Not Telehealth: Which Primary Care Visits Need In-Person Care?


Journal

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
ISSN: 1558-7118
Titre abrégé: J Am Board Fam Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101256526

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 21 05 2020
revised: 10 07 2020
accepted: 13 07 2020
entrez: 24 2 2021
pubmed: 25 2 2021
medline: 10 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) pandemic has resulted in a rapid shift to telehealth and many services that need in-person care have been avoided. Yet, as practices and payment policies return to a new normal, there will be many questions about what proportion of visits should be done in-person vs telehealth. Using the 2016 National Ambulatory Medical Survey (NAMCS), we estimated what proportion of visits were amenable to telehealth before COVID-19 as a guide. We divided services into those that needed in-person care and those that could be done via telehealth. Any visit that included at least 1 service where in-person care was needed was counted as an in-person only visit. We then calculated what proportion of reported visits and services in 2016 could have been provided via telehealth, as well as what proportion of in-person only services were done by primary care. We found that 66% of all primary care visits reported in NAMCS in 2016 required an in-person service. 90% of all wellness visits and immunizations were done in primary care offices, as were a quarter of all Papanicolaou smears. As practices reopen, patients will need to catch up on many of the in-person only visits that were postponed such as Papanicolaou smears and wellness visits. At the same time, patients and clinicians now accustomed to telehealth may have reservations about returning to in-person only visits. Our estimates may provide a guide to practices as they navigate how to deliver care in a post-COVID-19 environment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33622832
pii: 34/Supplement/S162
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.S1.200247
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

S162-S169

Informations de copyright

© Copyright 2021 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interest: We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Auteurs

Yalda Jabbarpour (Y)

From the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Primary Care, Washington, DC (YJ, AJ, JW); Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA (MW). yjabbarpour@aafp.org.

Anuradha Jetty (A)

From the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Primary Care, Washington, DC (YJ, AJ, JW); Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA (MW).

Matthew Westfall (M)

From the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Primary Care, Washington, DC (YJ, AJ, JW); Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA (MW).

John Westfall (J)

From the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Primary Care, Washington, DC (YJ, AJ, JW); Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA (MW).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH