Reproducibility and accuracy of microscale thermophoresis in the NanoTemper Monolith: a multi laboratory benchmark study.
Benchmark
Interaction
K D
MST
TRIC
Thermophoresis
Journal
European biophysics journal : EBJ
ISSN: 1432-1017
Titre abrégé: Eur Biophys J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8409413
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
15
10
2020
accepted:
26
03
2021
revised:
22
03
2021
pubmed:
22
4
2021
medline:
30
11
2021
entrez:
21
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Microscale thermophoresis (MST), and the closely related Temperature Related Intensity Change (TRIC), are synonyms for a recently developed measurement technique in the field of biophysics to quantify biomolecular interactions, using the (capillary-based) NanoTemper Monolith and (multiwell plate-based) Dianthus instruments. Although this technique has been extensively used within the scientific community due to its low sample consumption, ease of use, and ubiquitous applicability, MST/TRIC has not enjoyed the unambiguous acceptance from biophysicists afforded to other biophysical techniques like isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) or surface plasmon resonance (SPR). This might be attributed to several facts, e.g., that various (not fully understood) effects are contributing to the signal, that the technique is licensed to only a single instrument developer, NanoTemper Technology, and that its reliability and reproducibility have never been tested independently and systematically. Thus, a working group of ARBRE-MOBIEU has set up a benchmark study on MST/TRIC to assess this technique as a method to characterize biomolecular interactions. Here we present the results of this study involving 32 scientific groups within Europe and two groups from the US, carrying out experiments on 40 Monolith instruments, employing a standard operation procedure and centrally prepared samples. A protein-small molecule interaction, a newly developed protein-protein interaction system and a pure dye were used as test systems. We characterized the instrument properties and evaluated instrument performance, reproducibility, the effect of different analysis tools, the influence of the experimenter during data analysis, and thus the overall reliability of this method.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33881594
doi: 10.1007/s00249-021-01532-6
pii: 10.1007/s00249-021-01532-6
pmc: PMC8519905
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
411-427Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U105184326
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010 Mar 15;49(12):2238-41
pubmed: 20186894
Eur Biophys J. 2021 May;50(3-4):653-660
pubmed: 33864492
Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Apr 28;96(16):168301
pubmed: 16712279
Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 2013 Oct 15;128:9-16
pubmed: 24678137
Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2011 Aug;9(4):342-53
pubmed: 21812660
Eur Biophys J. 2021 May;50(3-4):661-670
pubmed: 33837826
Anal Biochem. 2016 Mar 1;496:79-93
pubmed: 26739938
J Biol Chem. 2002 Aug 16;277(33):29897-907
pubmed: 12048184
Eur Biophys J. 2021 May;50(3-4):333-343
pubmed: 33839878