An audit to assess the impact of prescribing a monofilament fibre debridement pad for patients with unhealed wounds after six months.


Journal

Journal of wound care
ISSN: 0969-0700
Titre abrégé: J Wound Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9417080

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 May 2021
Historique:
entrez: 12 5 2021
pubmed: 13 5 2021
medline: 2 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A monofilament fibre debridement pad has been found to be a rapid and effective mechanical method of removing dry skin, biofilm and debris from acute and chronic wounds with minimal patient discomfort. Evidence of its impact on prescribing and wound healing, however, has been more limited. The aim of this audit was to show evidence of the monofilament fibre debridement pad's impact on wound treatment costs through an analysis of NHS wound-care prescribing data in England. A dataset for 486 uniquely identified patients who had been newly prescribed the monofilament fibre debridement pad was obtained from the NHS Business Services Authority. All data were anonymised. Costs were identified for the six months before and six months after the month of first prescription of the monofilament fibre debridement pad. The total cost of wound-care prescribing fell by 14% or £101,723 in the six months after the intervention compared with the six months before. The average monthly expenditure per patient fell from £244 before the intervention to £209 (n=486) after. These results indicate that use of the monofilament fibre debridement pad could reduce prescribing costs and the use of antimicrobial and negative pressure therapies. Further research is warranted to investigate the clinical role of the monofilament fibre debridement pad in wound healing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33979215
doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.5.381
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

381-388

Auteurs

Joanna Burnett (J)

GPrX Data, Cambridge, UK.

Andrew Kerr (A)

Lower Limb Consultancy Services Ltd, UK.
Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.

Margaret Morrison (M)

Lohmann & Rauscher, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, UK.

Abbe Ruston (A)

Lohmann & Rauscher, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH