Effect of prosocial public health messages for population behaviour change in relation to respiratory infections: a systematic review protocol.
COVID-19
public health
respiratory infections
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 01 2021
13 01 2021
Historique:
entrez:
14
1
2021
pubmed:
15
1
2021
medline:
30
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic represents a major societal challenge that requires large-scale behaviour change, widespread collective action and cooperation to reduce viral transmission. Existing literature indicates that several messaging approaches may be effective, including emphasising the benefits to the recipient, aligning with the recipient's moral values and focusing on protecting others. Current research suggests that prosocial public health messages that highlight behaviours linked to societal benefits (eg, protecting 'each other'), rather than focusing on behaviours that protect oneself (eg, protecting 'yourself'), may be a more effective method for communicating strategies related to infectious disease. To investigate this we will conduct a systematic review that will identify what messages and behaviour change techniques have the potential to optimise the effect on population behaviour in relation to reducing transmission of respiratory infections. A systematic literature search of published and unpublished studies (including grey literature) in electronic databases will be conducted to identify those that meet our inclusion criteria. The search will be run in four electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Scopus. We will also conduct supplementary searches in databases of 'grey' literature such as PsycEXTRA, Social Science Research Network and OSF PREPRINTS, and use the Google Scholar search engine. A systematic approach to searching, screening, reviewing and data extraction will be applied based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Titles, abstracts and full texts for eligibility will be examined independently by researchers. The quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tool. Disagreements will be resolved by a consensus procedure. This protocol has been registered with PROSPERO. No ethical approval is required, as there will be no collection of primary data. The synthesised findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication. CRD42020198874.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33441367
pii: bmjopen-2020-044763
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044763
pmc: PMC7812082
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e044763Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0901474
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 12;11(1):20222
pubmed: 34642341
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 04;7:141
pubmed: 31214561
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 11;14:589
pubmed: 24920395
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Aug 27;59(33):1057-62
pubmed: 20798667
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e261-e270
pubmed: 32220655
Health Commun. 2014;29(10):1057-66
pubmed: 24447056
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:105-114
pubmed: 29432858
Am J Epidemiol. 1982 May;115(5):736-51
pubmed: 7081204
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 12;11:564434
pubmed: 33510664
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471
pubmed: 32355299
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):660-7
pubmed: 21613640
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(34):1-108
pubmed: 20630122
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):
pubmed: 32764128
J Health Commun. 2015;20(5):573-80
pubmed: 25826606
BMC Public Health. 2012 Apr 26;12:307
pubmed: 22537252
Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;31(11):1363-1373
pubmed: 32993455
Lancet. 2022 Apr 30;399(10336):e39-e40
pubmed: 32305074
Psychol Bull. 2015 Nov;141(6):1178-204
pubmed: 26501228
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):e048750
pubmed: 34764167
Public Health. 2020 May;182:163-169
pubmed: 32334182
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113478
pubmed: 33162198
J Emerg Manag. 2020 Mar/Apr;18(2):87-89
pubmed: 32181864
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Jul 17;53(8):693-707
pubmed: 30304386
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 21;14:579
pubmed: 25413154
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 26;11(7):e0159780
pubmed: 27459237
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:365-92
pubmed: 15709940
Health Promot J Austr. 2020 Apr;31(2):158-160
pubmed: 32197274
BMJ. 2020 Aug 19;370:m3021
pubmed: 32816815
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77
pubmed: 28637486
Am J Public Health. 2009 Oct;99 Suppl 2:S324-32
pubmed: 19797744
Health Commun. 2016 Oct;31(10):1284-90
pubmed: 26940483
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Nov;19(99):1-188
pubmed: 26616119
Psychol Sci. 2011 Dec;22(12):1494-9
pubmed: 22075239
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Aug;74(8):617-619
pubmed: 32385125