Intraoperative B-Mode Ultrasound Guided Surgery and the Extent of Glioblastoma Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

extent of resection glioblastoma image guided neurosurgery intraoperative ultrasound randomized controlled trial

Journal

Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 05 01 2021
accepted: 09 04 2021
entrez: 7 6 2021
pubmed: 8 6 2021
medline: 8 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Intraoperative MRI and 5-aminolaevulinic acid guided surgery are useful to maximize the extent of glioblastoma resection. Intraoperative ultrasound is used as a time-and cost-effective alternative, but its value has never been assessed in a trial. The goal of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the value of intraoperative B-mode ultrasound guided surgery on the extent of glioblastoma resection. In this randomized controlled trial, patients of 18 years or older with a newly diagnosed presumed glioblastoma, deemed totally resectable, presenting at the Erasmus MC (Rotterdam, The Netherlands) were enrolled and randomized (1:1) into intraoperative B-mode ultrasound guided surgery or resection under standard neuronavigation. The primary outcome of this study was complete contrast-enhancing tumor resection, assessed quantitatively by a blinded neuroradiologist on pre- and post-operative MRI scans. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03531333). We enrolled 50 patients between November 1, 2016 and October 30, 2019. Analysis was done in 23 of 25 (92%) patients in the intraoperative B-mode ultrasound group and 24 of 25 (96%) patients in the standard surgery group. Eight (35%) of 23 patients in the intraoperative B-mode ultrasound group and two (8%) of 24 patients in the standard surgery group underwent complete resection (p=0.036). Baseline characteristics, neurological outcome, functional performance, quality of life, complication rates, overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ between treatment groups (p>0.05). Intraoperative B-mode ultrasound enables complete resection more often than standard surgery without harming patients and can be considered to maximize the extent of glioblastoma resection during surgery.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Intraoperative MRI and 5-aminolaevulinic acid guided surgery are useful to maximize the extent of glioblastoma resection. Intraoperative ultrasound is used as a time-and cost-effective alternative, but its value has never been assessed in a trial. The goal of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the value of intraoperative B-mode ultrasound guided surgery on the extent of glioblastoma resection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
In this randomized controlled trial, patients of 18 years or older with a newly diagnosed presumed glioblastoma, deemed totally resectable, presenting at the Erasmus MC (Rotterdam, The Netherlands) were enrolled and randomized (1:1) into intraoperative B-mode ultrasound guided surgery or resection under standard neuronavigation. The primary outcome of this study was complete contrast-enhancing tumor resection, assessed quantitatively by a blinded neuroradiologist on pre- and post-operative MRI scans. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03531333).
RESULTS RESULTS
We enrolled 50 patients between November 1, 2016 and October 30, 2019. Analysis was done in 23 of 25 (92%) patients in the intraoperative B-mode ultrasound group and 24 of 25 (96%) patients in the standard surgery group. Eight (35%) of 23 patients in the intraoperative B-mode ultrasound group and two (8%) of 24 patients in the standard surgery group underwent complete resection (p=0.036). Baseline characteristics, neurological outcome, functional performance, quality of life, complication rates, overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ between treatment groups (p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Intraoperative B-mode ultrasound enables complete resection more often than standard surgery without harming patients and can be considered to maximize the extent of glioblastoma resection during surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34094939
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.649797
pmc: PMC8170308
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03531333']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

649797

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Incekara, Smits, Dirven, Bos, Balvers, Haitsma, Schouten and Vincent.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

MS reports an honorarium received from Parexel Ltd (paid to institution) and speaker fees from GE Healthcare (paid to institution). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010 Nov;152(11):1873-86
pubmed: 20652608
World Neurosurg. 2016 Aug;92:255-263
pubmed: 27178235
Neurosurgery. 2009 Jun;64(6):1073-81; discussion 1081
pubmed: 19487886
Front Oncol. 2018 Dec 03;8:576
pubmed: 30560090
Neurosurgery. 2010 Nov;67(5):1329-34
pubmed: 20871451
Lancet Oncol. 2005 Dec;6(12):937-44
pubmed: 16321761
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Mar;40(3):E7
pubmed: 26926065
Neurosurgery. 2002 Apr;50(4):804-12; discussion 812
pubmed: 11904032
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019 Aug 1;17(2):227-236
pubmed: 30496587
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1:CD012788
pubmed: 29355914
Radiology. 2017 Oct;285(1):242-249
pubmed: 28562204
Lancet Oncol. 2006 May;7(5):392-401
pubmed: 16648043
Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):139-50
pubmed: 8901377
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
Lancet Oncol. 2009 May;10(5):459-66
pubmed: 19269895
J Neurosurg. 2001 Aug;95(2):190-8
pubmed: 11780887
Neuro Oncol. 2014 Jan;16(1):113-22
pubmed: 24285550
J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):977-88
pubmed: 26495941
J Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;121(5):1115-23
pubmed: 25192475
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Oct;12(11):997-1003
pubmed: 21868284
J Neurooncol. 2017 Oct;135(1):129-139
pubmed: 28689368
Neurosurg Rev. 2016 Oct;39(4):545-55
pubmed: 26815631
Front Oncol. 2020 Jul 10;10:1087
pubmed: 32766140
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1963-72
pubmed: 20231676
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Oct;12(11):1062-70
pubmed: 21868286
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 Apr 1;18(4):363-373
pubmed: 31435672
Neurosurgery. 1998 May;42(5):1044-55; discussion 1055-6
pubmed: 9588549
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;90:440-447
pubmed: 27001238
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):190-197
pubmed: 29617848
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Apr;46(6):1033-40
pubmed: 20181476
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;6(4):495-503
pubmed: 32027343
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Nov 1;2(11):1460-1469
pubmed: 27310651

Auteurs

Fatih Incekara (F)

Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Marion Smits (M)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Linda Dirven (L)

Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands.

Eelke M Bos (EM)

Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Rutger K Balvers (RK)

Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Iain K Haitsma (IK)

Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Joost W Schouten (JW)

Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Arnaud J P E Vincent (AJPE)

Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH