Processing methods affect phytochemical contents in products prepared from orange-fleshed sweetpotato leaves and roots.

dehydration fermented dehydrated leaves phytochemicals processing methods retention

Journal

Food science & nutrition
ISSN: 2048-7177
Titre abrégé: Food Sci Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101605473

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 23 05 2020
revised: 15 10 2020
accepted: 11 12 2020
entrez: 18 2 2021
pubmed: 19 2 2021
medline: 19 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Phytochemicals enhance human health by acting antagonistically on incidences of cancer and other chronic diseases. They are considered indispensable in a variety of nutraceutical, pharmaceuticals, and medicinal and cosmetic applications. This study evaluated the effects of common processing methods on inherent phytochemical content in the roots and leaves of orange-fleshed sweetpotato (OFSP) varieties called Kabode and SPK031. Yellosp and Whitesp, which are local sweetpotato varieties, were also included as check for roots and leaves, respectively. The sweetpotato products prepared for phytochemical analysis were boiling roots and leaves, frying chips and crisps, baking bread (for roots only), and fermenting and dehydrating leaves. Phytochemicals that were assessed included vitamin C, total phenolics and flavonoids, tannins, phytates, and soluble oxalates. Results indicated that retention of vitamin C was highest in boiled roots (85%-95%), followed by fries (71%-94%) and crisps (44%-76%), whereas the least retention was in bread (4%-11%) and leaves (0%-27%). Total phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant activity in leaves significantly (

Identifiants

pubmed: 33598190
doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2081
pii: FSN32081
pmc: PMC7866603
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1070-1078

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare they do not have any conflict of interest.

Références

J Food Sci Technol. 2011 Aug;48(4):520-4
pubmed: 23572783
Food Chem. 2015 Apr 15;173:957-65
pubmed: 25466112
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(9):1246-69
pubmed: 24915386
Int J Food Sci. 2016;2016:3631647
pubmed: 27127779
Int J Food Sci. 2020 Jan 28;2020:3567972
pubmed: 32083118
Front Chem. 2017 Jul 11;5:50
pubmed: 28744455
Molecules. 2015 May 12;20(5):8521-47
pubmed: 25985355

Auteurs

George Ooko Abong' (GO)

Department of Food Science, Nutrition and Technology University of Nairobi Nairobi Kenya.
Biosciences Eastern and Central Africa International Livestock Research Institute Nairobi Kenya.

Tawanda Muzhingi (T)

Food and Nutritional Evaluation Laboratory International Potato Centre Nairobi Kenya.

Michael Wandayi Okoth (MW)

Department of Food Science, Nutrition and Technology University of Nairobi Nairobi Kenya.

Fredrick Ng'ang'a (F)

Biosciences Eastern and Central Africa International Livestock Research Institute Nairobi Kenya.

Phillis Emelda Ochieng (P)

Biosciences Eastern and Central Africa International Livestock Research Institute Nairobi Kenya.

Daniel Mahuga Mbogo (DM)

Food and Nutritional Evaluation Laboratory International Potato Centre Nairobi Kenya.

Derick Malavi (D)

Food and Nutritional Evaluation Laboratory International Potato Centre Nairobi Kenya.

Machael Akhwale (M)

Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) Kakamega Centre-Root and Tuber Crops Program Kakamega Kenya.

Sita Ghimire (S)

Biosciences Eastern and Central Africa International Livestock Research Institute Nairobi Kenya.

Classifications MeSH