Comparison of endotracheal intubation, laryngeal mask airway, and I-gel in children undergoing strabismus surgery.
Endotracheal intubation
I-gel
hemodynamic changes
intraocular pressure
laryngeal mask airway
postoperative nausea and vomiting
Journal
Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
ISSN: 1735-1995
Titre abrégé: J Res Med Sci
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101235599
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
28
05
2019
revised:
03
11
2019
accepted:
27
08
2020
entrez:
4
6
2021
pubmed:
5
6
2021
medline:
5
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Insertion of the advanced airway during induction of general anesthesia can cause undesirable sympathetic stimulation such as increased intraocular pressure (IOP) and hemodynamic parameters. In this study, we compared insertion of three different advanced airway devices; endotracheal tube (ETT), laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and I-gel in terms of IOP, hemodynamic changes and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following induction of general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in children undergoing strabismus surgery. A total of 90 children (5.68 ± 1.49 years old) were randomly assigned to one of the three groups, ETT, LMA, or I-gel insertion as advanced airway devices IOP and also hemodynamic variables were measured before (T0 and T1) and immediately after (T2) the insertion of these airway devices, although 2 min (T3) and 5 min (T4) after it. PONV was assessed about 2 h after the completion of surgery in the recovery room. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), IOP, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly different between the three groups immediately (T2), 2 min (T3), and 5 min (T4) after the insertion of airway devices. The heart rate (HR) was significantly different between the three groups in all measurement times except of T0. Within-group comparisons showed that the three groups had significant changes in MAP, IOP, HR, systolic and diastolic pressure before and after airway insertion (T1 and T2). The trend in the LMA and ETT groups was descending-ascending-descending, whereas in the I-gel group, it was quite descending. There was no significant difference among the three groups in terms of PONV. As a result, our study showed that, compared with LMA and ETT, the I-gel had less impact on undesirable stress responses and seems to be superior to LMA and ETT in children undergoing strabismus surgery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Insertion of the advanced airway during induction of general anesthesia can cause undesirable sympathetic stimulation such as increased intraocular pressure (IOP) and hemodynamic parameters. In this study, we compared insertion of three different advanced airway devices; endotracheal tube (ETT), laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and I-gel in terms of IOP, hemodynamic changes and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following induction of general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in children undergoing strabismus surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
A total of 90 children (5.68 ± 1.49 years old) were randomly assigned to one of the three groups, ETT, LMA, or I-gel insertion as advanced airway devices IOP and also hemodynamic variables were measured before (T0 and T1) and immediately after (T2) the insertion of these airway devices, although 2 min (T3) and 5 min (T4) after it. PONV was assessed about 2 h after the completion of surgery in the recovery room.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean arterial pressure (MAP), IOP, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly different between the three groups immediately (T2), 2 min (T3), and 5 min (T4) after the insertion of airway devices. The heart rate (HR) was significantly different between the three groups in all measurement times except of T0. Within-group comparisons showed that the three groups had significant changes in MAP, IOP, HR, systolic and diastolic pressure before and after airway insertion (T1 and T2). The trend in the LMA and ETT groups was descending-ascending-descending, whereas in the I-gel group, it was quite descending. There was no significant difference among the three groups in terms of PONV.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
As a result, our study showed that, compared with LMA and ETT, the I-gel had less impact on undesirable stress responses and seems to be superior to LMA and ETT in children undergoing strabismus surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34084188
doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_325_19
pii: JRMS-26-9
pmc: PMC8103961
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
9Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Research in Medical Sciences.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Can J Anaesth. 2010 Jun;57(6):602-17
pubmed: 20393822
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004 Jun;18(3):275-80
pubmed: 15232805
Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66 Suppl 2:45-56
pubmed: 22074079
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014 Oct-Dec;4(4):288-92
pubmed: 25625059
Anaesthesia. 2014 Nov;69(11):1189-92
pubmed: 25209400
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jul;27(7):598-601
pubmed: 19915475
Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):195-8
pubmed: 25829910
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Oct;23(3):315-20
pubmed: 26860022
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 27;370(9):883
pubmed: 24571772
Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):521-525
pubmed: 27746545
J Glaucoma. 2015 Jun-Jul;24(5):372-6
pubmed: 23835673
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;112(4):742-8
pubmed: 24322570
J Res Med Sci. 2012 Jun;17(6):503-7
pubmed: 23626623
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2017 Oct;45(5):270-276
pubmed: 29114411
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Dec;19(4):581-93
pubmed: 16408535
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;28(6):443-8
pubmed: 21455075
Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Sep;26(9):936-41
pubmed: 27377361
Surv Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep - Oct;62(5):648-658
pubmed: 28438591
Saudi J Anaesth. 2010 Sep;4(3):131-6
pubmed: 21189847
Saudi J Anaesth. 2012 Jul;6(3):224-8
pubmed: 23162394