Ara h 2-specific IgE is superior to whole peanut extract-based serology or skin prick test for diagnosis of peanut allergy in infancy.
Ara h-2
Peanut allergy
diagnostic test
peanut components
screening
skin prick test
Journal
The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
ISSN: 1097-6825
Titre abrégé: J Allergy Clin Immunol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1275002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
28
07
2020
revised:
04
11
2020
accepted:
06
11
2020
pubmed:
24
1
2021
medline:
23
9
2021
entrez:
23
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Screening of high-risk infants for peanut allergy (PA) before introduction is now recommended in the United States, but the optimal approach is not clear. We sought to compare the diagnostic test characteristics of peanut skin prick test (SPT), peanut-specific IgE (sIgE), and sIgE to peanut components in a screening population of infants before known peanut exposure. Infants aged 4 to 11 months with (1) no history of peanut ingestion, testing, or reaction and (2) (a) moderate-severe eczema, (b) history of food allergy, and/or (c) first-degree relative with a history of PA received peanut SPT, peanut-sIgE and component-IgE testing, and, depending on SPT wheal size, oral food challenge or observed feeding. Receiver-operator characteristic areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared, and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A total of 321 subjects completed the enrollment visit (median age, 7.2 months; 58% males), and 37 (11%) were found to have PA. Overall, Ara h 2-sIgE at a cutoff point of 0.1 kUa/L discriminated between allergic and nonallergic best (AUC, 0.96; sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 98%), compared with peanut-sIgE at 0.1 kUa/L (AUC, 0.89; sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 78%) or 0.35 kUa/L (AUC, 0.91; sensitivity, 97%; specificity, 86%), or SPT at wheal size 3 mm (AUC, 0.90; sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 88%) or 8 mm (AUC, 0.87; sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 99%). Ara h 1-sIgE and Ara h 3-sIgE did not add to prediction of PA when included in a model with Ara h 2-sIgE, and Ara h 8-sIgE discriminated poorly (AUC, 0.51). Measurement of only Ara h 2-sIgE should be considered if screening of high-risk infants is performed before peanut introduction.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Screening of high-risk infants for peanut allergy (PA) before introduction is now recommended in the United States, but the optimal approach is not clear.
OBJECTIVE
We sought to compare the diagnostic test characteristics of peanut skin prick test (SPT), peanut-specific IgE (sIgE), and sIgE to peanut components in a screening population of infants before known peanut exposure.
METHODS
Infants aged 4 to 11 months with (1) no history of peanut ingestion, testing, or reaction and (2) (a) moderate-severe eczema, (b) history of food allergy, and/or (c) first-degree relative with a history of PA received peanut SPT, peanut-sIgE and component-IgE testing, and, depending on SPT wheal size, oral food challenge or observed feeding. Receiver-operator characteristic areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared, and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated.
RESULTS
A total of 321 subjects completed the enrollment visit (median age, 7.2 months; 58% males), and 37 (11%) were found to have PA. Overall, Ara h 2-sIgE at a cutoff point of 0.1 kUa/L discriminated between allergic and nonallergic best (AUC, 0.96; sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 98%), compared with peanut-sIgE at 0.1 kUa/L (AUC, 0.89; sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 78%) or 0.35 kUa/L (AUC, 0.91; sensitivity, 97%; specificity, 86%), or SPT at wheal size 3 mm (AUC, 0.90; sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 88%) or 8 mm (AUC, 0.87; sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 99%). Ara h 1-sIgE and Ara h 3-sIgE did not add to prediction of PA when included in a model with Ara h 2-sIgE, and Ara h 8-sIgE discriminated poorly (AUC, 0.51).
CONCLUSIONS
Measurement of only Ara h 2-sIgE should be considered if screening of high-risk infants is performed before peanut introduction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33483152
pii: S0091-6749(20)31710-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.11.034
pmc: PMC8462936
mid: NIHMS1694824
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
2S Albumins, Plant
0
Antigens, Plant
0
Ara h 2 allergen, Arachis hypogaea
0
Plant Extracts
0
Immunoglobulin E
37341-29-0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
977-983.e2Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U01 AI125290
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002541
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR003098
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. All rights reserved.
Références
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2016;169(4):216-22
pubmed: 27225199
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Jan;139(1):29-44
pubmed: 28065278
Clin Exp Allergy. 2015 Apr;45(4):720-30
pubmed: 25226880
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013 Jul-Aug;1(4):394-8
pubmed: 24565545
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Jun;137(6):1761-1763
pubmed: 27094361
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jun;11(3):222-8
pubmed: 21464707
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;32(1):97-109
pubmed: 22244235
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Dec;126(6 Suppl):S1-58
pubmed: 21134576
Stat Med. 2008 Jan 15;27(1):15-35
pubmed: 17566141
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Mar;147(3):984-991.e5
pubmed: 33483153
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan;141(1):41-58
pubmed: 29157945
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Sep;119(3):262-266.e1
pubmed: 28890021
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2015 Sep;26(6):497-502
pubmed: 26046378
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020 Apr;31(3):303-314
pubmed: 31872899