Tuberculosis Drug Susceptibility, Treatment, and Outcomes for Belarusian HIV-Positive Patients with Tuberculosis: Results from a National and International Laboratory.


Journal

Tuberculosis research and treatment
ISSN: 2090-150X
Titre abrégé: Tuberc Res Treat
Pays: Egypt
ID NLM: 101576351

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 27 10 2020
revised: 10 02 2021
accepted: 22 02 2021
entrez: 19 4 2021
pubmed: 20 4 2021
medline: 20 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To cure drug-resistant (DR) tuberculosis (TB), the antituberculous treatment should be guided by Thirty TB/HIV coinfected patients from Minsk were included and descriptive statistics applied. Based on results from Minsk, 10 (33%) TB/HIV patients had drug-sensitive TB. Two (7%) had isoniazid monoresistant TB, 8 (27%) had multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB, 5 (17%) preextensive drug-resistant (preXDR) TB, and 5 (17%) had extensive drug-resistant (XDR) TB. For the first-line drugs rifampicin and isoniazid, there was DST agreement between Minsk and Copenhagen for 90% patients. For the second-line anti-TB drugs, discrepancies were more pronounced. For 14 (47%) patients, there were disagreements for at least one drug, and 4 (13%) patients were classified as having MDR-TB in Minsk but were classified as having preXDR-TB based on DST results in Copenhagen. Initially, all patients received standard anti-TB treatment with rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. However, this was only suitable for 40% of the patients based on DST. On average, DR-TB patients were changed to 4 (IQR 3-5) active drugs after 1.5 months (IQR 1-2). After treatment adjustment, the treatment duration was 8 months (IQR 2-11). Four (22%) patients with DR-TB received treatment for >18 months. In total, sixteen (53%) patients died during 24 months of follow-up. We found high concordance for rifampicin and isoniazid DST between the Minsk and Copenhagen laboratories, whereas discrepancies for second-line drugs were more pronounced. For patients with DR-TB, treatment was often insufficient and relevant adjustments delayed. This example from Minsk, Belarus, underlines two crucial points in the management of DR-TB: the urgent need for implementation of rapid molecular DSTs and availability of second-line drugs in all DR-TB high-burden settings. Carefully designed individualized treatment regimens in accordance with DST patterns will likely improve patients' outcome and reduce transmission with drug-resistant

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To cure drug-resistant (DR) tuberculosis (TB), the antituberculous treatment should be guided by
METHODS METHODS
Thirty TB/HIV coinfected patients from Minsk were included and descriptive statistics applied.
RESULTS RESULTS
Based on results from Minsk, 10 (33%) TB/HIV patients had drug-sensitive TB. Two (7%) had isoniazid monoresistant TB, 8 (27%) had multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB, 5 (17%) preextensive drug-resistant (preXDR) TB, and 5 (17%) had extensive drug-resistant (XDR) TB. For the first-line drugs rifampicin and isoniazid, there was DST agreement between Minsk and Copenhagen for 90% patients. For the second-line anti-TB drugs, discrepancies were more pronounced. For 14 (47%) patients, there were disagreements for at least one drug, and 4 (13%) patients were classified as having MDR-TB in Minsk but were classified as having preXDR-TB based on DST results in Copenhagen. Initially, all patients received standard anti-TB treatment with rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. However, this was only suitable for 40% of the patients based on DST. On average, DR-TB patients were changed to 4 (IQR 3-5) active drugs after 1.5 months (IQR 1-2). After treatment adjustment, the treatment duration was 8 months (IQR 2-11). Four (22%) patients with DR-TB received treatment for >18 months. In total, sixteen (53%) patients died during 24 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We found high concordance for rifampicin and isoniazid DST between the Minsk and Copenhagen laboratories, whereas discrepancies for second-line drugs were more pronounced. For patients with DR-TB, treatment was often insufficient and relevant adjustments delayed. This example from Minsk, Belarus, underlines two crucial points in the management of DR-TB: the urgent need for implementation of rapid molecular DSTs and availability of second-line drugs in all DR-TB high-burden settings. Carefully designed individualized treatment regimens in accordance with DST patterns will likely improve patients' outcome and reduce transmission with drug-resistant

Identifiants

pubmed: 33868727
doi: 10.1155/2021/6646239
pmc: PMC8035031
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

6646239

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Daria N. Podlekareva et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None of the coauthors have any conflicts of interests to declare.

Références

Drug Discov Today Dis Mech. 2010 Spring;7(1):e43-e59
pubmed: 21076640
Public Health Action. 2014 Oct 21;4(Suppl 2):S24-8
pubmed: 26393093
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Feb;55(2):457-469
pubmed: 27903602
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 8;8(1):11869
pubmed: 30089859
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Sep 1;194(5):621-30
pubmed: 26910495
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2014 Jun;11(2):168-76
pubmed: 24652411
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Aug;51(8):2641-5
pubmed: 23761146
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 28;380(13):1201-1213
pubmed: 30865791
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jun;47(6):1767-72
pubmed: 19386845
PLoS Med. 2012;9(8):e1001300
pubmed: 22952439
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014 Oct;18(10):1180-7
pubmed: 25216831
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Dec;51(12):4220-2
pubmed: 24068005
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan 25;62(2):
pubmed: 29133554
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Mar;23(3):161-166
pubmed: 27789378
HIV Med. 2015 Oct;16(9):544-52
pubmed: 25959854
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 May 25;56(6):
pubmed: 29593055
J Infect. 2018 Jan;76(1):44-54
pubmed: 29061336
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jun;53(6):1908-14
pubmed: 25854485
Lancet HIV. 2016 Mar;3(3):e120-31
pubmed: 26939735
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Mar 1;22(3):239-245
pubmed: 29471899
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Nov 02;17(4 Suppl 3):19505
pubmed: 25394014
Eur Respir J. 2012 Jun;39(6):1425-31
pubmed: 22005924
Eur Respir J. 2011 Sep;38(3):516-28
pubmed: 21828024
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Jan 1;91(1):36-45
pubmed: 23397349

Auteurs

Daria N Podlekareva (DN)

CHIP, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Dorte Bek Folkvardsen (DB)

International Reference Laboratory of Mycobacteriology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Alena Skrahina (A)

Republican Scientific and Practical Center for Pulmonology and TB, Minsk, Belarus.

Anna Vassilenko (A)

Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk, Belarus.

Aliaksandr Skrahin (A)

Republican Scientific and Practical Center for Pulmonology and TB, Minsk, Belarus.
Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk, Belarus.

Henadz Hurevich (H)

Republican Scientific and Practical Center for Pulmonology and TB, Minsk, Belarus.

Dzmitry Klimuk (D)

Republican Scientific and Practical Center for Pulmonology and TB, Minsk, Belarus.

Igor Karpov (I)

Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk, Belarus.

Jens D Lundgren (JD)

CHIP, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Ole Kirk (O)

CHIP, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Troels Lillebaek (T)

International Reference Laboratory of Mycobacteriology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH