Cerebrolysin after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: prospective meta-analysis of the CAPTAIN trial series.
Cerebrolysin
Moderate-severe traumatic brain injury
Journal
Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
ISSN: 1590-3478
Titre abrégé: Neurol Sci
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 100959175
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
15
10
2020
accepted:
07
12
2020
pubmed:
24
2
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
23
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This prospective meta-analysis summarizes results from the CAPTAIN trial series, evaluating the effects of Cerebrolysin for moderate-severe traumatic brain injury, as an add-on to usual care. The study included two phase IIIb/IV prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Eligible patients with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) between 6 and 12 received study medication (50 mL of Cerebrolysin or physiological saline solution per day for ten days, followed by two additional treatment cycles with 10 mL per day for 10 days) in addition to usual care. The meta-analysis comprises the primary ensembles of efficacy criteria for 90, 30, and 10 days after TBI with a priori ordered hypotheses based on multivariate, directional tests. A total 185 patients underwent meta-analysis (mean admission GCS = 10.3, mean age = 45.3, and mean Baseline Prognostic Risk Score = 2.8). The primary endpoint, a multidimensional ensemble of functional and neuropsychological outcome scales indicated a "small-to-medium" sized effect in favor of Cerebrolysin, statistically significant at Day 30 and at Day 90 (Day 30: MW The meta-analysis of the CAPTAIN trials confirms the safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin after moderate-severe TBI, opening a new horizon for neurorecovery in this field. Integration of Cerebrolysin into existing guidelines should be considered after careful review of internationally applicable criteria.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33620612
doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04974-6
pii: 10.1007/s10072-020-04974-6
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amino Acids
0
Neuroprotective Agents
0
cerebrolysin
37KZM6S21G
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4531-4541Informations de copyright
© 2021. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.
Références
Masel BE, DeWitt DS (2010) Traumatic brain injury: a disease process, not an event. J Neurotrauma 27:1529–1540
pubmed: 20504161
doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1358
pmcid: 20504161
Severe TBI | Concussion | Traumatic Brain Injury | CDC Injury Center (2019) [cited 2019 Jun 22]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/severe.html . Accessed 01 Oct 2020
von Wild K (2000) Perioperative management of severe head injuries in adults. In: Schmidek and Sweet Operative Neurosurgical Techniques: Indications, Methods, and Results, 4th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 45–60
von Wild K (1988) Encephalotropic drugs in neurology and neurosurgery. Higher nervous functions. 7th Asian Oceanian Congress of Neurology
von Wild KRH (2005) Neurorehabilitation following Craniocerebral trauma. Eur J Trauma 31:344–358
doi: 10.1007/s00068-005-2059-z
Wild KV, Dolce G (1976) Pathophysiological aspects concerning the treatment of the apallic syndrome. J Neurol 213:143–148
pubmed: 60473
doi: 10.1007/BF00313275
pmcid: 60473
Wild KV, Gerstenbrand F, Dolce G, Binder H, Vos PE, Saltuari L et al (2007) Guidelines for quality management of apallic syndrome / vegetative state. European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European trauma society. Urban und Vogel 33:268–292
Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F, Lavrijsen J, León-Carrión J, Sannita WG et al (2010) Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med 8:68
pubmed: 21040571
pmcid: 2987895
doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-68
Muresanu DF, Strilciuc S, Stan A (2019) Current drug treatment of acute ischemic stroke: challenges and opportunities. CNS Drugs 33(9):841–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-019-00663-x
Muresanu DF, Buzoianu A, Florian SI, von Wild T, Muresanu D (2012) Towards a roadmap in brain protection and recovery. J Cell Mol Med 16:2861–2871
pubmed: 22863521
pmcid: 4393716
doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01605.x
Poon W, Vos P, Muresanu D, Vester J, von Wild K, Hömberg V, Wang E, Lee TMC, Matula C (2015) Cerebrolysin Asian Pacific trial in acute brain injury and neurorecovery: design and methods. J Neurotrauma 32:571–580
pubmed: 25222349
doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3558
pmcid: 25222349
Poon W, Matula C, Vos PE, Muresanu DF, von Steinbüchel N, von Wild K, Hömberg V, Wang E, Lee TMC, Strilciuc S, Vester JC (2020) Safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in acute brain injury and neurorecovery: CAPTAIN I-a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, Asian-Pacific trial. Neurol Sci 41(2):281–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04053-5 . Erratum in: Neurol Sci. 2020 Jan 6
Muresanu DF, Florian S, Hömberg V, Matula C, von Steinbüchel N, Vos PE et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of cerebrolysin in neurorecovery after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury: results from the CAPTAIN II trial. Neurol Sci. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04181-y
Muresanu DF, Vester JC (2016) Prospective meta-analysis (PMA) of the Cerebrolysin trials in Neuroprotection and Neurorecovery after traumatic brain injury (CAPTAIN I and CAPTAIN II). Foundation for the Study of Neuroprotection and neuroplasticity. Available from: https://ssnn.ro/images/Images/Research/PMA15062016.pdf . Accessed 01 Oct 2020
Higgins H, van Limbeek J, Geurts A, Zwarts M (2011) Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. [cited 2020 Feb 4];339. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/339/bmj.b2700 . Accessed 01 Oct 2020
Lachin JM (1992) Some large-sample distribution-free estimators and tests for multivariate partially incomplete data from two populations. Stat Med 11:1151–1170
pubmed: 1509217
doi: 10.1002/sim.4780110903
pmcid: 1509217
Wei LJ, Lachin JM (1984) Two-sample asymptotically distribution-free tests for incomplete multivariate observations. J Am Stat Assoc 79:653–661
doi: 10.1080/01621459.1984.10478093
Rahlfs V, Zimmermann H (2019) Effect size measures and their benchmark values for quantifying benefit or risk of medicinal products. Biom J 61:973–982
pubmed: 30821037
pmcid: 6618136
doi: 10.1002/bimj.201800107
D’Agostino RB, Campbell M, Greenhouse J (2006) The Mann–Whitney statistic: continuous use and discovery. Stat Med 25:541–542
doi: 10.1002/sim.2508
Rahlfs VW (2014) Zimmermann Helmuth, lees Kennedy R. effect size measures and their relationships in stroke studies. Stroke. 45:627–633
pubmed: 24370754
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003151
Colditz GA, Miller JN, Mosteller F (1988) Measuring gain in the evaluation of medical technology. The probability of a better outcome. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 4:637–642
pubmed: 10291102
doi: 10.1017/S0266462300007728
Wilson J t L, Pettigrew LE l, Teasdale GM (1998) Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 15:573–585
pubmed: 9726257
doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.573
Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, Brooks N (1981) Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow outcome scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 44:285–293
pubmed: 6453957
pmcid: 490949
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.44.4.285
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW (1965) Functional evaluation: The BARTHEL index. Md State Med J 14:61–65
pubmed: 14258950
pmcid: 14258950
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198
pubmed: 1202204
doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Ryan JJ, Lopez SJ (2001) Wechsler adult intelligence scale-III. In: Dorfman WI, Hersen M (eds) Understanding psychological assessment. Perspectives on individual differences. Springer, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1185-4_2
Donders J, Warschausky S (1997) WISC-III factor index score patterns after traumatic head injury in children. Child Neuropsychol 3:71–78
doi: 10.1080/09297049708401369
Hawkins KA (1998) Indicators of brain dysfunction derived from graphic representations of the WAIS-III/WMS-III technical manual clinical samples data: a preliminary approach to clinical utility. Clin Neuropsychol 12:535–551
doi: 10.1076/clin.12.4.535.7236
Martin TA, Donders J, Thompson E (2000) Potential of and problems with new measures of psychometric intelligence after traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol 45:402–408
doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.45.4.402
Lee TM, Chan CC (2000) Stroop interference in Chinese and English. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 22:465–471
pubmed: 10923056
doi: 10.1076/1380-3395(200008)22:4;1-0;FT465
pmcid: 10923056
Reitan RM, Wolfson D (1993) The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological test battery theory and clinical interpretation, 2nd edn. Neuropsychology Press, Tucson
Mitrushina MN, Boone KB, D’Elia LF (1999) Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, US
Johnson SC, Prigatano GP (2000) Functional MR imaging during finger tapping. Barrow Quarterly. [cited 2019 May 28];16. Available from: https://www.barrowneuro.org/education/grand-rounds-publications-and-media/barrow-quarterly/volume-16-no-3-2000/functional-mr-imaging-during-finger-tapping/ . Accessed 01 Oct 2020
D’Elia LF, Satz P, Uchiyama CL, White T (1996) Color trails test: professional manual. O Taesa: Psychological Assessment Resources
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370
pubmed: 6880820
pmcid: 6880820
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D (2002) The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 52:69–77
pubmed: 11832252
pmcid: 11832252
doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3
Hukkelhoven CWPM, Steyerberg EW, Habbema JDF, Farace E, Marmarou A, Murray GD, Marshall LF, Maas AIR (2005) Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics. J Neurotrauma 22:1025–1039
pubmed: 16238481
doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1025
pmcid: 16238481
Maas AIR, Steyerberg EW, Marmarou A, McHugh GS, Lingsma HF, Butcher I et al (2010) IMPACT recommendations for improving the design and analysis of clinical trials in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics. 7:127–134
pubmed: 20129504
pmcid: 5084119
doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.020
Bagiella E (2009) Clinical trials in rehabilitation: single or multiple outcomes? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:S17–S21
pubmed: 19892070
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.08.133
O’Brien PC, Zhang D, Bailey KR (2005) Semi-parametric and non-parametric methods for clinical trials with incomplete data. Stat Med 24:341–358
pubmed: 15547952
doi: 10.1002/sim.1963
Frick H (1995) Comparing trials with multiple outcomes: the multivariate one-sided hypothesis with unknown Covariances. Biom J 37:909–917
doi: 10.1002/bimj.4710370803
Gail M, Simon R (1985) Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets. Biometrics. 41:361–372
pubmed: 4027319
doi: 10.2307/2530862
Hedges LV, Olkin I (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press, San Diego [cited 2020 Feb 4]. Available from: https://idostatistics.com/hedges-olkin-1985-statistical-methods-for-meta-analysis/ . Accessed 01 Oct 2020
Lachin JM (2011) Biostatistical Methods: The Assessment of Relative Risks, 2nd edn. Wiley [cited 2020 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Biostatistical+Methods%3A+The+Assessment+of+Relative+Risks%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9780470508220 . Accessed 01 Oct 2020
Frick H (1994) A maxmin linear test of normal means and its application to lachin’s data. Commun Stat - Theory Methods 23:1021–1029
doi: 10.1080/03610929408831302
DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188
pubmed: 3802833
pmcid: 3802833
doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley [cited 2020 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/en-ro/Introduction+to+Meta+Analysis-p-9780470057247 . Accessed 01 Oct 2020
Muresanu F-D, Vester J, Strilciuc S (2020) Replication data for: Cerebrolysin after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury: the CAPTAIN meta-analysis. Harvard Dataverse [cited 2020 Oct 13]. Available from: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/2FNZQ8 . Accessed 01 Oct 2020
Gronseth G, Moses Woodroffe LM, Getchius T (2011) Clinical practice guideline process manual. 2011 edition. St. Paul, American Academy of Neurology
Muresanu DF, Heiss W-D, Hoemberg V, Bajenaru O, Popescu CD, Vester JC, Rahlfs VW, Doppler E, Meier D, Moessler H, Guekht A (2016) Cerebrolysin and recovery after stroke (CARS): a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial. Stroke 47:151–159
pubmed: 26564102
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009416
pmcid: 26564102
Bornstein NM (ed) (2009) Stroke. Basel, Karger, pp 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1159/000210271
Alvarez XA, Sampedro C, Pérez P, Laredo M, Couceiro V, Hernández A et al (2003) Positive effects of cerebrolysin on electroencephalogram slowing, cognition and clinical outcome in patients with postacute traumatic brain injury: an exploratory study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 18:271–278
pubmed: 12920387
doi: 10.1097/01.yic.0000085765.24936.9a
pmcid: 12920387
Iznak EV, Iznak AF, Pankratova EA, Zavadenko NN, Guzilova LS, Guzilova II (2010) Electrophysiological correlates of efficacy of nootropic drugs in the treatment of consequences of traumatic brain injury in adolescents. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 110:27–32
pubmed: 21322822
pmcid: 21322822
Gruenbaum SE, Zlotnik A, Gruenbaum BF, Hersey D, Bilotta F (2016) Pharmacologic Neuroprotection for functional outcomes after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of the clinical literature. CNS Drugs 30:791–806
pubmed: 27339615
pmcid: 5116376
doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0355-2
El Sayed I, Zaki A, Fayed AM, Shehata GM, Abdelmonem S (2018) A meta-analysis of the effect of different neuroprotective drugs in management of patients with traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Rev 41:427–438
pubmed: 27539610
doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0775-y
pmcid: 27539610
Ghaffarpasand F, Torabi S, Rasti A, Niakan MH, Aghabaklou S, Pakzad F, Beheshtian MS, Tabrizi R (2019) Effects of cerebrolysin on functional outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 15:127–135
pubmed: 30643411
doi: 10.2147/NDT.S186865
pmcid: 30643411
Onose G, Mureşanu DF, Ciurea AV, Daia Chendreanu C, Mihaescu AS, Mardare DC, Andone I, Spânu A, Popescu C, Dumitrescu A, Popescu M, Grigorean V, Ungur B, Marinescu F, Colibbeanu I, Onose L, Haras M, Sandu A, Spircu T (2009) Neuroprotective and consequent neurorehabilitative clinical outcomes, in patients treated with the pleiotropic drug cerebrolysin. J Med Life 2:350–360
pubmed: 20108748
pmcid: 3019019
Ghaffarpasand F, Torabi S, Rasti A, Niakan MH, Aghabaklou S, Pakzad F et al (2019) Effects of cerebrolysin on functional outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 15:127–135
pubmed: 30643411
doi: 10.2147/NDT.S186865
pmcid: 30643411
Chen C-C, Wei S-T, Tsaia S-C, Chen X-X, Cho D-Y (2013) Cerebrolysin enhances cognitive recovery of mild traumatic brain injury patients: double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Br J Neurosurg 27:803–807
pubmed: 23656173
doi: 10.3109/02688697.2013.793287
Weir J, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, Lu J, Lingsma HF, McHugh GS et al (2012) Does the extended Glasgow outcome scale add value to the conventional Glasgow outcome scale? J Neurotrauma 29:53–58
pubmed: 22026476
pmcid: 3253309
doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2137
Prince C, Bruhns ME (2017) Evaluation and treatment of mild traumatic brain injury: the role of neuropsychology. Brain Sci 7(8):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7080105