A survey examining the use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation on adult intensive care units across the UK.

Cough assist cough augmentation mechanical ventilation physiotherapy weaning

Journal

Journal of the Intensive Care Society
ISSN: 1751-1437
Titre abrégé: J Intensive Care Soc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101538668

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
entrez: 7 6 2021
pubmed: 8 6 2021
medline: 8 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite potential benefits, it is not known how widely physiotherapists use mechanical insufflation-exsufflation devices on UK adult intensive care units. This survey aimed to describe mechanical insufflation-exsufflation use in UK adult intensive care units. Cross-sectional electronic survey of physiotherapists working in a permanent post on adult intensive care units. One hundred and sixty-six complete surveys were available for analysis, reflecting a diverse geographical spread. Nearly all (98%; 163/166) clinicians had access to mechanical insufflation-exsufflation. The estimated frequency of use varied, with the majority reporting weekly or monthly use (52/163, 32%; 50/163, 31%, respectively). Nearly all clinicians (99%) used mechanical insufflation-exsufflation with extubated patients. In contrast, around half of respondents (86/163, 53%) used mechanical insufflation-exsufflation with intubated patients, with a range of perceived barriers reported. Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation devices are widely available on UK adult intensive care units, with use more common in extubated patients. Barriers to mechanical insufflation-exsufflation use in the intubated population warrant further investigation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34093728
doi: 10.1177/1751143719870121
pii: 10.1177_1751143719870121
pmc: PMC8142094
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

283-289

Informations de copyright

© The Intensive Care Society 2019.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Dent Clin North Am. 2019 Jan;63(1):129-144
pubmed: 30447788
Eur Respir J. 2007 May;29(5):1033-56
pubmed: 17470624
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jan;77:91-105
pubmed: 29073462
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003 Feb;9(1):59-66
pubmed: 12548031
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Sep;43(9):1270-1281
pubmed: 28289812
Respir Care. 2015 Apr;60(4):477-83
pubmed: 25492956
Respir Care. 2016 Oct;61(10):1360-8
pubmed: 27624630
Chest. 2001 Oct;120(4):1262-70
pubmed: 11591570
Respir Care. 2018 Dec;63(12):1471-1477
pubmed: 30018175
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jun;45(6):865-868
pubmed: 30519901
Crit Care. 2012 Dec 12;16(2):R48
pubmed: 22420538
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Jul;30(7):1334-9
pubmed: 14999444
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Respir Care. 2017 Dec;62(12):1505-1519
pubmed: 28900041
Crit Care Nurse. 2015 Oct;35(5):28-42
pubmed: 26427973
Respir Med. 2018 Mar;136:98-110
pubmed: 29501255
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2018 Apr 3;6(1):8
pubmed: 29616357
Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2612-8
pubmed: 21765357
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Nov;43(6):719-27
pubmed: 26603796

Auteurs

Ema Swingwood (E)

University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.

Lyvonne Tume (L)

School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK.

Fiona Cramp (F)

Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.

Classifications MeSH