No Difference in Penetrance between Truncating and Missense/Aberrant Splicing Pathogenic Variants in
Lynch syndrome
MLH1
MSH2
aberrant splicing
cancer incidence
missense
penetrance
truncating
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jun 2021
28 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
24
05
2021
revised:
15
06
2021
accepted:
16
06
2021
entrez:
2
7
2021
pubmed:
3
7
2021
medline:
3
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lynch syndrome is the most common genetic predisposition for hereditary cancer. Carriers of pathogenic changes in mismatch repair (MMR) genes have an increased risk of developing colorectal (CRC), endometrial, ovarian, urinary tract, prostate, and other cancers, depending on which gene is malfunctioning. In Lynch syndrome, differences in cancer incidence (penetrance) according to the gene involved have led to the stratification of cancer surveillance. By contrast, any differences in penetrance determined by the type of pathogenic variant remain unknown. To determine cumulative incidences of cancer in carriers of truncating and missense or aberrant splicing pathogenic variants of the Carriers of pathogenic variants of Among 5199 carriers, 1045 had missense or aberrant splicing variants, and 3930 had truncating variants. Prospective observation years for the two groups were 8205 and 34,141 years, respectively, after which there were no significant differences in incidences for cancer overall or for colorectal cancer or endometrial cancers separately. Truncating and missense or aberrant splicing pathogenic variants were associated with similar average cumulative incidences of cancer in carriers of
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Lynch syndrome is the most common genetic predisposition for hereditary cancer. Carriers of pathogenic changes in mismatch repair (MMR) genes have an increased risk of developing colorectal (CRC), endometrial, ovarian, urinary tract, prostate, and other cancers, depending on which gene is malfunctioning. In Lynch syndrome, differences in cancer incidence (penetrance) according to the gene involved have led to the stratification of cancer surveillance. By contrast, any differences in penetrance determined by the type of pathogenic variant remain unknown.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To determine cumulative incidences of cancer in carriers of truncating and missense or aberrant splicing pathogenic variants of the
METHODS
METHODS
Carriers of pathogenic variants of
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 5199 carriers, 1045 had missense or aberrant splicing variants, and 3930 had truncating variants. Prospective observation years for the two groups were 8205 and 34,141 years, respectively, after which there were no significant differences in incidences for cancer overall or for colorectal cancer or endometrial cancers separately.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Truncating and missense or aberrant splicing pathogenic variants were associated with similar average cumulative incidences of cancer in carriers of
Identifiants
pubmed: 34203177
pii: jcm10132856
doi: 10.3390/jcm10132856
pmc: PMC8269121
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA167551
Pays : United States
Références
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2019 Feb 28;17:8
pubmed: 30858900
Fam Cancer. 2016 Jul;15(3):385-93
pubmed: 26873718
Science. 1994 Mar 18;263(5153):1625-9
pubmed: 8128251
Hum Mutat. 2006 Feb;27(2):145-54
pubmed: 16395668
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):1702-1706
pubmed: 28772289
Int J Cancer. 2013 Apr 1;132(7):1556-64
pubmed: 22987364
Gut. 2017 Sep;66(9):1657-1664
pubmed: 27261338
Nat Genet. 2014 Feb;46(2):107-115
pubmed: 24362816
Gut. 2018 Jul;67(7):1306-1316
pubmed: 28754778
Genet Med. 2019 Dec;21(12):2706-2712
pubmed: 31204389
Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2013 Jan;Chapter 7:Unit7.20
pubmed: 23315928
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 21;11(1):4740
pubmed: 32958755
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3812-4
pubmed: 12824425
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 10;36(29):2961-2968
pubmed: 30161022
Genet Med. 2016 Apr;18(4):405-9
pubmed: 26110232
PLoS Genet. 2016 Jan 13;12(1):e1005756
pubmed: 26761715
Genet Med. 2020 Jan;22(1):15-25
pubmed: 31337882
Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 17;6(36):38737-48
pubmed: 26485756
Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Mar;15(3):181-94
pubmed: 25673086
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 1;33(4):319-25
pubmed: 25512458
J Med Genet. 2012 Aug;49(8):525-32
pubmed: 22889855
J Med Genet. 2015 May;52(5):348-52
pubmed: 25691505
Fam Cancer. 2021 Jan;20(1):35-39
pubmed: 32507935
Int J Cancer. 2021 Feb 15;148(4):800-811
pubmed: 32683684
Cancer Res. 1994 Sep 1;54(17):4590-4
pubmed: 8062247
Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):464-472
pubmed: 26657901
Gastroenterology. 1997 Oct;113(4):1146-58
pubmed: 9322509
Genet Med. 2019 Jul;21(7):1486-1496
pubmed: 30504929
Gut. 2002 Mar;50(3):405-12
pubmed: 11839723
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Aug;14(8):707-720
pubmed: 32755332
J Med Genet. 2018 Jan;55(1):15-20
pubmed: 28490613
Gastroenterology. 2009 Jan;136(1):131-7
pubmed: 19010329
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2017 Oct 10;15:18
pubmed: 29046738
Front Genet. 2020 Jul 27;11:798
pubmed: 32849802
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2020 Mar 14;18:6
pubmed: 32190163
Fam Cancer. 2016 Oct;15(4):579-86
pubmed: 26960970