The Emergence of Value-Based Leadership Behavior at the Frontline of Management: A Role Theory Perspective and Future Research Agenda.
authentic leadership
ethical leadership
frontline manager
role theory
servant leadership
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
29
11
2020
accepted:
06
04
2021
entrez:
11
6
2021
pubmed:
12
6
2021
medline:
12
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The importance of value-based leadership such as authentic, ethical, and servant leadership is inconspicuous. However, the benefits of these leadership approaches are often only explained through the behaviors of their followers. As such, limited research has communicated the leader's motivation for pursuing such leadership behavior, resulting in such discourse to escape theorizing. We draw upon role theory and paid attention to the role of higher-level management (leadership) through the trickle-down model to underline their importance in the organization. We then expand this role theory framework by synthesizing research to explain the emergence of value-based leadership behavior at the frontline of management. In doing so, we aim to provide a stronger explanation of the emergence of value-based leadership in organizations. We conclude this analysis by guiding future research in the form of propositions to investigate the psychological process and organizational factors to empirically examine the proposed role framework.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34113282
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635106
pmc: PMC8185066
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
635106Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Chang, Budhwar and Crawshaw.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Jan;99(1):113-24
pubmed: 23937297
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Mar;105(3):245-273
pubmed: 31343203
Harv Bus Rev. 1998 May-Jun;76(3):98-105
pubmed: 10179657
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jul;96(4):851-62
pubmed: 21319877
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Mar;76(3):482-97
pubmed: 10101878
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Jun;106(6):882-901
pubmed: 32700918
J Appl Psychol. 2015 May;100(3):948-65
pubmed: 25420055
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Jan;80(1):152-65
pubmed: 11195887
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:635-60
pubmed: 23834354
J Appl Psychol. 2011 May;96(3):633-42
pubmed: 21142344
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jan;100(1):98-113
pubmed: 24773402
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Dec;103(12):1335-1357
pubmed: 30058813
J Appl Psychol. 2015 May;100(3):681-94
pubmed: 25402956
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Mar;100(2):511-21
pubmed: 25314366
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jan;104(1):123-145
pubmed: 30221953
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Sep;101(9):1342-51
pubmed: 27599091
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Dec;83(6):1423-40
pubmed: 12500822
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):263-75
pubmed: 19186911
Br J Soc Psychol. 1993 Mar;32 ( Pt 1):87-106
pubmed: 8467372
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Aug;101(2):366-85
pubmed: 21244182
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Jul;99(4):635-50
pubmed: 24446913
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Dec;105(12):1447-1465
pubmed: 32162952
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jan;90(1):77-93
pubmed: 15641891
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Oct;117(4):758-772
pubmed: 30614728
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Mar;102(3):434-451
pubmed: 28125257
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jul;95(4):769-80
pubmed: 20604596
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Aug;101(8):1082-96
pubmed: 27100068
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Jun;101(6):815-30
pubmed: 26867103
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Sep;100(5):1381-97
pubmed: 25706447
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Nov;90(6):1069-83
pubmed: 16316266
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Sep;100(5):1641-52
pubmed: 25844927