Quality control of cytostatic drug preparations-comparison of workflow and performance of Raman/UV and high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode array detection (HPLC-DAD).
Antineoplastic Agents
/ analysis
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
/ methods
Cyclophosphamide
/ analysis
Cytostatic Agents
/ analysis
Deoxycytidine
/ analogs & derivatives
Drug Compounding
Drug Stability
Drug Storage
Fluorouracil
/ analysis
Irinotecan
/ analysis
Quality Control
Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet
/ methods
Spectrum Analysis, Raman
/ methods
Workflow
Gemcitabine
Cytostatic drug preparations
HPLC-DAD
Method comparison
Quality control
Raman/UV
Uncertainty of measurement
Journal
Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry
ISSN: 1618-2650
Titre abrégé: Anal Bioanal Chem
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101134327
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
20
11
2020
accepted:
06
02
2021
revised:
11
01
2021
pubmed:
25
2
2021
medline:
16
7
2021
entrez:
24
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The drugs used for treatment during chemotherapy are manufactured individually for each patient in specialised pharmacies. Thorough quality control to confirm the identity of the delivered active pharmaceutical ingredient and the final concentration of the prepared application solution is not standardized yet except for optical or gravimetric testing. However, solution stability problems, counterfeit drugs, and erroneous or deliberate underdosage may occur and negatively influence the quality of the product and could cause severe health risks for the patient. To take a step towards analytical quality control, an on-site analytical instrument using Raman and UV absorption spectroscopy was employed and the results were compared to high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to diode array detection. Within the scope of the technology evaluation, the uncertainty of measurement was determined for the analysis of the five frequently used cytostatic drugs 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, gemcitabine, irinotecan and paclitaxel. The Raman/UV technique (2.0-3.2% uncertainty of measurement; level of confidence: 95%) achieves a combined uncertainty of measurement comparable to HPLC-DAD (1.7-3.2% uncertainty of measurement; level of confidence: 95%) for the substances 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide and gemcitabine. However, the uncertainty of measurement for the substances irinotecan and paclitaxel is three times higher when the Raman/UV technique is used. This is due to the fact that the Raman/UV technique analyses the undiluted sample; therefore, the sample has a higher viscosity and tendency to foam. Out of 136 patient-specific preparations analysed within this study, 96% had a deviation of less than 10% from the target content.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33624127
doi: 10.1007/s00216-021-03223-9
pii: 10.1007/s00216-021-03223-9
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Cytostatic Agents
0
Deoxycytidine
0W860991D6
Irinotecan
7673326042
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Gemcitabine
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2587-2596Subventions
Organisme : B&W Tek
ID : Borrowing the i-QCRx
Références
Muller T. Typical medication errors in oncology: analysis and prevention strategies. Onkologie. 2003;26(6):539–44. https://doi.org/10.1159/000074148 .
doi: 10.1159/000074148
pubmed: 14709927
Sendra-Garcia A, Martinez-Gomez MA, Albert-Mari A, Jimenez-Torres NV, Climente-Marti M. Quantitative and qualitative control of antineoplastic preparations: Gravimetry versus HPLC. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019;25(5):1204–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155219834999 .
doi: 10.1177/1078155219834999
pubmed: 30895861
Benizri F, Dalifard B, Zemmour C, Henriquet M, Fougereau E, Le Franc B. DrugCam (R)-an intelligent video camera system to make safe cytotoxic drug preparations. Int J Pharm. 2016;502(1–2):198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.02.028 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.02.028
pubmed: 26923317
Bazin C, Cassard B, Caudron E, Prognon P, Havard L. Comparative analysis of methods for real-time analytical control of chemotherapies preparations. Int J Pharm. 2015;494(1):329–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.041 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.041
pubmed: 26299761
Lagarce F. Centrally prepared cytotoxic drugs: what is the purpose of their quality control? Pharm Technol Hosp Pharm. 2017;2(1):29–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp-2017-0006 .
doi: 10.1515/pthp-2017-0006
Bouligand J, Paci A, Mercier L, Vassal G, Bourget P. High-performance thin-layer chromatography with a derivatization procedure, a suitable method for the identification and the quantitation of busulfan in various pharmaceutical products. J Pharmaceut Biomed. 2004;34(3):525–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(03)00630-7 .
doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(03)00630-7
Paci A, Mercier L, Bourget P. Identification and quantitation of antineoplastic compounds in chemotherapeutic infusion bags by use of HPTLC: application to the vinca-alkaloids. J Pharmaceut Biomed. 2003;30(5):1603–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(02)00541-1 .
doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(02)00541-1
Delmas A, Gordien JB, Bernadou JM, Roudaut M, Gresser A, Malki L, et al. Quantitative and qualitative control of cytotoxic preparations by HPLC-UV in a centralized parenteral preparations unit. J Pharmaceut Biomed. 2009;49(5):1213–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2009.03.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.03.007
Jaccoulet E, Schweitzer-Chaput A, Toussaint B, Prognon P, Caudron E. Simple and ultra-fast recognition and quantitation of compounded monoclonal antibodies: application to flow injection analysis combined to UV spectroscopy and matching method. Talanta. 2018;187:279–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.05.042 .
doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.05.042
pubmed: 29853048
Jaccoulet E, Smadja C, Prognon P, Taverna M. Capillary electrophoresis for rapid identification of monoclonal antibodies for routine application in hospital. Electrophoresis. 2015;36(17):2050–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201400603 .
doi: 10.1002/elps.201400603
pubmed: 25964136
Nardella F, Beck M, Collart-Dutilleul P, Becker G, Boulanger C, Perello L, et al. A UV-Raman spectrometry method for quality control of anticancer preparations: results after 18 months of implementation in hospital pharmacy. Int J Pharm. 2016;499(1–2):343–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.01.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.01.002
pubmed: 26772534
Chouquet T, Benoit G, Morand K. Analytical control of pediatric chemotherapy preparations with a UV-Raman automaton: results after 18 months of implementation and development of a suitable method for low volume preparations. Pharm Technol Hosp Pharm. 2017;2(3):117–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp-2017-0021 .
doi: 10.1515/pthp-2017-0021
Le LMM, Caudron E, Baillet-Guffroy A, Eyeleigh L. Non-invasive quantification of 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine in aqueous matrix by direct measurement through glass vials using near-infrared spectroscopy. Talanta. 2014;119:361–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2013.10.060 .
doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.10.060
pubmed: 24401426
Le L, Berge M, Tfayli A, Guffroy AB, Prognon P, Dowek A, et al. Quantification of gemcitabine intravenous drugs by direct measurement in chemotherapy plastic bags using a handheld Raman spectrometer. Talanta. 2019;196:376–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.11.062 .
doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.11.062
pubmed: 30683379
Deutscher Apotheker Verlag. European Pharmacopoeia, 9th Ed.; 2018.
Schmiedel. DA-VDR. USP 42 - NF 37 The United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary 2019: Main Edition Plus Supplements 1 and 2; 2018.
Swissmedic. Pharmacopoea Helvetica, 11th Ed.; 2019.
Busch A. Ergebnisse von Apothekenkontrollen Aktenzeichen IV B 5 - G.0611; 2019.
Council Directive. Council Directive 90/394/EEC of 28 June 1990 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens at work (Sixth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC); 1990.
Working Group 1 of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement; 2008.
Mandel J. The statistical analysis of experimental data. Washington: Wiley; 1964.
Pharmacopoea Europaea. Test for extractable volume of parenteral preparations; 2018.
Cohen MR, Smetzer JL. Understanding and managing intravenous container overfill; potential dose confusion. Hosp Pharm. 2014;49(3):221–6. https://doi.org/10.1310/hpj4903-221 .
doi: 10.1310/hpj4903-221
pubmed: 24715738
pmcid: 3971104
Thiessen JJ. A review of the oncology under-dosing incident. 2013. URL: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/public/programs/cancer/drugsupply/docs/report_thiessen_oncology_under-dosing.pdf Last accessed: 07.09.2020.
DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025:2018 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. 2017.
Dziopa F, Galy G, Bauler S, Vincent B, Crochon S, Tall ML, et al. A quantitative and qualitative method to control chemotherapeutic preparations by Fourier transform infrared–ultraviolet spectrophotometry. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2013;19(2):121–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155212457963 .
doi: 10.1177/1078155212457963
pubmed: 23014899