD)

Leibniz Institute for New Materials (INM), Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.
Center for Biophysics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH