Associations between perceived discrimination and contraceptive method use: why we need better measures of discrimination in reproductive healthcare.


Journal

Women & health
ISSN: 1541-0331
Titre abrégé: Women Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7608076

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed: 4 5 2021
medline: 3 2 2022
entrez: 3 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Discrimination has historically contributed to coercive contraceptive in the United States. We investigated associations between perceived discrimination, or the perception of unequal treatment in everyday life, and contraceptive method use among U.S. women. We analyzed population-based data from a 2013 study of U.S. women who were premenopausal, age 18-50, sexually active with a male partner in the last year and were not attempting pregnancy. Perceived discrimination was measured using the Everyday Discrimination Scale. Contraceptive method use was categorized into five method categories: permanent, highly effective reversible, moderately effective, barrier and no method. We analyzed relationships between perceived discrimination and contraceptive method use with several regression models, controlling for covariates. Among 539 women in our analytic sample, those with high perceived discrimination had lower incomes, less educational attainment and were less likely to be insured. Perceived discrimination was associated with a reduced odds of using any contraceptive method (aOR 0.43, CI 0.21-0.87,

Identifiants

pubmed: 33938402
doi: 10.1080/03630242.2021.1919816
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contraceptive Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

461-469

Subventions

Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : K01 HD080722
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : K12 HD001438
Pays : United States

Auteurs

Charisse Loder (C)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

K Hall (K)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Yasamin Kusunoki (Y)

Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Lisa Hope Harris (LH)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Vanessa Dalton (V)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH