Differences in NT-proBNP Response and Prognosis in Men and Women With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
/ therapeutic use
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
/ therapeutic use
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Biomarkers
/ blood
Canada
/ epidemiology
Cause of Death
/ trends
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Guideline Adherence
Heart Failure
/ blood
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
/ blood
Peptide Fragments
/ blood
Prognosis
Protein Precursors
Retrospective Studies
Sex Distribution
Sex Factors
Stroke Volume
/ physiology
United States
/ epidemiology
N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide
heart failure
women
Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Titre abrégé: J Am Heart Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 05 2021
18 05 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
7
5
2021
medline:
28
10
2021
entrez:
6
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) is a prognostic biomarker in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. However, it is unclear whether there is a sex difference in NT-proBNP response and whether the therapeutic goal of NT-proBNP ≤1000 pg/mL has equivalent prognostic value in men and women with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Methods and Results In a secondary analysis of the GUIDE-IT (Guiding Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment) trial we analyzed trends in NT-proBNP and goal attainment by sex. Differences in clinical characteristics, HF treatment, and time to all-cause death or HF hospitalization were compared. Landmark analysis at 3 months determined the prognostic value of early NT-proBNP goal achievement in men and women. Of the 286 (32%) women and 608 (68%) men in the GUIDE-IT trial, women were more likely to have a nonischemic cause and shorter duration of HF. Guideline-directed medical therapy was less intense over time in women. The absolute NT-proBNP values were consistently lower in women; however, the change in NT-proBNP and clinical outcomes were similar. After adjustment, women achieving the NT-proBNP goal had an 82% reduction in death or HF hospitalization compared with a 59% reduction in men. Conclusions Men and women with HF with reduced ejection fraction had a similar NT-proBNP response despite less intensive HF treatment among women. However, compared with men, the early NT-proBNP goal of ≤1000 pg/mL had greater prognostic value in women. Future efforts should be aimed at intensifying guideline-directed medical therapy in women, which may result in greater NT-proBNP reductions and improved outcomes in women with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01685840.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33955231
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019712
pmc: PMC8200692
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
0
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
0
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
0
Biomarkers
0
Peptide Fragments
0
Protein Precursors
0
pro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)
0
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
114471-18-0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01685840']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e019712Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Sep 3;74(9):1205-1217
pubmed: 31466618
CMAJ. 2018 Jul 16;190(28):E848-E854
pubmed: 30012800
Circulation. 2001 Jan 23;103(3):375-80
pubmed: 11157688
Circ J. 2017 Aug 25;81(9):1329-1336
pubmed: 28442636
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2011 Mar;8(1):15-23
pubmed: 22783280
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;5(7):757-764
pubmed: 32319999
Circ J. 2018 Jul 25;82(8):2096-2102
pubmed: 29925742
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;7(6):505-515
pubmed: 31146874
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Apr;13(4):e006134
pubmed: 32268795
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Feb;41(2):211-216
pubmed: 29485677
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 2;64(9):887-94
pubmed: 25169173
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Apr;2(2):180-6
pubmed: 24720927
Eur J Heart Fail. 1999 Dec;1(4):407-10
pubmed: 10937955
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Apr;37(4):560-571
pubmed: 33383166
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Apr;2(2):148-58
pubmed: 24720923
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Oct;5(10):735-742
pubmed: 28958348
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jan 8;73(1):29-40
pubmed: 30621948
Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4 Suppl):S16-23
pubmed: 19782784
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Dec 17;42(12):2128-34
pubmed: 14680739
Heart. 2003 Jul;89(7):745-51
pubmed: 12807847
Heart Fail Rev. 2016 Nov;21(6):675-697
pubmed: 27465132
Circulation. 2018 Feb 20;137(8):771-780
pubmed: 29459462
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004
pubmed: 25176015
Circulation. 2020 Feb 4;141(5):338-351
pubmed: 31736337
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):351-366
pubmed: 30025570
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Apr;104(4):334-41
pubmed: 25373384
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Oct;2(5):457-65
pubmed: 25194287
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 18;10(10):e019712
pubmed: 33955231
JAMA. 2017 Aug 22;318(8):713-720
pubmed: 28829876
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Sep 21;20(11):88
pubmed: 30242521