Insights about the epidemiology of Salmonella Typhimurium isolates from different sources in Brazil using comparative genomics.
Efflux pumps
Phylogenetic trees
Prophages
Protein orthologous clusters
Salmonella Typhimurium
Journal
Gut pathogens
ISSN: 1757-4749
Titre abrégé: Gut Pathog
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101474263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Apr 2021
28 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
10
02
2021
accepted:
16
04
2021
entrez:
29
4
2021
pubmed:
30
4
2021
medline:
30
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) is an important zoonotic agent worldwide. The aim of this work was to compare genetically 117 S. Typhimurium isolated from different sources over 30 years in Brazil using different genomics strategies. The majority of the 117 S. Typhimurium strains studied were grouped into a single cluster (≅ 90%) by the core genome multilocus sequence typing and (≅ 77%) by single copy marker genes. The phylogenetic analysis based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) grouped most strains from humans into a single cluster (≅ 93%), while the strains isolated from food and swine were alocated into three clusters. The different orthologous protein clusters found for some S. Typhimurium isolated from humans and food are involved in metabolic and regulatory processes. For 26 isolates from swine the sequence types (ST) 19 and ST1921 were the most prevalent ones, and the ST14, ST64, ST516 and ST639 were also detected. Previous results typed the 91 S. Typhimurium isolates from humans and foods as ST19, ST313, ST1921, ST3343 and ST1649. The main prophages detected were: Gifsy-2 in 79 (67.5%) and Gifsy-1 in 63 (54%) strains. All of the S. Typhimurium isolates contained the acrA, acrB, macA, macB, mdtK, emrA, emrB, emrR and tolC efflux pump genes. The phylogenetic trees grouped the majority of the S. Typhimurium isolates from humans into a single cluster suggesting that there is one prevalent subtype in Brazil. Regarding strains isolated from food and swine, the SNPs' results suggested the circulation of more than one subtype over 30 years in this country. The orthologous protein clusters analysis revealed unique genes in the strains studied mainly related to bacterial metabolism. S. Typhimurium strains from swine showed greater diversity of STs and prophages in comparison to strains isolated from humans and foods. The pathogenic potential of S. Typhimurium strains was corroborated by the presence of exclusive prophages of this serovar involved in its virulence. The high number of resistance genes related to efflux pumps is worrying and may lead to therapeutic failures when clinical treatment is needed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) is an important zoonotic agent worldwide. The aim of this work was to compare genetically 117 S. Typhimurium isolated from different sources over 30 years in Brazil using different genomics strategies.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The majority of the 117 S. Typhimurium strains studied were grouped into a single cluster (≅ 90%) by the core genome multilocus sequence typing and (≅ 77%) by single copy marker genes. The phylogenetic analysis based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) grouped most strains from humans into a single cluster (≅ 93%), while the strains isolated from food and swine were alocated into three clusters. The different orthologous protein clusters found for some S. Typhimurium isolated from humans and food are involved in metabolic and regulatory processes. For 26 isolates from swine the sequence types (ST) 19 and ST1921 were the most prevalent ones, and the ST14, ST64, ST516 and ST639 were also detected. Previous results typed the 91 S. Typhimurium isolates from humans and foods as ST19, ST313, ST1921, ST3343 and ST1649. The main prophages detected were: Gifsy-2 in 79 (67.5%) and Gifsy-1 in 63 (54%) strains. All of the S. Typhimurium isolates contained the acrA, acrB, macA, macB, mdtK, emrA, emrB, emrR and tolC efflux pump genes.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The phylogenetic trees grouped the majority of the S. Typhimurium isolates from humans into a single cluster suggesting that there is one prevalent subtype in Brazil. Regarding strains isolated from food and swine, the SNPs' results suggested the circulation of more than one subtype over 30 years in this country. The orthologous protein clusters analysis revealed unique genes in the strains studied mainly related to bacterial metabolism. S. Typhimurium strains from swine showed greater diversity of STs and prophages in comparison to strains isolated from humans and foods. The pathogenic potential of S. Typhimurium strains was corroborated by the presence of exclusive prophages of this serovar involved in its virulence. The high number of resistance genes related to efflux pumps is worrying and may lead to therapeutic failures when clinical treatment is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33910644
doi: 10.1186/s13099-021-00423-7
pii: 10.1186/s13099-021-00423-7
pmc: PMC8082823
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
27Subventions
Organisme : Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
ID : 2016/24716-3
Organisme : Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
ID : 2019/19338-8
Organisme : Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
ID : 2017/06633-6
Organisme : Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
ID : Finance code 001
Organisme : Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
ID : 304399/2018-3
Références
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Jul;57(7):3348-57
pubmed: 23650175
Oman Med J. 2019 May;34(3):184-193
pubmed: 31110624
Genomics. 2019 Jul;111(4):958-965
pubmed: 29908320
APMIS. 2014 Mar;122(3):215-22
pubmed: 23763723
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004 Sep;68(3):560-602, table of contents
pubmed: 15353570
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jul 2;47(W1):W52-W58
pubmed: 31053848
Mol Microbiol. 1999 Jul;33(1):167-76
pubmed: 10411733
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 11;10(9):e0137967
pubmed: 26360603
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jul 1;43(W1):W78-84
pubmed: 25964301
PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(6):e1002776
pubmed: 22737074
Infect Genet Evol. 2017 Jul;51:41-44
pubmed: 28288927
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 13;13(8):e0201882
pubmed: 30102733
PLoS Med. 2015 Dec 03;12(12):e1001921
pubmed: 26633831
Vet World. 2019;12(4):504-521
pubmed: 31190705
Genome Biol. 2001;2(8):INTERACTIONS1002
pubmed: 11532207
Infect Genet Evol. 2018 Aug;62:109-121
pubmed: 29684710
BMC Genomics. 2013 Oct 20;14:718
pubmed: 24138507
J Microbiol Methods. 2017 Feb;133:55-61
pubmed: 28034696
Microbiology (Reading). 2014 Nov;160(Pt 11):2366-2373
pubmed: 25122880
Mol Microbiol. 2019 Feb;111(2):303-316
pubmed: 30466179
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Dec 1;35(12):3041-3043
pubmed: 30351396
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W16-21
pubmed: 27141966
Microbiology (Reading). 2007 Apr;153(Pt 4):1207-1220
pubmed: 17379730
J Appl Microbiol. 2016 Jun;120(6):1677-90
pubmed: 26913828
J Comput Biol. 2012 May;19(5):455-77
pubmed: 22506599
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Jul;65(7):1372-6
pubmed: 20495209
Genome Announc. 2016 Sep 22;4(5):
pubmed: 27660768
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55687
pubmed: 23409020
PLoS Genet. 2018 Apr 5;14(4):e1007261
pubmed: 29621240
Bioinformatics. 2013 Apr 15;29(8):1072-5
pubmed: 23422339
Genome Announc. 2018 Apr 19;6(16):
pubmed: 29674535
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 11;9(8):e104984
pubmed: 25110940
J Med Microbiol. 2015 Nov;64(11):1395-1407
pubmed: 26307078
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Jul 1;85(14):
pubmed: 31053586
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Mar;51(3):973-8
pubmed: 23325816
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014 Oct 17;453(2):254-67
pubmed: 24878531
BMC Genomics. 2009 Dec 11;10:597
pubmed: 20003346
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Apr;50(4):1355-61
pubmed: 22238442
BMC Genomics. 2018 Jan 19;19(Suppl 1):921
pubmed: 29363425