Current and Long-Term Physical Activity Among Adults with Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: COM-B Variables as Explanatory Factors.
Behavior change
Capability-opportunity-motivation-behavior (COM-B) model
Multiple sclerosis
Physical activity
Journal
International journal of behavioral medicine
ISSN: 1532-7558
Titre abrégé: Int J Behav Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9421097
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
accepted:
08
12
2020
pubmed:
10
1
2021
medline:
10
1
2021
entrez:
9
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Physical activity is an evidence-based, safe second-line approach for improved multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms and disease progression. This study examined the contributions of Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) factors for understanding engagement in current and long-term physical activity among persons with MS in the United States (U.S.). Adults with MS in the U.S. (N = 854) completed an online survey that included questions regarding demographic and clinical characteristics, COM-B constructs, Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ), and Physical Activity Staging Questionnaire (PASQ). Participants were classified into groups based on the GLTEQ regarding current physical activity behavior and PASQ for long-term physical activity behavior. MANOVA and discriminant function analysis (DFA) identified COM-B constructs that differentiated physical activity groups. MANOVA analyses indicated that all COM-B constructs were significantly different for both GLTEQ current physical activity groups (Wilks's λ = .5, F(44, 1432) = 14.8) and PASQ long-term physical activity groups (Wilks's λ = .4, F(44, 1464) = 16.9) status except Information Provision. DFA analysis regarding GLTEQ identified a function including exclusively Capability and Motivation sources of behavior that differentiated current physical activity groups such as intention and self-efficacy. DFA for PASQ identified a different function of the Capability and Motivation sources of behavior that differentiated long-term physical activity groups; the primary differentiating variables were action control and intention. Our results identify internal factors as the primary COM-B predictors of current and long-term physical activity among adults with MS in the U.S., and health promotion interventions may focus on assessing individual competencies and behavioral regulation for changing physical activity in MS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Physical activity is an evidence-based, safe second-line approach for improved multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms and disease progression. This study examined the contributions of Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) factors for understanding engagement in current and long-term physical activity among persons with MS in the United States (U.S.).
METHOD
METHODS
Adults with MS in the U.S. (N = 854) completed an online survey that included questions regarding demographic and clinical characteristics, COM-B constructs, Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ), and Physical Activity Staging Questionnaire (PASQ). Participants were classified into groups based on the GLTEQ regarding current physical activity behavior and PASQ for long-term physical activity behavior. MANOVA and discriminant function analysis (DFA) identified COM-B constructs that differentiated physical activity groups.
RESULTS
RESULTS
MANOVA analyses indicated that all COM-B constructs were significantly different for both GLTEQ current physical activity groups (Wilks's λ = .5, F(44, 1432) = 14.8) and PASQ long-term physical activity groups (Wilks's λ = .4, F(44, 1464) = 16.9) status except Information Provision. DFA analysis regarding GLTEQ identified a function including exclusively Capability and Motivation sources of behavior that differentiated current physical activity groups such as intention and self-efficacy. DFA for PASQ identified a different function of the Capability and Motivation sources of behavior that differentiated long-term physical activity groups; the primary differentiating variables were action control and intention.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our results identify internal factors as the primary COM-B predictors of current and long-term physical activity among adults with MS in the U.S., and health promotion interventions may focus on assessing individual competencies and behavioral regulation for changing physical activity in MS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33420718
doi: 10.1007/s12529-020-09946-w
pii: 10.1007/s12529-020-09946-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
561-574Informations de copyright
© 2021. International Society of Behavioral Medicine.
Références
Wallin MT, Culpepper WJ, Campbell JD, et al. The prevalence of MS in the United States: a population-based estimate using health claims data. Neurology. 2019;92:e1029-1040.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007035
Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2008;372:1502–17.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61620-7
Motl RW, Sandroff BM, Kwakkel G, et al. Exercise in patients with multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:848–56.
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30281-8
Klaren RE, Motl RW, Dlugonski D, Sandroff BM, Pilutti LA. Objectively quantified physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:2342–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.011
Motl RW, Pekmezi D, Wingo BC. Promotion of physical activity and exercise in multiple sclerosis: importance of behavioral science and theory. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2018;4:2055217318786745.
pubmed: 30090642
pmcid: 6077908
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37
Riemann-Lorenz K, Motl RW, Casey B, Coote S, Daubmann A, Heesen C. Possible determinants of long-term adherence to physical activity in multiple sclerosis-theory-based development of a comprehensive questionnaire and results from a German survey study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020:1–14.
Dalgas U, Hvid LG, Kwakkel G, Motl RW, de Groot V, Feys P, Op’t Eijnde B, Coote S, Beckerman H, Pfeifer K, Streber R. Moving exercise research in multiple sclerosis forward (the MoXFo initiative): Developing consensus statements for research. Mult Scler. 2020;12:1352458520910360.
Riemann-Lorenz K, Wienert J, Streber R, Motl RW, Coote S, Heesen C. Long-term physical activity in people with multiple sclerosis: exploring expert views on facilitators and barriers. Disabil Rehabil. 2019:1–13.
Gold SM, Heesen C, Schulz H, Guder U, Monch A, Gbadamosi J, et al. Disease specific quality of life instruments in multiple sclerosis: validation of the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS). Mult Scler. 2001;7:119–30.
doi: 10.1177/135245850100700208
Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychol Health. 2005;20:143–60.
doi: 10.1080/08870440512331317670
Sniehotta FF, Schwarzer R, Scholz U, Schüz B. Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: theory and assessment. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2005;35:565–76.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.258
Fuchs R, Göhner W, Mahler C, et al. Aufbau eines körperlich-aktiven Lebensstils im Kontext der medizinischen Rehabilitation: Ein motivational-volitionales Interventionskonzept (MoVo-LISA Projekt). Unveröffentlichter Endbericht Freiburg: Universität Freiburg; 2008.
Rose EA, Markland D, Parfitt G. The development and initial validation of the Exercise Causality Orientations Scale. J Sports Sci. 2001;19:445–62.
doi: 10.1080/026404101300149393
Rovniak LS, Anderson ES, Winett RA, Stephens RS. Social cognitive determinants of physical activity in young adults: a prospective structural equation analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2002;24:149–56.
doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2402_12
Schwarzer R, Luszczynska A, Ziegelmann JP, Scholz U, Lippke S. Social-cognitive predictors of physical exercise adherence: three longitudinal studies in rehabilitation. Health Psychol. 2008;27(1s):S54-63.
doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1(Suppl.).S54
Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60:631–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020
McAuley E, Motl RW, White SM, Wojcicki TR. Validation of the multidimensional outcome expectations for exercise scale in ambulatory, symptom-free persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:100–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.011
Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Luszczynska A. Mechanisms of health behavior change in persons with chronic illness or disability: the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA). Rehabil Psychol. 2011;56:161–70.
doi: 10.1037/a0024509
Herzberg PY, Glaesmer H, Hoyer J. Separating optimism and pessimism: a robust psychometric analysis of the Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R). Psychol Assess. 2006;18:433.
doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.433
Fuchs R, Fuchs R. Sportbezogene Konsequenzerfahrungen: Das Konstrukt und seine Messung. Freiburg: Universität Freiburg; 2013.
Godin G, Shephard R. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985;10:141–6.
pubmed: 4053261
Motl RW, Bollaert RE, Sandroff BM. Validation of the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire classification coding system using accelerometry in multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol. 2018;63:77.
doi: 10.1037/rep0000162
Nigg C, Hellsten L, Norman G, et al. Physical activity staging distribution: establishing a heuristic using multiple studies. Ann Behav Med. 2005;29(Suppl):35–45.
doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2902s_7
Learmonth YC, Motl RW, Sandroff BM, Pula JH, Cadavid D. Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol. 2013;13:37.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-37
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. Using multivariate statistics (6th edn, Vol. 5). Pearson: Boston;2007
Comrey A, Lee H. Interpretation and application of factor analytic results. Comrey AL, Lee HB A first course in factor analysis. 1992;2.
Carey RN, Connell LE, Johnston M, et al. Behavior change techniques and their mechanisms of action: a synthesis of links described in published intervention literature. Ann Behav Med. 2019;53:693–707.
pubmed: 30304386
Latimer-Cheung AE, Pilutti LA, Hicks AL, et al. Effects of exercise training on fitness, mobility, fatigue, and health-related quality of life among adults with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review to inform guideline development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(1800–1828):e3.
Fasczewski KS, Gill DL, Rothberger SM. Physical activity motivation and benefits in people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:1517–23.
doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1300946
Motl RW, McAuley E, DiStefano C. Is social desirability associated with self-reported physical activity? Prev Med. 2005;40:735–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.016
Learmonth YC, Motl RW. Physical activity and exercise training in multiple sclerosis: a review and content analysis of qualitative research identifying perceived determinants and consequences. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:1227–42.
doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1077397