Virtual Mentoring: Two Adaptive Models for Supporting Early-career Simulation Investigators in the Era of Social Distancing.
Journal
AEM education and training
ISSN: 2472-5390
Titre abrégé: AEM Educ Train
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101722142
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
14
07
2020
revised:
17
09
2020
accepted:
21
09
2020
entrez:
1
2
2021
pubmed:
2
2
2021
medline:
2
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early-career simulation investigators identify limited mentorship as a common barrier to disseminating scholarship and launching a successful academic career in emergency medicine (EM). Conferences often bridge this gap, but the COVID-19 pandemic has forced their indefinite delay. Virtual solutions are needed to capitalize on the breadth of national simulation research experts and grow mentorship in a postpandemic world. We developed two complementary innovations to facilitate scholarship development and minimize COVID-associated career challenges resulting from social distancing requirements. The e-fellows forum (FF) provides a capstone experience for works-in-progress and the e-consultation service (CS) supports simulation research during the earlier project stages of design and development. In conjunction with the Society for Academic Medicine's Simulation Academy, we applied videoconferencing technology for both of these novel, virtual innovations. We analyzed corresponding chat transcripts and detailed field notes for emerging themes. In addition, we collected quantitative data via participant surveys regarding their experiences and impact on their projects. Nine simulation fellows presented at the FF and seven junior simulation investigators participated in the CS sessions. Most preferred the virtual format (56% FF, 66% CS) and found the sessions to be helpful in project advancement (66% FF, 100% CS). COVID-19 affected most projects (89% FF, 67% CS). We identified three themes via qualitative analysis: design concerns and inquiries, validation or support shown by mentors and peers, and professional cohesion. Participants felt that both virtual mentorship innovations advanced their simulation research projects and fostered a sense of professional cohesion within a greater community of practice. These benefits can be powerful at a time where simulation researchers in EM feel disconnected in an era of social distancing. Our future work will include adaptations to a hybrid model with both virtual and in-person modalities as well as creation of more e-mentorship opportunities, thus broadening the early-career simulation research community of practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Early-career simulation investigators identify limited mentorship as a common barrier to disseminating scholarship and launching a successful academic career in emergency medicine (EM). Conferences often bridge this gap, but the COVID-19 pandemic has forced their indefinite delay. Virtual solutions are needed to capitalize on the breadth of national simulation research experts and grow mentorship in a postpandemic world.
METHODS
METHODS
We developed two complementary innovations to facilitate scholarship development and minimize COVID-associated career challenges resulting from social distancing requirements. The e-fellows forum (FF) provides a capstone experience for works-in-progress and the e-consultation service (CS) supports simulation research during the earlier project stages of design and development. In conjunction with the Society for Academic Medicine's Simulation Academy, we applied videoconferencing technology for both of these novel, virtual innovations. We analyzed corresponding chat transcripts and detailed field notes for emerging themes. In addition, we collected quantitative data via participant surveys regarding their experiences and impact on their projects.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Nine simulation fellows presented at the FF and seven junior simulation investigators participated in the CS sessions. Most preferred the virtual format (56% FF, 66% CS) and found the sessions to be helpful in project advancement (66% FF, 100% CS). COVID-19 affected most projects (89% FF, 67% CS). We identified three themes via qualitative analysis: design concerns and inquiries, validation or support shown by mentors and peers, and professional cohesion.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Participants felt that both virtual mentorship innovations advanced their simulation research projects and fostered a sense of professional cohesion within a greater community of practice. These benefits can be powerful at a time where simulation researchers in EM feel disconnected in an era of social distancing. Our future work will include adaptations to a hybrid model with both virtual and in-person modalities as well as creation of more e-mentorship opportunities, thus broadening the early-career simulation research community of practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33521496
doi: 10.1002/aet2.10540
pii: AET210540
pmc: PMC7821069
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
105-110Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR001862
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Références
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jul;15(7):664-8
pubmed: 19086214
Med Educ. 2020 Aug;54(8):762-763
pubmed: 32353893
Int Orthop. 2020 Aug;44(8):1461-1466
pubmed: 32445031
Acad Med. 2018 Oct;93(10):1497-1502
pubmed: 29877914
Circ Res. 2018 May 11;122(10):1330-1333
pubmed: 29748361
Can Med Educ J. 2017 Jun 30;8(3):e81-e89
pubmed: 29098050
J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Sep;6(3):430-6
pubmed: 26279767
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Nov 27;4(Suppl 1):S130-S139
pubmed: 32072117
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Mar;11(3):253-5
pubmed: 15001404
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 May;8(2):252-5
pubmed: 27168898
Nat Rev Cancer. 2020 Jul;20(7):357-358
pubmed: 32503987
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Apr 26;3(4):347-352
pubmed: 31637352