Pitfalls in comparison of coronary artery measurements of Indian population with different geographical area studies.
Ethnic differences
Gender differences
Morphological significance
Multi-centre study
Normal coronary artery measurements
Journal
Indian heart journal
ISSN: 2213-3763
Titre abrégé: Indian Heart J
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0374675
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
30
09
2020
revised:
23
03
2021
accepted:
08
04
2021
entrez:
22
6
2021
pubmed:
23
6
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of morbidity and mortality especially in the developing countries. Coronary artery measurements (CAM) are the most important factor affecting the procedure and outcome of coronary angioplasty (PCI) as well as coronary by-pass operations (CABG). In this study, we aimed to establish a database for the normal CAM as well as for gender difference among the Indian population using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) with an objective of assessing normal coronary vessel morphology of patients with normal coronaries. Four thousand angiograms from patients of Indian origin were studied prospectively after procuring the sanction for the same from the ethical committee of the pre-selected hospitals of four states in India. Informed consents were obtained. Post CABG, post PCI patients and patient being diabetic for ≥5 years were also excluded from the study. Ten segments from right and left coronary arteries were taken for diameter measurements. These coronary diameters were indexed to body surface area (BSA) (mean diameter mm/m The dimensions of the coronary artery segments of Indians were smaller (in BSA indexed and non-indexed data), compared to studies from other continents which can be due to their smaller BSA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34154754
pii: S0019-4832(21)00093-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.04.001
pmc: PMC8322926
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
347-352Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Références
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Apr;29(4):492-5
pubmed: 16473514
Circulation. 1992 Jul;86(1):232-46
pubmed: 1535570
Cardiology. 1998;89(2):103-10
pubmed: 9524010
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2013 Jul;9(4):312-31
pubmed: 23590534
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2014 Dec;11(4):329-37
pubmed: 25593582
Circulation. 1991 Dec;84(6):2294-306
pubmed: 1959185
J Interv Cardiol. 2006 Aug;19(4):340-4
pubmed: 16881982
Lancet. 2011 Feb 19;377(9766):680-9
pubmed: 21269677
Indian Heart J. 2017 Jul - Aug;69(4):512-514
pubmed: 28822520
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992 Feb;25(2):110-31
pubmed: 1544153
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;1(1):31-7
pubmed: 22254183
Prev Med. 2017 Mar;96:79-84
pubmed: 28007496
Neth Heart J. 2009 Apr;17(4):155-61
pubmed: 19421361
Circulation. 2006 Jun 27;113(25):e924-9
pubmed: 16801466
Int J Cardiol. 1997 Nov 20;62(2):133-41
pubmed: 9431864
N Engl J Med. 1987 Oct 22;317(17):1098
pubmed: 3657876
Int J Cardiol. 1995 May;49(3):267-9
pubmed: 7649673
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):TC10-3
pubmed: 27437324
Postgrad Med J. 1999 Aug;75(886):463-6
pubmed: 10646023
J Pak Med Assoc. 2004 May;54(5):258-61
pubmed: 15270185
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2015 Oct;23(8):907-12
pubmed: 26124434