Quality assurance of quantitative cardiac T1-mapping in multicenter clinical trials - A T1 phantom program from the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy registry (HCMR) study.
Cardiac MRI
Multicenter study
Phantom study
Quality assurance
Quantitative T1-mapping
Standardization
Journal
International journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1874-1754
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8200291
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2021
01 05 2021
Historique:
received:
28
11
2020
accepted:
07
01
2021
pubmed:
4
2
2021
medline:
29
5
2021
entrez:
3
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1-mapping is increasingly used for myocardial tissue characterization. However, the lack of standardization limits direct comparability between centers and wider roll-out for clinical use or trials. To develop a quality assurance (QA) program assuring standardized T1 measurements for clinical use. MR phantoms manufactured in 2013 were distributed, including ShMOLLI T1-mapping and reference T1 and T2 protocols. We first studied the T1 and T2 dependency on temperature and phantom aging using phantom datasets from a single site over 4 years. Based on this, we developed a multiparametric QA model, which was then applied to 78 scans from 28 other multi-national sites. T1 temperature sensitivity followed a second-order polynomial to baseline T1 values (R The proposed phantom QA for T1-mapping can assure correct method implementation and protocol adherence, and is robust to temperature variation and phantom aging. This QA program circumvents the need of frequent phantom replacements, and can be readily deployed in multicenter trials.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1-mapping is increasingly used for myocardial tissue characterization. However, the lack of standardization limits direct comparability between centers and wider roll-out for clinical use or trials.
PURPOSE
To develop a quality assurance (QA) program assuring standardized T1 measurements for clinical use.
METHODS
MR phantoms manufactured in 2013 were distributed, including ShMOLLI T1-mapping and reference T1 and T2 protocols. We first studied the T1 and T2 dependency on temperature and phantom aging using phantom datasets from a single site over 4 years. Based on this, we developed a multiparametric QA model, which was then applied to 78 scans from 28 other multi-national sites.
RESULTS
T1 temperature sensitivity followed a second-order polynomial to baseline T1 values (R
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed phantom QA for T1-mapping can assure correct method implementation and protocol adherence, and is robust to temperature variation and phantom aging. This QA program circumvents the need of frequent phantom replacements, and can be readily deployed in multicenter trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33535074
pii: S0167-5273(21)00107-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.01.026
pmc: PMC7994017
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
251-258Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N003403/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : PG/15/71/31731
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL117006
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest SKP has patent authorship rights for U.S. patent US20120078084A1. Systems and methods for shortened Look Locker inversion recovery (Sh-MOLLI) cardiac gated mapping of T1. Granted March 15, 2016. IP is managed by Oxford University Innovations; the license exclusively transferred to Siemens Healthcare. QZ, SKP, KW, IAP, VMF have authorship rights for pending patent PCT/GB2020/051189. A method for identity validation and quality assurance of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging protocols. Filed May 15, 2020. IP is owned and managed by Oxford University Innovations.
Références
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Oct 9;19(1):75
pubmed: 28992817
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Mar 1;326:220-225
pubmed: 33096146
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Oct 14;15:92
pubmed: 24124732
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Sep 28;19(1):74
pubmed: 28954631
Am Heart J. 2015 Aug;170(2):223-30
pubmed: 26299218
Eur Radiol. 2015 Aug;25(8):2381-9
pubmed: 25636417
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 May 7;22(1):31
pubmed: 32375896
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010 Nov 19;12:69
pubmed: 21092095
Radiology. 2016 Mar;278(3):658-76
pubmed: 26885733
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jan 1;298:128-134
pubmed: 31500864
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Sep 22;18(1):58
pubmed: 27660042