Pre-operative Joint Inflammation has no Bearing on Outcome of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 1-Year Follow-Up; a Prospective Study.
ACL reconstruction
Acute injury
IL-6
Inflammation
Journal
Indian journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0019-5413
Titre abrégé: Indian J Orthop
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0137736
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
01
05
2020
accepted:
22
05
2020
entrez:
30
4
2021
pubmed:
1
5
2021
medline:
1
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To study the effect of pre-operative joint inflammation on clinical outcome at 1 year follow-up following ACL reconstruction surgery. Male patients, aged 18-40 years, suffering from isolated ACL injury were included. All patients were randomly divided into two groups based on the type of graft used: Group A: semitendinosus gracilis graft with preserved insertions (STG-PI), Group B: bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (BPTB). Patients were categorised based on the time of presentation after injury: (a) within 6 weeks of injury, (b) between 6 and 12 weeks of injury, (c) after 12 weeks of injury. Synovial fluid levels of Interlukin-1, Interlukin-6 and TNF-α were measured in all the ACL deficient knees by taking a joint fluid sample intra-operatively. The total number of patients in the study was 59; 23 in group A (STG-PI) and 36 in group B (BPTB). Mean age of patients was 26 ± 5.146 years. 14 out of 59 (23.7%) patients presented within 6 weeks of injury, 16 (27.11%) patients presented between 6 and 12 weeks after injury and 29 (49.1%) patients presented after 12 weeks of injury. IL-6 levels were significantly high in group with < 6 weeks of injury than in group with > 12 weeks since injury. IL-6 had significant correlation with VAS scores, KT 1000, Lysholm knee scores and Tegner level of activity. There was no difference in outcome (pain scores, mechanical stability, Lysholm knee score and Tegner level of activity) at 1 year follow-up when patients with different time intervals since injury were compared. The clinical outcome in terms of pain score, mechanical stability, functional scores and return to sporting activity is comparable, irrespective of the time since injury, at short term follow-up.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To study the effect of pre-operative joint inflammation on clinical outcome at 1 year follow-up following ACL reconstruction surgery.
METHODS
METHODS
Male patients, aged 18-40 years, suffering from isolated ACL injury were included. All patients were randomly divided into two groups based on the type of graft used: Group A: semitendinosus gracilis graft with preserved insertions (STG-PI), Group B: bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (BPTB). Patients were categorised based on the time of presentation after injury: (a) within 6 weeks of injury, (b) between 6 and 12 weeks of injury, (c) after 12 weeks of injury. Synovial fluid levels of Interlukin-1, Interlukin-6 and TNF-α were measured in all the ACL deficient knees by taking a joint fluid sample intra-operatively.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The total number of patients in the study was 59; 23 in group A (STG-PI) and 36 in group B (BPTB). Mean age of patients was 26 ± 5.146 years. 14 out of 59 (23.7%) patients presented within 6 weeks of injury, 16 (27.11%) patients presented between 6 and 12 weeks after injury and 29 (49.1%) patients presented after 12 weeks of injury. IL-6 levels were significantly high in group with < 6 weeks of injury than in group with > 12 weeks since injury. IL-6 had significant correlation with VAS scores, KT 1000, Lysholm knee scores and Tegner level of activity. There was no difference in outcome (pain scores, mechanical stability, Lysholm knee score and Tegner level of activity) at 1 year follow-up when patients with different time intervals since injury were compared.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The clinical outcome in terms of pain score, mechanical stability, functional scores and return to sporting activity is comparable, irrespective of the time since injury, at short term follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33927814
doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00150-2
pii: 150
pmc: PMC8046866
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
360-367Informations de copyright
© Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestThere are no financial or other relationships that might lead to a conflict of interest.
Références
Inflammation. 2017 Dec;40(6):1815-1824
pubmed: 28707248
Am J Sports Med. 1991 Mar-Apr;19(2):156-62
pubmed: 2039067
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2476-83
pubmed: 21515806
Am J Sports Med. 1991 Jul-Aug;19(4):332-6
pubmed: 1897645
Indian J Orthop. 2016 Sep;50(5):492-498
pubmed: 27746491
J Exp Orthop. 2016 Dec;3(1):30
pubmed: 27807812
J Orthop Res. 2013 Feb;31(2):315-21
pubmed: 22886741
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Oct;26(10):2875-2882
pubmed: 29188336
Am J Sports Med. 1997 Nov-Dec;25(6):751-4
pubmed: 9397261
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;2(1):38-44
pubmed: 7584175
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Dec;(393):71-7
pubmed: 11764373
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Sep;69(7):1007-12
pubmed: 3654691
Arthroscopy. 2010 Oct;26(10):1296-301
pubmed: 20887928
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 May;141(5):743-750
pubmed: 32356171
Am J Sports Med. 1993 May-Jun;21(3):338-42
pubmed: 8346744
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jul;28(7):2036-2043
pubmed: 31559463
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Sep;33(9):1327-36
pubmed: 16002490
Am J Sports Med. 1982 May-Jun;10(3):150-4
pubmed: 6896798
J Nippon Med Sch. 2000 Jun;67(3):172-6
pubmed: 10851350
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Jun;45(7):596-606
pubmed: 21398310
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Mar;18(3):304-11
pubmed: 19838672
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 Sep;(198):43-9
pubmed: 4028566
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Jan;(358):188-93
pubmed: 9973991
Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Mar 21;5(2):e269-74
pubmed: 27354946