Interruptions to Attending Physician Rounds and Their Effect on Resident Education.
Journal
Journal of graduate medical education
ISSN: 1949-8357
Titre abrégé: J Grad Med Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101521733
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
26
06
2020
revised:
15
10
2020
revised:
15
01
2021
accepted:
20
01
2021
entrez:
26
4
2021
pubmed:
27
4
2021
medline:
29
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Daily attending rounds (AR) are a cornerstone of teaching and patient care in academic health centers. Interruptions in health care are common and can cause increased risk of errors, incomplete work, and decreased decision-making accuracy. Interruptions to AR may diminish a trainee's capacity to learn and retain information. We characterized and quantified interruptions that occur during AR. We used a mixed There were 378 observed interruptions over the course of 30 AR sessions, averaging 12.6 (range 1-22, median 13) interruptions per rounding session. Bedside nursing staff was the most common source of interruptions (25%) and consultant recommendations was the most common topic of interruption (21%). Most interruptions occurred during patient presentations (76%), and the most common method of interaction was text message (24%). Most team members described negative effects of interruptions, including loss of focus and missing critical clinical information; some also reported that certain interruptions had positive effects on education and clinical care. Interns were more likely to report negative emotional reactions to interruptions. AR are frequently interrupted for non-urgent topics by a variety of methods and sources. Negative effects included loss of focus, missed information, and increased stress. Proactive communication, particularly between physicians and nurses, was suggested to reduce interruptions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Daily attending rounds (AR) are a cornerstone of teaching and patient care in academic health centers. Interruptions in health care are common and can cause increased risk of errors, incomplete work, and decreased decision-making accuracy. Interruptions to AR may diminish a trainee's capacity to learn and retain information.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
We characterized and quantified interruptions that occur during AR.
METHODS
METHODS
We used a mixed
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were 378 observed interruptions over the course of 30 AR sessions, averaging 12.6 (range 1-22, median 13) interruptions per rounding session. Bedside nursing staff was the most common source of interruptions (25%) and consultant recommendations was the most common topic of interruption (21%). Most interruptions occurred during patient presentations (76%), and the most common method of interaction was text message (24%). Most team members described negative effects of interruptions, including loss of focus and missing critical clinical information; some also reported that certain interruptions had positive effects on education and clinical care. Interns were more likely to report negative emotional reactions to interruptions.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
AR are frequently interrupted for non-urgent topics by a variety of methods and sources. Negative effects included loss of focus, missed information, and increased stress. Proactive communication, particularly between physicians and nurses, was suggested to reduce interruptions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33897961
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00698.1
pmc: PMC8054601
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
266-275Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no competing interests. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Références
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jun 24;173(12):1084-9
pubmed: 23649040
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Nov;27(11):1492-8
pubmed: 22722975
Hosp Pediatr. 2017 Mar;7(3):134-139
pubmed: 28148543
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):154-61
pubmed: 25422480
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Jun;5(2):232-7
pubmed: 24404265
J Hosp Med. 2017 Mar;12(3):143-149
pubmed: 28272589
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec;5(4):594-9
pubmed: 24455007
J Nurs Manag. 2010 Nov;18(8):1040-7
pubmed: 21073575
JAAPA. 2018 Jun;31(6):41-45
pubmed: 29846315
J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Dec;6(4):750-5
pubmed: 26140131
Hosp Pract (1995). 2015;43(3):186-90
pubmed: 25936415
J Grad Med Educ. 2011 Jun;3(2):144-50
pubmed: 22655134
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Dec;4(4):467-71
pubmed: 24294423
Teach Learn Med. 2009 Apr-Jun;21(2):105-10
pubmed: 19330687
Top Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;3(2):227-30
pubmed: 25164288
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Acad Med. 2015 Apr;90(4):511-7
pubmed: 25565260
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Jun;5(2):337-9
pubmed: 24404286
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;68(2):189-95
pubmed: 26585046
Emerg Med J. 2020 Aug 5;:
pubmed: 32759349
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):655-663
pubmed: 29317463
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 22;7(12):e019074
pubmed: 29275350
Qual Health Res. 2002 Jul;12(6):855-66
pubmed: 12109729
Med Teach. 2014 May;36(5):371-84
pubmed: 24593808