Skin infections due to Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing S. aureus-Cost effectiveness of outpatient treatment.
Adolescent
Adult
Ambulatory Care
Bacterial Toxins
/ biosynthesis
Child
Exotoxins
/ biosynthesis
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Leukocidins
/ biosynthesis
Male
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
/ metabolism
Middle Aged
Outpatients
Retrospective Studies
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
/ economics
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
09
12
2020
accepted:
10
06
2021
entrez:
25
6
2021
pubmed:
26
6
2021
medline:
17
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) caused by Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-producing strains of Staphylococcus aureus (PVL-SA) are associated with recurrent skin abscesses. Secondary prevention, in conjunction with primary treatment of the infection, focuses on topical decolonization. Topical decolonization is a standard procedure in cases of recurrent PVL-SA skin infections and is recommended in international guidelines. However, this outpatient treatment is often not fully reimbursed by health insurance providers, which may interfere with successful PVL-SA decolonization. Our goal was to estimate the cost effectiveness of outpatient decolonization of patients with recurrent PVL-SA skin infections. We calculated the average cost of treatment for PVL-SA per outpatient decolonization procedure as well as per in-hospital stay. The study was conducted between 2014 and 2018 at a German tertiary care university hospital. The cohort analyzed was obtained from the hospital's microbiology laboratory database. Data on medical costs, DRG-based diagnoses, and ICD-10 patient data was obtained from the hospital's financial controlling department. We calculated the average cost of treatment for patients admitted for treatment of PVL-SA induced skin infections. The cost of outpatient treatment is based on the German regulations of drug prices for prescription drugs. We analyzed a total of n = 466 swabs from n = 411 patients with recurrent skin infections suspected of carrying PVL-SA. PVL-SA was detected in 61.3% of all patients included in the study. Of those isolates, 80.6% were methicillin-susceptible, 19.4% methicillin-resistant. 89.8% of all patients were treated as outpatients. In 73.0% of inpatients colonized with PVL-SA the main diagnosis was SSTI. The median length of stay was 5.5 days for inpatients colonized with PVL-SA whose main diagnosis SSTI; the average cost was €2,283. The estimated costs per decolonization procedure in outpatients ranged from €50-€110, depending on the products used. Our data shows that outpatient decolonization offers a highly cost-effective secondary prevention strategy, which may prevent costly inpatient treatments. Therefore, health insurance companies should consider providing coverage of outpatient treatment of recurrent PVL-SA skin and soft tissue infections.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34170945
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253633
pii: PONE-D-20-38786
pmc: PMC8232536
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bacterial Toxins
0
Exotoxins
0
Leukocidins
0
Panton-Valentine leukocidin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0253633Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Nov;29(5):1128-32
pubmed: 10524952
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Jan;51(1):16-25
pubmed: 29174420
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2019 Mar;17(3):345-369
pubmed: 30920735
Lancet Infect Dis. 2005 Dec;5(12):751-62
pubmed: 16310147
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;13(1):43-54
pubmed: 23103172
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jun 1;44(11):e88-95
pubmed: 17479931
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Mar;53(3):261-267
pubmed: 30412736
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15;59(2):e10-52
pubmed: 24973422
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011 Dec;38(6):457-64
pubmed: 21733661
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):621
pubmed: 32831057
GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip. 2010 Feb 10;5(1):Doc01
pubmed: 20204100
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Jan;50(1):86-90
pubmed: 22090402
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jul;53(7):2122-31
pubmed: 25903575
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016 Apr;29(2):201-22
pubmed: 26817630
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Apr 26;16:184
pubmed: 27112442
J Med Microbiol. 2011 Mar;60(Pt 3):317-322
pubmed: 21071544
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 21;15(4):e0231772
pubmed: 32315364
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Apr;67(4):837-40
pubmed: 22240400
N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 3;352(5):468-75
pubmed: 15689585
West J Med. 2000 Apr;172(4):235-9
pubmed: 10778372
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Nov;100(3):359-360
pubmed: 29577992