Use of US Blood Donors for National Serosurveillance of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Antibodies: Basis for an Expanded National Donor Serosurveillance Program.
COVID-19
COVID-19 srological testing
SARS-CoV-2
seroprevalence
Journal
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 03 2022
09 03 2022
Historique:
received:
24
04
2021
pubmed:
11
6
2021
medline:
15
3
2022
entrez:
10
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-IV-Pediatric (REDS-IV-P) Epidemiology, Surveillance and Preparedness of the Novel SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic (RESPONSE) seroprevalence study conducted monthly cross-sectional testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies in blood donors in 6 US metropolitan regions to estimate the extent of SARS-CoV-2 infections over time. During March-August 2020, approximately ≥1000 serum specimens were collected monthly from each region and tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using a well-validated algorithm. Regional seroprevalence estimates were weighted based on demographic differences compared with the general population. Seroprevalence was compared with reported coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case rates over time. For all regions, seroprevalence was <1.0% in March 2020. New York, New York, experienced the biggest increase (peak seroprevalence, 15.8% in May). All other regions experienced modest increases in seroprevalence (1%-2% in May-June to 2%-4% in July-August). Seroprevalence was higher in younger, non-Hispanic black, and Hispanic donors. Temporal increases in donor seroprevalence correlated with reported case rates in each region. In August, 1.3-5.6 estimated cumulative infections (based on seroprevalence data) per COVID-19 case were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Increases in seroprevalence were found in all regions, with the largest increase in New York. Seroprevalence was higher in non-Hispanic black and Hispanic than in non-Hispanic white blood donors. SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing of blood donor samples can be used to estimate the seroprevalence in the general population by region and demographic group. The methods derived from the RESPONSE seroprevalence study served as the basis for expanding SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence surveillance to all 50 states and Puerto Rico.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-IV-Pediatric (REDS-IV-P) Epidemiology, Surveillance and Preparedness of the Novel SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic (RESPONSE) seroprevalence study conducted monthly cross-sectional testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies in blood donors in 6 US metropolitan regions to estimate the extent of SARS-CoV-2 infections over time.
METHODS
During March-August 2020, approximately ≥1000 serum specimens were collected monthly from each region and tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using a well-validated algorithm. Regional seroprevalence estimates were weighted based on demographic differences compared with the general population. Seroprevalence was compared with reported coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case rates over time.
RESULTS
For all regions, seroprevalence was <1.0% in March 2020. New York, New York, experienced the biggest increase (peak seroprevalence, 15.8% in May). All other regions experienced modest increases in seroprevalence (1%-2% in May-June to 2%-4% in July-August). Seroprevalence was higher in younger, non-Hispanic black, and Hispanic donors. Temporal increases in donor seroprevalence correlated with reported case rates in each region. In August, 1.3-5.6 estimated cumulative infections (based on seroprevalence data) per COVID-19 case were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
CONCLUSIONS
Increases in seroprevalence were found in all regions, with the largest increase in New York. Seroprevalence was higher in non-Hispanic black and Hispanic than in non-Hispanic white blood donors. SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing of blood donor samples can be used to estimate the seroprevalence in the general population by region and demographic group. The methods derived from the RESPONSE seroprevalence study served as the basis for expanding SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence surveillance to all 50 states and Puerto Rico.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34111244
pii: 6296028
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab537
pmc: PMC8406874
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
871-881Subventions
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : 75N95019D00033
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI119056
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : 75N92019D00032
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01AI119056
Pays : United States
Investigateurs
C Cassetti
(C)
S Gerber
(S)
M Patton
(M)
F Havers
(F)
S Basavaraju
(S)
A E Williams
(AE)
S Anderson
(S)
J Haynes
(J)
L McCain
(L)
A Hui
(A)
C Samuels
(C)
H Tanner
(H)
Z Kaidarova
(Z)
M P B
(MP)
P J Norris
(PJ)
M S
(M)
S M Mathew
(SM)
S Stramer
(S)
D Kessler
(D)
B A Konkle
(BA)
B Custer
(B)
P M Ness
(PM)
S H Kleinman
(SH)
C D Josephson
(CD)
S A Glynn
(SA)
K Malkin
(K)
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Mar;174(3):362-373
pubmed: 33253040
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;20(12):1446-1456
pubmed: 32673593
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1200-1204
pubmed: 32555424
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 Feb 11;155(3):343-353
pubmed: 33155015
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 27;72(2):249-253
pubmed: 33501969
Transfusion. 2021 Sep;61(9):2677-2687
pubmed: 34121205
JAMA. 2020 Oct 27;324(16):1677-1679
pubmed: 32926078
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2485-2486
pubmed: 32495088
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 11;69(36):1250-1257
pubmed: 32915166
Lancet. 2020 Oct 24;396(10259):1335-1344
pubmed: 32987007
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2249-2251
pubmed: 32374370
Sci Adv. 2021 Jul 30;7(31):
pubmed: 34330709
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 21;:
pubmed: 32692365
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 30;69(43):1584-1590
pubmed: 33119562
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):778-785
pubmed: 32198501
Anesth Analg. 2020 Sep;131(3):669-676
pubmed: 32520728
Science. 2021 Jan 15;371(6526):288-292
pubmed: 33293339
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9
pubmed: 18313558
Transfusion. 2014 Dec;54(12):3232-41
pubmed: 24965017
J Infect Dis. 2005 Jun 15;191(12):2033-7
pubmed: 15897988
Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Jul;22(7):1221-8
pubmed: 27070192
Transfusion. 2017 Mar;57(3pt2):770-778
pubmed: 28229475
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3066-e3073
pubmed: 33147319
JAMA. 2021 Mar 2;325(9):821-822
pubmed: 33507218
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):970-971
pubmed: 32003551
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1778-1788
pubmed: 29742375
J Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 1;214(1):49-54
pubmed: 27302934