Correlation of urinary loss rate after catheter removal and long-term urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
catheter removal
continence
prostate cancer
robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
urine loss rate
Journal
International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association
ISSN: 1442-2042
Titre abrégé: Int J Urol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9440237
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
08
07
2020
accepted:
08
12
2020
pubmed:
29
1
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
28
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the correlation of urine loss rate after catheter removal with long-term continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. We enrolled 163 patients on whom robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was carried out and whose urine loss rate we were able to evaluate after catheter removal. Urinary incontinence was evaluated from immediately after removal of the catheter to the date of discharge, and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Urine loss rate was defined as the urine loss volume divided by the total urine volume. The continence rates of patients with ≤1% urine loss rate on the day of catheter removal were 100% at 6 and 12 months after surgery. A multivariate analysis proved that ≤10% urine loss rate on the day of catheter removal was a significant predictor of continence at 3 months after surgery. Furthermore, the continence rate at 12 months of patients who did not achieve ≤10% urine loss rate on the day of catheter removal was 79.5%. Among them, the continence rate at 12 months of patients who achieved ≥15% urine loss rate improvement from the day of catheter removal to the next day was 95.2%; the factor differed significantly between the continence and incontinence groups at 12 months after surgery. The urine loss rate on the day of catheter removal is significantly related to the acquisition of urinary continence. Furthermore, our findings suggest that long-term urinary continence can be expected, even in the event of poor urine loss rate on the day of catheter removal, if it improves on the next day.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33508874
doi: 10.1111/iju.14488
pmc: PMC8049105
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
440-443Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Urology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Urological Association.
Références
Urol Int. 2013;90(1):31-5
pubmed: 23207744
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):368-81
pubmed: 22763081
Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):178-85
pubmed: 17222961
J Endourol. 2010 Jul;24(7):1105-10
pubmed: 20624081
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17
pubmed: 22749852
J Urol. 2009 Jun;181(6):2641-6
pubmed: 19375099
Int J Urol. 2014 Jul;21(7):647-51
pubmed: 24612261
Urol Int. 2016;96(4):373-8
pubmed: 26201500
Int J Urol. 2006 Sep;13(9):1191-6
pubmed: 16984551
Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):692-704
pubmed: 25454614
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):559-68
pubmed: 25457018