A case with massive hemobilia long-term after internal drainage surgery for congenital biliary dilation.

Choledochal–gastrointestinal anastomosis (internal drainage surgery) Congenital biliary dilation Hemobilia

Journal

Surgical case reports
ISSN: 2198-7793
Titre abrégé: Surg Case Rep
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101662125

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 22 04 2021
accepted: 24 06 2021
entrez: 7 7 2021
pubmed: 8 7 2021
medline: 8 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Currently, there is an unwavering consensus that the standard surgery for congenital biliary dilation (CBD) is extrahepatic bile duct resection and choledochojejunostomy. However, decades prior, choledochocyst-gastrointestinal anastomosis without extrahepatic bile duct resection (internal drainage surgery, IDS) was preferred for CBD because of its simplicity. Currently, there is almost no chance of a surgeon encountering a patient who has undergone old-fashioned IDS, which has been completely obsolete due to the risk of carcinogenesis from the remaining bile duct. Moreover, the pathological condition long after IDS is unclear. Herein, we report a case of life-threatening bile duct bleeding as well as carcinoma of the bile duct 62 years after IDS in a patient with CBD. An 82-year-old Japanese woman with hemorrhagic shock due to gastrointestinal bleeding was transferred to our hospital. She had a medical history of unspecified surgery for CBD at the age of 20. Based on imaging findings and an understanding of the historical transition of the surgical procedure for CBD, the cause of gastrointestinal bleeding was determined to be rupture of the pseudoaneurysm of the dilated bile duct that remained after IDS. Hemostasis was successfully performed by transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in an emergency setting. Then, elective surgery for extrahepatic bile duct resection and choledochojejunostomy was performed to prevent rebleeding. Pathological examination revealed severely and chronically inflamed mucosa of the bile duct. Additionally, cholangiocarcinoma (Tis, N0, M0, pStage 0) was incidentally revealed. It has been indicated that not only carcinogenesis, but also a risk of life-threatening bleeding exists due to long-lasting chronic inflammation to the remnant bile duct after IDS for CBD. Additionally, both knowledge of which CBD operation was performed, and an accurate clinical history are important for the diagnosis of hemobilia.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Currently, there is an unwavering consensus that the standard surgery for congenital biliary dilation (CBD) is extrahepatic bile duct resection and choledochojejunostomy. However, decades prior, choledochocyst-gastrointestinal anastomosis without extrahepatic bile duct resection (internal drainage surgery, IDS) was preferred for CBD because of its simplicity. Currently, there is almost no chance of a surgeon encountering a patient who has undergone old-fashioned IDS, which has been completely obsolete due to the risk of carcinogenesis from the remaining bile duct. Moreover, the pathological condition long after IDS is unclear. Herein, we report a case of life-threatening bile duct bleeding as well as carcinoma of the bile duct 62 years after IDS in a patient with CBD.
CASE PRESENTATION METHODS
An 82-year-old Japanese woman with hemorrhagic shock due to gastrointestinal bleeding was transferred to our hospital. She had a medical history of unspecified surgery for CBD at the age of 20. Based on imaging findings and an understanding of the historical transition of the surgical procedure for CBD, the cause of gastrointestinal bleeding was determined to be rupture of the pseudoaneurysm of the dilated bile duct that remained after IDS. Hemostasis was successfully performed by transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in an emergency setting. Then, elective surgery for extrahepatic bile duct resection and choledochojejunostomy was performed to prevent rebleeding. Pathological examination revealed severely and chronically inflamed mucosa of the bile duct. Additionally, cholangiocarcinoma (Tis, N0, M0, pStage 0) was incidentally revealed.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
It has been indicated that not only carcinogenesis, but also a risk of life-threatening bleeding exists due to long-lasting chronic inflammation to the remnant bile duct after IDS for CBD. Additionally, both knowledge of which CBD operation was performed, and an accurate clinical history are important for the diagnosis of hemobilia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34232428
doi: 10.1186/s40792-021-01242-3
pii: 10.1186/s40792-021-01242-3
pmc: PMC8263832
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

157

Références

Br J Surg. 2001 Jun;88(6):773-86
pubmed: 11412246
Surg Clin North Am. 2014 Apr;94(2):377-94
pubmed: 24679427
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2014 Feb;4(Suppl 1):S18-26
pubmed: 25755590
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 Jan;94(1):e20-1
pubmed: 22524914
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2010 Mar 15;2(3):130-5
pubmed: 21160820
Ann Surg. 1970 Nov;172(5):844-51
pubmed: 5477660
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):1050-3
pubmed: 21659852
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2016 Dec;33(4):324-331
pubmed: 27904252
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001 Jul;33(1):61-3
pubmed: 11418794
J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;47(7):731-59
pubmed: 22722902
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2019 Aug 23;7:2050313X19872075
pubmed: 31489197
Liver Res. 2018 Dec;2(4):200-208
pubmed: 31308984
Br J Surg. 2018 Apr;105(5):482-490
pubmed: 29480528
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Oct;151(4):783-4
pubmed: 3262280
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Jun;20(5):472-80
pubmed: 23579999
Am J Surg. 1977 Aug;134(2):263-9
pubmed: 889044
Arch Surg. 2010 Feb;145(2):202-4
pubmed: 20157090
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Jan;164(1):61-4
pubmed: 3026058
Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 1998 May;95(5):450-4
pubmed: 9621703

Auteurs

Shunryo Minezaki (S)

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Takeyuki Misawa (T)

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan. take-misawa@jikei.ac.jp.

Makoto Watanabe (M)

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Hideki Takahashi (H)

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Takashi Koenuma (T)

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Rie Kondo (R)

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Hiroe Toyoda (H)

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Kentaro Nemoto (K)

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Hiroyuki Tsukayama (H)

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Makoto Shibuya (M)

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Keita Wada (K)

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Keiji Sano (K)

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Yasunori Ohta (Y)

Department of Pathology, Teikyo University Hospital, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Satoe Numakura (S)

Department of Pathology, Teikyo University Hospital, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Yuko Sasajima (Y)

Department of Pathology, Teikyo University Hospital, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Hiroshi Uozaki (H)

Department of Pathology, Teikyo University Hospital, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Classifications MeSH